What Can't Be Hidden with Brandon Andress / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the audio


Brandon Andress 0:00

fiction is incredibly subversive. And what I mean by that is that with nonfiction, I just write what I know, I write down what's in my head on a piece of paper. And that's where you agree or disagree. With fiction, you're weaving together a story with color and shape and emotion and nuance and background and story. And there's so much more complexity. And there's so much you understand why a person's making the decision, they're making you understand where they came from, what what forces are at work that made them make that decision. And it gives you an opportunity. Like, while you're learning a deeper kind of meta truth about this, you're understanding the complexities of relationship, you're understanding how a person can perceive another person and how a person came to the decision they did. And I find it so incredibly, because it makes you feel what they feel it puts you in their skin, and it allows for an enormous amount of empathy, which I think me writing a nonfiction piece people missed the entire point or they just dismiss it before they even get to it. But with this I'm having people from across the ideological spectrum wrestling with these ideas that they are engaging with them like they never have

Unknown 1:23

a put on not a waste. That Don't Look Back in Anger. Yes, the banner, a roll down the windows, like every cliche, and I loudly proclaim, tell the worst the procure to go in peace. Play that Sergeant Pepper's. She's leaving home and I let it so proud to go and get a singer falsetto like

Seth Price 1:47

hello there, everybody. Welcome back to the show. I'm Seth. This is the podcast. So there's a couple quick announcements for this episode. I brought back on Brandon Andrus, who is a friend of mine in front of the show. And the years ago, like a year, year and a half ago, Brandon sent me the beginning of a book that I read on vacation at the beach, like I literally sat there in a lawn chair or beach chair, whatever kind of chair you call those chairs, had the water lap on my feet for a full week and just sat there with this book. And it was an impactful book, the book that we're talking about is Brandon's latest called what can't be hidden. And full disclosure. I love it. Like I really do like the book. It is allegorical and metaphorical and very deep, if you want it to be, and I think it's an important book for everybody to read, regardless of what you normally read. So there we go, my cards are on the table. This is not an unbiased interview, you're gonna hear Brandon and I try to talk about the book without giving things away. And that is because there are a few specific questions at the end. Where do I just ask some burning things that you know are on my mind about the book and there are going to be multiple spoiler warnings for that before so. And yeah, so that's where we're at. I'm gonna roll with it. This is not my best intro, and I'm sorry, but I'm gonna roll with it. Let's go Brandon Andrus, we're back. We did it. You're What's this been? Like, two, three years now? Since you're on the show. It's 18. Yeah, that's three years. It's a long time. I didn't feel like that long. Welcome back to the show, man.

Brandon Andress 3:47

Dude, it is so good to be back. I felt like I never really left because we've kind of developed a friendship along the way. And so you know, beauty in the wreckage came out. I was on the podcast. And then it seems like it wasn't too long after that, where I wrote this kind of huge blog series on how and you picked it up and did an audio version and two episodes, which was amazing, by the way. And that had a huge response. Thank you. And so yeah, I mean, and now here I am. So it doesn't feel too long. I mean, we've kept in touch behind the scenes, right? Yeah,

Seth Price 4:23

yeah, definitely. Yeah. On a I don't know, what semi monthly basis, bi monthly. I don't know what the word is. I'm not good with that. Regular regular basis. So what's new since 2018 So you've you've probably hiked the bulk of the planet, or the circumference of the planet or like what what is new for you since since then? And for those listening before you answer that. I will link somewhere here there in the show notes to the first one if you want to listen to that. And it should was a good it's a good book, and it's a good chat as well. But yeah,

Brandon Andress 4:53

what actually yeah, I'll answer your question, but I remember at the time when I did that last interview And I remember that you are toward the end of all of these podcasts that I had done successively. And I was exhausted. I was so beat whenever you and I talked. I didn't have anything left. And so you could probably hear it in my voice. But nonetheless. Yeah, I mean, I've been backpacking. I can't remember. I think I went to the Pacific Northwest last year. This year we went to, we're not even sure where we went. Yeah, yeah, I've already lost it. So Antarctica. Oh, no, we were in Colorado. We went to Colorado and did part of the Colorado trail. And so we did that. And then three years ago, I guess right after you and I chatted, I went to Wyoming and got hurt. So that was the first time I've been hurt on a trip. But yeah, from a backpacking perspective, that's about it. I think we're going to go back this coming year to Wyoming one more time because we have failed the same route twice. One time a guy got sick with altitude sickness. I got hurt by stepping on a big rock and twisting my ankle. Yeah. So the third time is going to be a charm.

Seth Price 6:08

So did you get like airlifted out, or they carry you out? Or do you crawl or what does that look like?

Brandon Andress 6:14

No, I mean, airlifting someone out would probably be $100,000,

Seth Price 6:18

just money. It's just money. It's fun money. That's why I had

Brandon Andress 6:22

to write this book to try to make now but yeah, I just tighten up the boot and said, Let's do it. And I twisted it a couple more times, because you kind of lose that structural support. And I think I did 30 more miles on it. It was the size of my knee when I finished and it took about six to seven months to heal and strength. It was ready next year. But it was it was pretty rough sounds off. Yeah, it was terrible. But I mean, these are stunningly beautiful places the solitude is second to none. Yeah, these are literally places where you go, and likely very few people have been there and you don't see people while you're there. So it's, it's really kind of worth it even. Even though Yeah, it can be painful at

Seth Price 7:07

times. No, I get that. So I think you know, this, if not, you're about to so my wife and I went to Sedona in June, I loved everything like there were so with the time shift difference, we would be out there at 334 o'clock in the morning, which is fine, because the trailheads are open. And we would finish our hike by 10 o'clock in the morning, hike, you know, 510 whatever miles and it wasn't too hot, wasn't too cold. But it was we were by ourselves. Like we literally could have done whatever we wanted. And it was wonderful. So very wonderful. Um, yeah, that solitude is is freakin amazing. And it was also that beautiful.

Brandon Andress 7:41

I mean, and Sedona is just stunning. Oh, yeah. Beautiful, amazing area.

Seth Price 7:46

Yeah. Especially to watch the sun come up. So you you referenced this a minute ago. So we need to sell we need to sell some books. Everybody listening, go and purchase a copy of this book not

Brandon Andress 7:56

forget the interview. Let's just buy it. Yeah, just

Seth Price 7:58

interviews done by the book. Come back later and leave a review. Um, so no, so you did you wrote a book called I always get the name wrong. What can't be hidden. Correct? Yeah. Yeah. And it's a novel, which is different than your other past works? Yes. Yeah. So why why a novel random what, what? What is it that says, you know, what I'd like to do, I'd like to build an entire world because that would be easier than than theology.

Brandon Andress 8:28

I didn't try to write a fiction book. I didn't want to write a fiction book necessarily. I'd spent 15 years writing my blog. And I think, kind of out of that sprang the first book, which was self published in 2010. And then there was a subsequent book in 2013, also self published. And both of those were nonfiction works. And then of course, in 2017, I wrote Beauty and the wreckage came out in 18. And that, too, was nonfiction. And I'll tell you what, I I started getting this sense internally, and I can't really pinpoint when it was or how long ago it was. But I started getting this feeling that I don't even know how to say it. That something had to change because we had reached a point largely in our culture, where as soon as someone would introduce an idea, someone could look at the idea and say, I agree or disagree and shut down the rest of the conversation. And that whole dialectic of being able to engage with people and share kind of your truth about opinion ideas and wrestle through that and try to find greater truth. It just seemed like it was being lost. I think we've largely lost it. I think. I'm kind of getting hopeful again, that we're starting to rediscover that but at that time, I was getting the sense that Man, I was putting out blogs, and people were just shutting down before they would even engage with it and wouldn't even wrestle with it. They had already preconceived ideas either about me or the content. And they were just done. And so I, I was feeling that, but I never would have thought fiction. I mean, that was not the remedy. I wish I thought really, honestly, the remedy was just I'm done. To be frank, I thought, I'm going to shut down the blog, I will archive it, I will keep it but I felt really disengaged. And then in June of 2019, and I've told the story before, but I was mowing my grass. And I was probably like, four swipes into it. And all of a sudden, this image kind of, I say downloaded, it just came to my mind, it was just out of nowhere. And this is how primitive it sounds. It was a circle with like a line through it. And I started thinking about it, I'm like, That is a fracture in the hole. That is an island. And I thought, Man, I I started having this idea. So I stopped a mo and got on my phone and started taking notes. And it was just like this massive download, I stood there for 30 minutes and just typed on my phone, like these ideas that I had. And probably three days of doing this, you know, right and in stand in the yard for three days.

Seth Price 11:29

My wife came out, she mowed the grass, I sat down, and under

Brandon Andress 11:33

the moonlight he continued. And so, you know, I took some time to sleep at night. And I would wake up the next morning and take some more notes because all this stuff was coming to me. And for me personally, the way that I work, anytime that I write, I can't write just ideas I have to write where I have a passion and an energy inside of me that just feels like that it's gonna explode if I can't get it out. And the problem with that is, as you can imagine, trying to sustain that level of emotion and intensity over the span of a book can be exhausting. Yeah. But at the same time, I just don't want to write to write not I don't want to write for writing sake. So I parked all those notes for five months. And I thought I'm going to go back to it. I'm going to reread it and see if I still have that energy for it. And so whenever I went back in October of 19, I was like, Man, this is clicking More ideas were coming. And around Halloween of 2019. Two years ago, I started working on it, I started putting together character, you know, descriptions, character arcs, the timeline, I mean, everything you could think of, I have a notebook that's just full of scratch and scribble. And that was the genesis of it. Is

Seth Price 12:51

that the same way that you write your nonfiction as well just burn the wicket both ends? And then turn it in?

Brandon Andress 12:56

No, I don't think so. But this was really weird. And I think that you'll probably hear a lot of this a similar story from other authors during this time is that I was on one particular timeline, I think and what I wanted to get done with this book and the time that I wanted to finish it, but then COVID happened, like what I started in November, so March, so yeah, five months into it. And all of a sudden, my timeline just shrunk because I had, you know, time horse, mornings, I would get up and write before work. But then on weekends I just had all the time in the world. So I would wake up at 5am and write until two or 3pm in the afternoon on Saturdays and Sundays. And all of a sudden, I knocked off three months of writing. Yeah, put your stuff in believable. But it was kind of nice, in a sense. But one thing that I didn't expect is that there's a certain like, for me, there's so much of me in this book, for better or worse, that there were things that were happening to me while I was writing that I didn't like and I felt

Seth Price 14:06

like what do you mean? Yeah, it was,

Brandon Andress 14:09

this is gonna sound really bad. But it was almost a sense of mania at times because I couldn't shut off what was constantly going through my head with carrying all of these characters with me. And at night, my mind would literally I couldn't shut it off my mind would race all night long and I would wake up the next morning completely exhausted. I I've never once in my life ever I like I am. I don't even know what the word anxiety means or stress. I'm like the most carefree i i Don't get worked up. And I had to go to the doctor because I thought that I was having heart issues in the middle of this. And he said, No, your heart sounds great. We did an EKG and he's like, you're just you're anxious. Yeah. So they're certain and I attributed directly to this book because there were things that I was wrestling through myself. You know, I'm just gonna be honest with you and your audience. And I don't say this in all the interviews, and I probably don't want to talk about it too much with other people. But there's a lot of this that's like an auto autobiography. It's autobiographical. No one would ever necessarily pick that up. I mean, it's deep within it. But it's like, there are certain things that I needed to work through in this fiction book, without making it obvious.

Seth Price 15:33

Yeah, yeah. So I have four questions scripted specifically about the text. One of them is kind of that it's an autobiographical question. Because what I know of you is to recharge, you escaped to the middle of nowhere. And the setting for the book, as long as I'm not giving away more than you want, is also in the middle of nowhere. Why, like what is necessary to reconnect to some, not epistemological truth? Because I don't think that that's the right way to say truth, at least not in this context. What is the necessity to get away from all of the things?

Brandon Andress 16:14

It's an interesting question, because in one sense, if you look at the setting, which is an island, you would think this is a place where people go to get away and find solitude and respite and recharge, right? But what we find out very quickly is that it just doesn't come naturally. Right? And you can set up structures within that environment that are very self limiting, that suck the life and freedom and peace out of a person. And ultimately, that's what it explores, you know, it, it really explores this story explores ideas of asking the question, what is peace? What is freedom, and there are these definitions that we operate by. And I think that is kind of soaked into how we think about ourselves in the world. And I really challenged those questions quite a bit to say, Man, I mean, if you're set if your assertion is an island ought to be a place of respite and recharge, yet it's not life giving at all and you feel anything but that then the question is, why wouldn't you feel that? Why wouldn't you necessarily find peace and freedom in that place? That's the fundamental question.

Seth Price 17:26

Yeah. Yeah. But the problem is, I'm asking the questions.

Brandon Andress 17:30

You gotta know. Anytime that you asked me one, you're gonna get one back.

Seth Price 17:35

No, but I agree. So I do the same thing, which is why I think I live where I live, like, I live right off the Skyline Drive of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Like that's, that's where I go. Like, we had a chance just for four or five hours on Sunday. Yeah, my mother in law said, I'll get the kids, y'all hang out for five or six hours, could have done literally anything. We went up into the mountains and hiked with the dogs. Like, and I don't think that we spoke my wife. And I like, until we got back. And then we went get some ice cream. And we talked a lot then. But I don't believe that we even think we spoke saying we're like four miles and you want to turn around? And we both agreed? Yeah, it's probably good. You know? And,

Brandon Andress 18:14

but it seems like your intention was that you wanted to be in a place of presence with your wife that was regenitive, regenerative and restorative? Yeah, yet, I've been on trips and past people that are texting on their phones that are you know, they have it clipped to their side, and the volume is on the way up with the speaker. And I think there are people that just can't cut the chain. So it's like, you know, I think that that's really the thing, it's, it's an intention and intentionality with what you're doing. And it's exactly what we find in the other eye. You know, the, I know, we're being super enigmatic what let's just, let's just cut in here is I can imagine, like listening to this interview, and I'm like, Man, you guys are kind of talking this large 40,000 foot view meta narrative language. And we're not even sure anything about this book. And the truth is, is that it's really impossible to talk about this book. And it's really difficult when you're trying to get people to buy it. But it's hard to talk about this particular book, because every single thing in it is a spoiler. And so we're not being super elusive here. It's just that it I find it very difficult to say much about it specifically without giving all of it away.

Seth Price 19:32

Yeah, no, I agree. I've sent you bits as I've been rereading back through it, like, in so to speak of it to that. So, like, there are times when I'll read a couple paragraphs, and I'll be like, Oh, well, that sounds like the the the politics that we live in today. There are other times where I'm like, oh, Congress's arguing about that today. And then there are other times I'm like, my pastor just said something like that. Very similar on Sunday. I like this. Maybe that's me. I don't know. I found myself wondering if the words were written in such a way that I could imprint myself onto the story. Maybe I'm right, maybe I'm wrong, I have no idea. And when I read it, I think I've told you in the past, like, I read it the first time, sitting at the ocean, listening to the waves come in and out. And then gradually, yeah, we were at the Outer Banks, and just gradually moving my chair, I think I read it over the course of a week, and that first time, just at the water, just over and over and over. And then to make matters worse, I just read chapter 15. Earlier today, as you know, we get to watch the sun come up. And there's the water. And I'm like, see, say I can't anyway. Yeah, I don't know you that

Brandon Andress 20:39

said. I mean, first and foremost, there are two layers to this book. And the first one is, I wanted to write a compelling story that was a page turner. It's a psychological thriller. And, you know, people are like, Well, what books did you read that inspired this book, and I'm like, I don't read Leviticus at all. And nor do I read fiction books, which, you know, that has to be a mark against me. But I, I would say that my biggest inspiration was breaking bad, because I'm a very visual guy. And I love watching Good, good sitcoms and dramas. And I take mental notes about like the great things about what makes me want to engage with something, the level of creativity and depth and the way things are connected, especially with Breaking Bad, but also the way that it leaves you wanting more. And so I think that that was kind of the inspiration. If no one gets anything more out of this book, I wanted to write a super compelling page turner that people thoroughly enjoy. But I have to tell you this, I went to this author event in southern Indiana, I was at a bookstore. And it was my first one for this book. And I know how I would do it with my nonfiction books, I hadn't really thought through the dynamics of how to do a fiction author event. So I set up my books, one with the cover facing the other book with the back where it shows the synopsis of the story. And I just figured that if people wanted to know about the book, they'd pick it up and read the back of the back of the book and read the synopsis. And everybody started coming up and saying, What's your book about? And I was like, picking it out. It's like, Dude, I just wrote 88,000 words, like you want me to distill it down to, you know, a couple of sound bites. So after a handful people finally doing it, I created a little elevator pitch that I put together, I'm just going to go ahead and tell the Yeah, what synopsis of the book is. So on this island, there's an isolated and restrictive community. And they believe that they're the only people that live on that island. And one day, they have guards that are scouting in the forest, and they happen to see something move, and they see somebody watching them. And so they pursue the stranger. And they apprehend him, taking him back into the town. But as you can imagine, you kind of know how the town's going to react. They think they're the only people on the island, a stranger as being apprehended and brought into town and people start freaking out. And fear just takes over. They're panic stricken. They put the stranger in the jail, to try to figure out what to do with them. And all the while there's a 17 year old girl who has only known life on the island, who's only known life in that community. And she's curious about this stranger. So she goes and befriends him by night, because she wants to help him escape. So she can leave with him too, huh? Yeah, so that's about as much I'm gonna give.

Seth Price 23:56

Yeah. And I would say for those listening, that is not the whole story. Anyway, I find myself wanting to argue with you. So who so? Can I make this a little bit theological because I can't help myself. Um, so there are some dreams for one of the main characters in the middle of the of the of the novel there and and in this dream, there's, there's like a drowning, there's water is deeply symbolic, and in many parts of the of the story, and I'm curious the role of those dreams. And I hope you know that the dreams I'm talking about with with, with OG, who's one of the characters in there, is that some form of bastardize baptism, is it something else? Is it just fever dreams from anxiety? Like, what is that?

Brandon Andress 24:50

Yeah, great question. So the one thing that I'll say before I answer your question is that every single word, every single sentence, every single paragraph Half of this book is intentional. It all has meaning. It's deeply symbolic. The story is an allegory. So it does have a story beneath the story. So you're right on with your assessment. So I think whenever I was writing this particular essay dream whenever I was writing this particular passage in the book, I was

Seth Price 25:24

anyone Yeah, yeah.

Brandon Andress 25:26

Yeah. Yeah. So I'm just not trying to give it all away. Yeah, so I was thinking about, you know, he wakes up and he is ready to go on this journey. And the entire town is sitting and awaiting him. And then it kind of catches him off guard, he's like, up really early, and the entire town is there. And something very strange has occurred, I mean, right down the aisle that was normally just kind of a grass or dirt path is now trenched out with water in it. And so he's very confused about how they did that. But he starts walking in it, and the water I think, goes up to his knees, or maybe mid thigh. And as he looks up, and as he's walking in this water, there's this limestone structure in front of him, that is kind of a, it's pooled water underneath of it. But these arches go up to the top and kind of hold this thing together. And at each pillar, there are four people at each pillar standing there looking at him. And so one is the religious leader. And I think another is his wife. Is that right? And then I think other is his son. And then one of the other characters, I think, one of the guards, is that, right? And, you know, as he's walking down, they each give this kind of nod or a gesture to him kind of an acknowledgment. And I think the way that I kind of kind of not going to give away what happens right through us, but he makes his way to it, and the entire congregation or the audience or the town, start singing the song. And the refrain was, this is why you've lost the people, which it kind of recall something that he heard earlier in the story. And as he's watching how do you how do you say this without?

Seth Price 27:28

I don't? I don't know, I don't actually want that. I'm just curious, like, the role of water? Like is that some like, I'm just personally curious, like, is that some form of? Yeah, I think spiritual baptism is, I don't know what like, I don't I don't know, the just the role of the water in that story, I find myself I've actually thought about it quite a bit.

Brandon Andress 27:51

But the thing is, is that throughout the entire story, water is prominent symbolically. And I would say in this case, your assertion is absolutely correct. That, you know, water, as we know, it symbolically, is something that is regenerated, like we discussed earlier, it's it's it's symbolic of regeneration, it's symbolic of cleansing of, you know, coming back, coming up out of the water in this kind of resurrected, lifegiving state. And what we see happening in that particular scene is kind of this coerced or forced trauma that happens within this religious this kind of political religious community. So yeah, I mean, in this particular case, it's kind of like, the, you have certain ideas about what this and we get a contrast to it later in the story, right, whenever. So yeah, I think that's the thing is like, it really truly is this contrast between the two of you know, is Is this water, something that we continue to drink in? And that gives us life? Or is it something used for a function or a purpose to reach certain ends? Yeah, that was a really long answer to get to.

Seth Price 29:06

We did it. We did it. So I want to ask a couple questions that that are not necessarily based on content in the book, but maybe some some thoughts coming back from from reading the book. So if I was to read this in a setting of religious people, so say, I do a six week thing. We're going to read a couple chapters a night, and then we're going to discuss it for an hour at the end of those six weeks. Are the congregants in this body of people? Are they angry? At the challenges? Are they accusatory of you as an author? Like, what do you feel like would be a normal 100 people in a room? Be like, yeah, that's not. That's not. That's not I guess I've told people about some of the things in it. And they're like, Yeah, well, that's me. I know. That's not me. I'm like, but it's, it's me. That's it. You know what I mean? Like, what do you feel like that the feedback would be from people just taking that in.

Brandon Andress 30:05

So on the back of the hardcover book, it's completely blank. And this is very bizarre, because that's a place where you would typically put blurbs from people who are writing, trying to get others to buy your book. Yeah. And I intentionally left it blank, because usually you get people to write blurbs. Who are who reached the specific audience that you're trying to reach? And I also know that people tune out because it's like, well, they're like the last book I did had roar on the back, it had Hilary McBride on the back. And, you know, people can automatically look at that and be like, Wow, that's a way more progressive crowd than I'm comfortable with. Yeah, so it alienates an entire demographic. And with this fiction book, I did not want to alienate anyone on any, at any end of either political, either end of the political spectrum, because it's, honestly, I'm not saying this to be shocking or anything, but it literally is going to step on everybody's toes. And it doesn't matter where you're at. And I had somebody who read it early on, one of the early readers said, this book is can be an inch deep, or it can be a mile deep. And I think it's just a matter of where you want to go. I mean, how will you engage with the material? How will you let it sit with you? There are people who read maybe the first chapter and assumed that I was making certain political statements. But to be honest, the more you get into the book, you realize, Wow, this is way more complex than I imagined. This is hitting everybody everywhere.

Seth Price 31:43

Yeah. Yeah, yeah. No, I agree. I want

Brandon Andress 31:47

to answer your question. No, I, I do have a church. Actually, I'm sitting in a church right now. And this is not my house. We've been recording a podcast, and we've been recording it here at his office. And so that's why I'm set up here. But that he has a group of people here at the church that are going through it right now. And I just I, I want people to know that this book for me is not it's not a Christian book. I mean, I think you probably know that. I mean, it's not really I think that they may have put it on Amazon as like, one of the categories is Christian, it's really not a quote unquote, Christian book. It's definitely a deeper spirituality, if you will. I mean, there's no question that it has the heart of Christ in it. I don't think there's any question about that. But I just really feel like that this is a book for people. This is a book for humanity. And I, I want it to not cause division I don't, that's not where I'm at anymore. I I'm just not in that place. I really feel like there's a place for challenging the systems and they need to be challenged. There's a place for running from the system and deconstructing, and I've been there a long time, a long time ago. I mean, I think I started that in 2007. So I've been in that place for a long time. And I'm at a place now where it's like, I think by finishing this book, that was the absolute clothes on deconstruction for me, and I'm like, how can it be? life giving? How can it be helpful? How can it begin healing some of our deep divides? Yeah, that's just the heart of it. I think,

Seth Price 33:29

yeah, I, as someone to I also, I think I'm on the other side of deconstruction. And I've reached a point where I'm like, I love that you like that. Like, when I'm talking to other people, I'm like, I like that. That's where you're at. I've been there. I like that, that's where you're at, I've been there. It's, it's a good place to be. I liked it when I was there. You know, it's just easier that way. Like, I I can relate to that. I've, I've had that same thought at times in my life. If you could throw punch one of the characters that you wrote, who has it?

Brandon Andress 34:01

You know, let me just say it this way. A lot of them. Well, it's because, you know, here we kind of go again, with the autobiographical nature of it. There is a lot of me and all of the characters because it's different times of my life. And so whenever you see some of their good parts, hopefully, it's maybe where I'm moving toward and if I see some bad parts or their shortcomings, hopefully that's where I've come from, and I'm probably bringing still some of the shortcomings with me, but I think that anytime that I you know, like one of the things that one of the main protagonists Thera deals with is she's reached me she's right on track man, she's, she's hungry. She's young. She wants to find freedom outside of this community. And yet she really struggles with the believing that everybody she's left behind is a lost cause. And believing that there's nothing redeemable about that community, and it's like, I wanted to throw punch her. Really? Yeah, we just got that. And then, you know, then there's another character who's a main protagonist. And, you know, he is a lot of the issue for the community. And I'm not going to go too deep into them. But like, there's that and, you know, of course, the main religious leader. He's

Seth Price 35:31

definitely.

Brandon Andress 35:33

Anyway, though, I

Seth Price 35:34

actually I actually don't think I want to throw punches him if he was a person, because I totally can get that I see it daily, like the the, what's the word I want to say? The ability to intentionally make yourself appear and become more powerful. I struggle with that. I see other people do it. Well, the person for me that I wanted to punch Every time she's on the page is actually Veloz. I can't stand her. I can't at all, every, every single time. I just don't

Brandon Andress 36:18

actually there was not much really good about.

Seth Price 36:22

Maybe that's maybe that's why I just like, every time I literally will breathe a sigh of like, fine.

Brandon Andress 36:31

That's so funny to hear. Yeah, I mean, but But truly that said, I mean, and maybe you've had the same experience as you were reading it, because I've had actually people say this, they've said, I think there's a discussion group on Facebook for people who are kind of wrestling through the book and asking questions. Okay, well, it's a private group. So maybe I'll just send you in. Sure. But anyway, I mean, a lot of people have asked the question about the characters, like, a lot of people are saying is, Who are these characters? Is it just one person and time is that, you know, Brandon, throughout his life, is it you know, so people are asking these questions. And I, I think that, you know, there's probably a truth woven deeply within that. And some of it I've shared here, but the truth is, is that no matter who you are, I promise that you will identify with the characters. Yeah, because there's so much of us and our current contemporary struggle that we have. And I think that that's what makes it so compelling. And so relevant. I mean, I wrote this in 2019. But it seems like that was written today. Yeah, I

Seth Price 37:44

100% 100%. Yeah,

Brandon Andress 37:45

I think that people can identify with the nuance and the struggle. And I think one of the things that, you know, getting into this discussion about fiction, and why would you want to write fiction, and I didn't even give you the best answer of all of it is because I didn't realize this ahead of time, I kind of discovered it, as I wrote, but fiction is incredibly subversive. And what I mean by that is that with nonfiction, I just write what I know, like I write down what's in my head on a piece of paper. And that's where you agree or disagree. With fiction, you're weaving together a story with color and shape and emotion and nuance and background and story. And there's so much more complexity. And there's so much you understand why a person's making the decision they're making you understand where they came from, what what forces are at work that made them make that decision, and it gives you an opportunity. Like while you're learning a deeper kind of meta truth about this, you're understanding the complexities of relationship, your understanding how a person can perceive another person and how a person came to the decision they did. And I find it so incredibly, because it makes you feel what they feel it puts you in their skin and it allows for an enormous amount of empathy. Which I think me writing a nonfiction piece people miss the entire point or they just dismiss it before they even get to it but with this I'm having people from across the ideological spectrum wrestling with these ideas that they are engaging with them like they never have

Seth Price 39:29

Who is the woman in the video the teaser video on Facebook I have reverse image search her name or her picture as best I can. I can't figure it out. Did who is that is it like stock and you made it or what is that?

Brandon Andress 39:44

Yeah, it's it's a stock video and it's the most god awful stock image because it looks like a link lake water but I manipulated all the color and made it so you did that? Yeah, I made the video and then my friend When I did outside the walls podcast and I had a couple of other hosts, one was Sarah dismore, she did the voiceover. So yeah, I just kind of love doing that creative stuff. And I'm like, Dude, I'm gonna make an epic trailer to the book. And people can find that video on YouTube if you just type in what can't be hidden. Or Brandon Andrus that comes up, like a 32nd promo video, but yeah, yeah, yeah, it's good. Video, bro.

Seth Price 40:26

It's good. So if you're willing, I would like to ask you specific questions. And you alluded to it at the beginning, if you're willing, but after probably I have you plugged the places, because I do have specific questions. And I could call you tomorrow on the cell phone, but then no one else would benefit. And for those people that are cheating, just stop listening after a bit, and I'll tell you when. But I want to ask you the same two questions that I asked everybody that I have on the show this year? And maybe maybe there'll be easy, maybe they won't. So what do you feel like we should be talking about as a body of people that believe things, so in this case, we'll we'll call it church, it could really be anything. And that if we don't in the current environment that we live in, it's going to cause damage in a way that if we continue, and you alluded to this at the beginning, you know, you people have their their self implied. Here's what they mean. And I'm done with them. They said that they don't believe in the COVID vaccine. So obviously, they're stupid. And so no one else matters. I don't care what they think about anything, or, or in my case, Oklahoma beat Texas. And so now everybody that doesn't think Texas is the best football team is instantaneously dumb to me. That's a, that's not accurate, but it's accurate. It is accurate. What do you feel like? Are those things that need to be spoken about? And I asked the question as a play on a sarcastic play on words, or just the name of the show? Because I realized, after all those years, I really dropped the ball on using that.

Brandon Andress 41:54

Yeah, that's a fantastic question. I think, and I'm just going to answer it for what's right now on my radar, and how I'm feeling. And actually today, I really thought this, I thought, this, this has to be it or we're not going to have a future. I really believe that we have to get better at the dialectic, we have to get better at coming to the table with people with different perspectives and ideas, and a posture of humility, and be able to have conversations about different ideas and work through that together to find greater truth, and to learn from each other. And I really believe it, because I think, you know, I'll give you a couple of examples. So I'm doing another podcast. It's called the way it ought to be podcast. And this past week, we were talking about canceled culture. And so we're just kind of taking on these great big ideas each week. And it's like, there's no way you could tackle it in 45 minutes, but we're giving a good effort. It just the whole premise of the show is I totally get that Paul sitting down. And no, we don't come in prepared. There's no notes, there's no outline. And it's like a given take of like wrestling through these big ideas of saying how do we come to a greater truth? And what does the third way of Jesus look like in the midst of that? And so, this past week, we got a note from someone who was saying, you know, and I think that this is very intuitive question, but she said, What do you do about you guys being like white guys and your privilege, and coming from a privileged position and talking about canceled culture? And, and I just thought it, you know, at the beginning of her comments, and I know, she was completely kidding, but she said, I hope you guys don't cancel me for pushing on this. And I thought, this is exactly in one sense, the problem we have and not saying that she was part of the problem, but this is the way we're wired is we think that we can hardly say anything, or even have a critique of an idea. Yeah, without fear of being cancelled. But then I thought, God bless her for being able to say I'm joining you guys at the table now and I'm going to bring my opinion of what I'm thinking and we're going to hear that we're gonna wrestle with it because we want to hear her perspective and things we haven't considered. And I in so then let's contrast it so I shared another in another group I shared today about this interview that I listened to with Joe Rogan. And jewel, and it was one of the most mind blowing interviews with jewel i It was amazing. She's so wise and so introspective and had great stories. And I shared it with people and I said you gotta listen to this interview. It's so life giving, it's so good. People are like not listening and Joe Rogan, boom, shut it down, not engaged. And I thought, this is truly where we're at. Like, we're, we've reached conclusions about people, rightly or wrongly, sometimes it's bad information. But sometimes, you know, they may be a tough person to deal with, they may have controversial ideas. But you know, I kind of hunger, those kind of engagements, I really, there are so many people that I've met over my life. Because I grew up in a small church of 100 people, I had very small ideas. When I went to college, I had very small ideas when I went to this college that started expanding my mind and challenging me. And over that time, I've met people that have introduced ideas that have challenged me so deeply, and I thought, my God, they're, they've got to be wrong, or they're crazy, or, and what come to find out it's like, it's expanded my mind expanded my thinking, expanded my capacity to appreciate cultures and, and great diversity of ideas and people. And I think, if I had stayed insulated, if I had stayed in that place where I was like, screw that I'm not going to engage with that person. I wonder how much of a deficit I would have been in my life of not being able to grow? It doesn't mean that whenever you have, you know, a dialog whenever you enter into this dialectic, it doesn't mean you have to agree on the ideas. That's not the point. The point is, is there's a an honest, hopefully humble, given take of respecting and learning from each other. And that's what I feel like right now. We need so deeply.

Seth Price 46:45

Yeah. And I would also say, the book actually tackles that quite well. The ramification of not listening to people. Yeah, quite well, actually. That should be the elevator pitch, not the other one. That should just tell that story about Joe Rogan and be like, and that's what you're going to get by chapter three. So yeah, no, I agree with that. I actually was in a different group as well. Someone posted something about a Mark Driscoll texts that he'd written on critical race theory as he plans to take it apart. And the only the way I'm sure that Mark Driscoll can answer and they're like, yes, sign me out. I'm not doing I was like, I'll download it. It's free for the weekend. I mean, I'll, I'll read it. I'm sure I can learn something. I have no doubt in my mind that Driscoll and I are going to come to massively different conclusions. Yeah, no problem. But he's also brilliant. Teachers, I also happen to think he's manipulative, but that doesn't mean that he's not obviously charismatic and brilliant. I just don't,

Brandon Andress 47:45

it doesn't mean that he can ultimately change and soften his heart. Oh,

Seth Price 47:49

God, How amazing would that be? Yeah, and I think

Brandon Andress 47:53

that's the other thing my book wrestles with is that, you know, based on our own convention, we don't see any possibility of X person on that side of the, you know, on that side of the aisle on that extreme position ever changing? And the truth is, is that what we see, biblically, is just the opposite. We see loads of hard hearted people loads of self righteous, you know, holier than now, you know, In Paul's case, someone who actually killed Christians. Yeah, changing. And I think that I always hold out hope that even with, I mean, you know, we say this, and maybe sometimes we say it as a cliche. And maybe sometimes people don't really mean it, maybe sometimes I haven't meant it. But I really have been that person, man, I really been that person who's been on the wrong side of a lot of stuff. And I've been an ass during that time. And I've probably been the person a lot of people said, This guy has no hope. There's no way of changing his narrow minded fundamentalism. Yeah. Yeah. Well, people can change.

Seth Price 49:05

Yeah, I did not listen to your episode on Kancil culture, but I do have an opinion. And it's this because my son and I've actually talked about this because he wants to have social media accounts and that type of stuff. And I'm trying to make him understand. You can't take it off the internet. Like, the stuff that I've done with this podcast, those words exist. And even listening back to the first years, some of my questions or whatnot on like, that's not even a question I care about anymore. And actually, I'm pretty sure that I was wrong and even asking the question, but I think something should be canceled. Let's say bigotry and racism and homophobia and that type of stuff. But I'm also allowed to learn from my mistakes. Without getting canceled not should I choose not to learn from a mistake and instead dig in and refuse to listen to other points of views then maybe, but I honestly think what's the word, I'm going to steal the term from my boss, I'm going to assume positive intent until you show me that I shouldn't. I will assume positive intent like that. I'm gonna assume that person did not intentionally mean to hurt anyone. Tell me more. And then when I realized that you either did or you didn't, okay, maybe then we make a decision on what gets canceled, what doesn't. But

Brandon Andress 50:21

yeah, I mean, it's, it's a complex one. And I'm not going to get into all the ins and outs of it, because it's out there on my podcast, where I'm at on it. But, you know, I think that where I stand in this kind of goes back to the whole series a little bit is that my position early on in that series was that if I have a belief that God has forgiven all people for all time, preemptively, and if God has not given me that God has not given me the task of going out and being the Minister of forgiveness, but rather the Minister of reconciliation, the truth is, is that my only responsibility is to be one who is active, restoring people in relationships. I don't need to be the arbiter of forgiveness, I don't need to be the decider of forgiveness. And so, you know, I can literally be across the table from the hardest heart, the person who gives me a finger, the person who says I will disagree with you hand over fist, and I'm like, you know, that's fine. I'm, I still believe God loves you. And I still believe that we can find a common ground somewhere. And I, that's my hope. through any of this is that add on? No. And I, obviously this is the heart of the book, too. I mean, it's really a book about relationships and trying to work through the nuance of our differences and to see the other differently, and not to necessarily right off people, because sometimes it's difficult to understand what a person is going through. Yeah, and I know, that's what hopefully will shine through. And yes, people. Yeah, sometimes

Seth Price 51:57

we let our lamps and refuse to share them. So yeah. So alright, so when you try to explain or wrap words around what God is, what do you say to that?

Brandon Andress 52:15

I mean, the easy answer, which is probably the most correct, but I don't think that many of us even understand this. I'm just gonna say it, it got it is love. I don't think that any of us understand that. I think we come with such fractured lenses, broken lenses, and the light kind of permeates through that in different ways. And we don't see it clearly. And honestly, a lot of the relationships we've had in the past with people who are supposed to love us probably let us down or show just, you know, very finite versions of what love could be. And that's why I kind of hold out hope that whenever you hear in the Bible, it says every knee will bow and every tongue will confess it won't be because it's coerced, or people are afraid it'll be because people will finally see love, unveiled love unrestricted. And people will say, Oh, my God, I never knew and it won't be just one, it'll be all of us. I think that our we are so limited and understanding what that kind of love is. In I think that there are times where maybe you get a glimpse of it in your life, right, and it brings tears to your eyes. And, and it changes you. I mean, there's no quite some, it's like that veil that's pierced, and you just get a little bit of a glimpse of and, and you can feel it in it. And I can feel it like right here in my chest man and, and it's that love that. I actually I don't have many of these moments in my life. But surprisingly, I had one. Two or three weeks ago, I was walking, I just took a walk in my neighborhood. And I was walking down the road. And there were big trees in the distance and the sunlight was piercing through and the lights were the rays were coming through and there was a girl riding her bicycle. Asked me and and I just thought it was just this overwhelming sense of just, I was enveloped by this immensity, this, this immensity of love that I thought, it's, it's all gonna be alright. It's all gonna be alright. And but I don't think that we live like that, right? So whenever we say what God is God's love, but do who knows?

Seth Price 54:32

Works for me. So plug the places and plug all the plug bubbles that you need to plug. And then I do want to ask you some specific questions. And for those listening, after the plug the plug bubbles, there's going to be that thing that says you should sign up for Patreon and that type of stuff. And you should have already done that because then you don't have to listen to the other stuff. You can just you get all the versions of the show, including the one with all the items that I that I didn't edit out. So where do you want to plug the places to people and then we'll go into that,

Brandon Andress 55:00

yeah, so I've taken a different approach with this launch more than anything, I could have taken the easy route. But I've taken the way harder route I, I, I've been begging people to engage locally at their local bookstore. And if if they don't have it on the shelf, then just ask the person to order it. And they'll get it, they'll they'll deliver it to the store, and we're supporting local business. And it's been so gratifying because I've had people all across the United States, ordering it from their local bookstore. And it's been amazing. So that's the biggest thing because look, I'm not against Amazon, I use it times where I can't get things locally, right. So I'm not anti, I really don't feel like putting more bucks and basis is pocket. But it you can get it everywhere online. So you know, the Barnes and Nobles, the indiebound, the Amazon bookshop.org, anywhere and everywhere. I encourage people to get it. But if you can, and if you have the ability to buy it local at your bookstore, then please, please, please do that.

Seth Price 56:06

Okay, is there an easy way for people to do that? Or they just need to go like find their local bookstores or like a repository that says no, here's my here's my,

Brandon Andress 56:15

yeah, the easiest thing is to go to bookshop.org, which is really incredible. It it even helps fund local bookstores. Indie bound is another place I N D, ie bound.org. And you can enter your zip code, it tells you what your local bookstore is. That's amazing. And I think you can buy it through indiebound. And it goes through your local bookstore to arrive at your local bookstore

Seth Price 56:38

and you show up and get it. Yeah, yeah. So I

Brandon Andress 56:41

mean, there was to do it. I know it's way harder. But let's be honest, during COVID, a lot of our mom and pop shops, I've had a harder time making it through this. And so I really just want to support them as much as

Seth Price 56:53

I can. Yeah, no, that makes sense. Cool. Cool. Good. All right. So people, I'm gonna give you one last warning. Don't be here if you don't want to run the book. And honestly, you should buy the book.

Brandon Andress 57:06

Be done right now. Because everything in the book is a spoiler. And you want you want.

Seth Price 57:13

So you're probably thinking, wow, in the middle there, there's usually an ad break. So that's coming right now. Because, as promised, there are some questions here in just a few seconds, maybe a minute or so that may break the book for some of you. And so if you haven't read the book, and you want to stop listening, right now, and do the things you need to but outside of that quick ad break. We'll be back. And Brendon I'll discuss the book a little bit further detail. In brief. Here we go.

Unknown 57:48

Except, grace, your heart has Shine.

Seth Price 58:02

Yeah, well, I don't know if my questions will spoil many things. Maybe they will. But they are like as again, as I've been reading it back through. Like, Why is everybody so mad? Like it's like a powder keg. Like where are these people coming from that they are just at base level nine. One thing happens and let's kill everybody. Like, why is everyone here so mad?

Brandon Andress 58:28

Because it's an allegory. Because it's representative of us, man. Oh, I'm just so yeah, no, the people in the town the towns called Patrice every name in the book mean something. Every single thing ever. I mean, I'm telling you literally everything. Even things that you'll probably never find in the book are hidden in the book like Easter eggs. It's all there. Like what? I

Seth Price 58:57

know it's fine.

Brandon Andress 58:58

I could tell you why. But if people have already read it, then they're probably curious. Yeah. There's this one line. Thorough is with Odigo. And they're looking at the water. The waves are coming in. And they're looking at the rocks below. And she's noticing how and she uses the word bekende. And she says that the waves are beckoning the rock. And as soon as that's at the end of the chapter, and as soon as you start the next chapter, it's about OHCI. And Sophia, and it's when she is yelling out in the distance. And she and it says that Sophia was beckoning OHCI and it's a direct tie into the waves are smoothing the rocks. I'm using that word beckoning, and I'm tying it to what's going on with Sophia and Og. She's the wave that's washing over him knocking off his sharp edges and making him smooth and refining him. I mean, it's just, there are a lot of little things, but I mean, there are things that are even bigger and more noticeable, but that's like little hints Like little I'll give you one more if you want to hear it. Sure. I'm

Seth Price 1:00:02

sure I won't.

Brandon Andress 1:00:05

So, at the very end of the book, it's kind of a shocker. And people are like, Okay, what happened and I don't want to go into that part here. But people are trying to wrestle through it. They realize that something she's done. So she's had an experience of some sort. And people are like, Well, were there any clues throughout the beginning through this, that there was something off? And I said, Yeah, I mean, at the beginning that the narrator says that thorough was born on the island. Probably in the next chapter or two, Thoreau says that she came to the island as a little girl. Yeah. And then later, the narrator says that she came to the island as a little girl. And it's like, the narrator kind of corrects her story, because it's very fluid, this thing, like, so anyway, there's things like that, that are just hidden throughout that most people wouldn't catch the first time through. Yeah.

Seth Price 1:01:01

So this painting in the council room? Yeah. Who painted this?

Brandon Andress 1:01:06

It like in real life?

Seth Price 1:01:07

Yeah. Like, I understand the purpose that it serves. But its origination. Like everything else in the island was was built, you know, people show up and they make the thing that wasn't made. It was there, like broad.

Brandon Andress 1:01:23

Okay, so you're wondering who painted it on the island?

Seth Price 1:01:26

Yeah, yeah. Yeah. So like, you know, it's like a picture of, you know, a man and a boat and whatnot. Like, everything else that is created in Katrina. exists because it was created by the people there. But not that.

Brandon Andress 1:01:42

Yeah, actually, it was. I mean, we I miss. Oh, yeah. So he says that his dad painted it. So NUMA painted?

Seth Price 1:01:51

Oh, you're right. Never mind. Just kidding. Just, it's just too many things. Too many things in my head. Too many things in my head. Yeah, where,

Brandon Andress 1:02:01

but I will tell you one thing about that painting is that and this is kind of an interesting tie in. So people who have read the book will think that I think that they'll think this is pretty cool. And I'm actually I'm not not looking at you on purpose. I'm looking for that painting on my phone, because I have it. But nonetheless, I reached a point in the book where I was like, you know, I really want this character who's kind of wrestling through the situation to have something that he's maybe looking at, you know, there's ups. There's the painting, you can see it. Right? So something that he's looking at that he's wrestling with, and did you watch Breaking Bad? All of it? All right, so there's this one point where there's a picture and Walter White's house, and it's a dad, who's in a rowboat, and he's leaving the shore and his wife and two kids are standing there waving at him, as he's leaving in the weather behind him looks really treacherous. And, you know, it's kind of representative of Walter White and where he's at in his life. He's leaving his family, he's going off into this treacherous you know, whatever. It's kind of predictive. Yeah. Foreshadowing.

Seth Price 1:03:13

So Oh, he is the one that knocks

Brandon Andress 1:03:18

I suppose. Kind of did. But so I was thinking about that. And I'm like, You know what, I would love to have a painting on the wall that he's wrestling with. And so I just kind of started digging around. And I found this painting that was online. And I'm like, it was exactly what I described in the book. It was a man sitting in a boat looking at a young girl or a boy. And in the distance there literally was boats on the horizon. And as you look in his boat, the sail is down. So it's like I used that entire real life painting as an image to tell a story about people think that their hope is on the horizon. Yeah. All the while. I'm sorry that his piece is on the horizon. But all the while to the boat. Pete has been right there with him the whole time. Yeah. I just thought the picture worked

Seth Price 1:04:11

brilliantly. Yeah, yeah. This is not a spoiler related question, but just for me to use so I think I talked about some of the stuff that I deal with with my with my oldest with my son with with some of his medic, maybe I have maybe I can't remember if I have or not. But Tyron is the hardest person for me to read in the book because of my relationship with my son. It's heartbreaking. Yeah. Not not necessarily a spoiler, maybe. I don't know. But just for me to you like it is like I struggled to read those parts. Can't find my words. fumbled fumbly words. So

Brandon Andress 1:04:51

the thing that's interesting to me about that, Seth, is that this has been the most shocking part for me hearing from readers is that People are having experiences with it that are not what I intended or what I tried to elicit, right? Like I'm writing it from a burden, but I understand completely how someone's reading it. And it's speaking to them at a completely. It's very parable, like in that sense, right? You can look at it from a lot of different angles. And there's truth being spoken to different people of all times from different backgrounds. Yeah. But and I think that that's fascinating that you're picking up on that in a very real way.

Seth Price 1:05:34

Yeah. Yeah, there was one morning, I have literally argued in such a way. And then I read the same, because I've been reading chapters before I leave for work. That's that's how I've been able to triage doing the thing that I'm doing is read read after the bus comes and then have time to go to work and then edit at lunch? So but yeah, yeah. So I know the last time I talked to you, you weren't certain if there would be more beyond where you ended this one, have you made a decision if there will be or you're still at a spot where you're like, Yeah, I need to mow the grass again, and three years from now and have another lightning bolt

Brandon Andress 1:06:12

on the just in the private discussion group, I put out a poll, and I asked people is this the end of the book? You know, or does it continue? And it was unanimous that people demanded a sequel. And then one person, so

Seth Price 1:06:33

you deleted the group whole group is disbanded?

Brandon Andress 1:06:37

And one person said, you know, it's, it's absolutely done, and was very upset that I would even consider, because they thought it ended perfectly, not, not everything needs to have a bow on it. And it's okay to, to have to wrestle with how it ends. And I agree with everybody. But to answer your question, when I finished this, I wrote it in and yes, it is written as a quasi cliffhanger, or a real cliffhanger. And I ended it knowing that it was a period at the end of the sentence that I was completely done. And then it was one complete idea, and that there was nothing beyond that. And that is true. That is absolutely true. So it's like, whatever people read in this, this is it. This is what I want people to walk away from and wrestle with. Probably about six months ago, I sat at my desk, and I began piecing together the sequel. And because I know all of the parts of it, and it's it's complete on paper. And it's completely done. So it really becomes the question. So I'll tell you, and I'll tell you, those who are still listening, who are either cheating, because you haven't read it, you want to continue to shame

Seth Price 1:07:57

on you. Okay, Mark.

Brandon Andress 1:08:01

The only thing that I care about doing with us is not only sit this way, the only thing that I care about with this book is being honest to my autobiography. The first one was 100%, driven by my story, and it followed me all the way up into the present. So you know if there's a sequel than it has to be, so what does that look like? Here moving forward, which makes it a little bit more difficult to navigate, because I haven't lived it. But I have a really good idea of what that looks like. And so for me, the only thing that drives this is an honesty about me and my own story and where I see myself and where I need to go. And then how is that conveyed creatively through relatable characters. And so, you know, to answer the one person who said, you absolutely cannot because it doesn't need to be wrapped up in a perfect bow every time because the fear is, is that oh, you continue a sequel, and then it works to it's perfectly natural, beautiful conclusion. And he you know, and then the two Caprio thereafter. Yeah. Yeah. And I can tell you that it is crazier than the ending of this one. And it's not tight and it would almost be fun to write it because in much the same way that you really couldn't guess where the first one was going. No one would guess where this one's going at all. I think it's even crazier. My last part about this My only fear about doing it is that there is a quaintness to this first book, what can't be hidden there's a quaintness and a simplicity and a beauty to it. That I unless I was really intentional, I think it's going to be harder to recapture that quaintness. And that's what I'm doing. You're full of Yeah. Is that it? It? It can't the next book can't be this one. It can't be it because of the way that it ends. So yeah. Yeah, the answer is maybe.

Seth Price 1:10:15

Solid, maybe? Yeah. Yeah. Good. Good. You enjoyed writing it, then?

Brandon Andress 1:10:20

Yeah, I really did. Because it it. It caused me to have to see differently. Because A, like whenever I sat down the first day, and I thought, oh, here we go, I'm going to start writing this. And I thought, I put my fingers on the keys. And then I backed up, and I rocked back in my chair. And I thought, What am I looking at here, just, you have to see it, and you have to feel it, and you have to taste it and touch it and hear it, and you have to be there. And I had not transplanted myself into that environment. And so that was a quick reorientation of saying, you have to fully be present in this story in this environment. So you can let people experience it and feel it with you all the blood, the tears, the whole thing, you know, I don't know if you felt it, but did you feel it? Like people tell me like whenever we're reading it, like we can see it, you're, it's very vivid, it's, we can see where we're at. We can feel what they are feeling. Yeah, no, that was the intention.

Seth Price 1:11:29

Definitely. Yeah. Definitely. Yeah. Like, I'm, like I, but I think the reason and so we mean, do you mean like the way that it's written is in such a way that I can insert myself in and literally like, so like that picture that you showed me is not the way that I pictured that picture in my head. Mine is, for some reason, zoomed out probably 30 yards from that. Oh, that that one's a crop. Sorry. No, either way. No, like, just the perspect like, far away, almost like I'm at the top of the game of the World Series. It's happening right now. Like, I know, those are players down there. And I know they're swinging bats. But I it's fuzzy, but I'm well aware of what it is. And like there's a story. For me, that picture doesn't matter as much as the story behind what the picture is actually portraying. But like, like the way that you describe like the pine trees and the bird that's that's basically palling alone that that has no fear, which is, which is crazy for birds, because they're awful skittish, they usually don't come up to people. You know what I mean? Like, it is very disruptive. Yeah. And easy to get in there. Very easy to get in. i Yeah, it's, but I also have a fairly vivid imagination. I don't know that everybody reads the way that I do. Because I bite off small chunks, and then I ruminate on it. And then I bite off another huge chunk. But it's that way, with everything that I read. I feel like I forget who it was one time, I was describing why Midland Texas can be beautiful, as I was talking about noxious fumes, but the sun rising through it, which made it beautiful. And the guests on the show was like, and that's why we know there's a God because somehow you look at the desert, and you found beauty in it. And he's like, and I'm not going to take that away from you. So

Brandon Andress 1:13:17

yeah, you know, the funny thing is that it's good that you read it that way, because I had another guy who read it, who I don't know, but he he took an early copy of it and wanted to be a part of the launch team. He wrote me a note after he was finished, and he said, that was really kind of difficult, was like, Oh crap, is it? What do you what do you mean? And he said, No, no, he said, It was phenomenal. But he said, I approached this book, like I was going to read it on the beach. He said, I figured out after like two chapters. Okay, I got to start over. I'm going to get out my notebook. And I'm just gonna start taking notes. And, you know, that's the thing. But again, I mean, you know, if

Seth Price 1:14:04

I did the same thing, though, as I was reading it, I don't know, if you go back and look at your text, I would read a chapter and I would text you things that didn't read a chapter. Right, right, right. Yeah,

Brandon Andress 1:14:14

I think that's great. But again, I want people just to, it's whatever you want to get out of it. You know, if you want to read and have a great time reading it and hopefully it's a page turner thriller, great. If you want to dig in deep and find, you know, the complexity and like, make it self evaluative and all of that, then it's there as well.

Seth Price 1:14:34

Yeah. Good. Good. Good. Good. Brandon. I've enjoyed talking with you very much.

Brandon Andress 1:14:40

Yeah, no, I appreciate it. I appreciate you, your audience. I, you know, I guess my pitch here is that look, it's superduper hard. I feel like to try to convey something about a fiction book and I haven't figured out the magic yet about how to do it. I don't

Seth Price 1:14:57

know how to do it without just overtly doing spoilers like I did an episode we talked about Pixar soul. I just started to be like, I don't know how to do this without doing this. And I'm about to do this again. So on election day, I'm bringing on Kathy and Jr, Forrest arrows. Kathy Kong, and then Jr. And we're gonna talk about midnight mass. And there's just spoilers. It's don't listen, just skip the dang thing. If you don't

Brandon Andress 1:15:23

know, I mean, people have had time, right? So I mean,

Seth Price 1:15:25

like six weeks. But I just, I don't care if people like if you just don't listen, if you don't want to listen. There's just so much in there. But that's also deeply allegorical as well. Oh, yeah. Completely. Yeah. Yeah, I

Brandon Andress 1:15:39

didn't finish the last episode yet. Oh, my gosh, this is crazy. I had to take a break. But yeah, no, I was just gonna say that. More than anything, I just want to make a pitch to the listeners and just say, you know, just trust me. I mean, it's worth it. It's worth it to read it. It's it. It's meaningful. It's deep. And I promise that it's entertaining. And so that's the big thing. I just want people to trust me. I wish I could tell you so much more. And I wish I could tell you all of the crazy things. Yeah, yeah. We're not going to but

Seth Price 1:16:15

just trust. Yeah. Yeah. Good. Thank you, my friend. I appreciate your time tonight.

Brandon Andress 1:16:19

Thanks. Good. See ya.

Unknown 1:16:22

There's a blood there is blood. Come clean again.

Seth Price 1:16:53

Now, I haven't added it up. But there are hundreds of 1000s, if not millions of podcasts on the internet. And I am humbled that you continue to download this one. This is your first time here. Please know that there are transcripts of these shows. Not always in real time, but I do my best. And if you go back in the logs, you can find transcripts for pretty much any episode that you'd like. The show is recorded and edited by me, but it is produced by the patrons supporters of the show. That is one of the best if not the best way that you can support the show. If you get anything at all out of these episodes, if you think on them, or if you you know you're out and about and you tell your friends about it or Hey, mom, dad, brother, sister, friend, boss, Pastor, here's what I heard, what are your thoughts on that? If this is helping you in any way, and it is helping me consider supporting the show in that manner. It is extremely inexpensive, but collectively, it is so very much helpful for you. I pray that you are blessed. You know that you're cherished and beloved. We'll talk soon

Unknown 1:17:57

but I'd rathe

Shoutin' in the Fire with Danté Stewart / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the audio


Danté Stewart 0:00

When we are talking about the church doing what seems to be right in moral, you know, it is a tall task to ask for, you know, at every point in history, we would say that the church has been critical, you know, for transformation. But also the church has been integral to these aspects of terror. There is no slavery and a history of racial subjugation without the theological justification of believing that black people are chattel—your property. You know, there is no, in some sense, you know, wealth gap or incarceration rate without these ideas of politics, and punishment, and morality, much rooted in these kinds of ideas of divine nature. There is nobody shooting somebody and beating somebody up that's trans and gay, without the religious idea of whose body is worthy of love and whose body is worthy of death and condemnation. You know, there's always this religious theological justification. And so the church, we must be honest about that. And we must allow other people to see our stories and allow other people to tell our stories for us. And try as best we can, you know, to tell some type of better stories, and become the answers to the problems, many times, that we created and protected and gave justification for.

Seth Price 1:44

Everybody, welcome back to the show. I'm Seth. This is the podcast. I'm sitting here. A six year old is staring at me. Let's see. Anyway, that's life, right, trying to record an intro. Be all professional, with an audience. Anyhow, welcome. I'm so glad that you're here. Today. I welcome to the show, Dante Stewart. He wrote a book called shouting in the fire. It's very hard book to read. At least it was for me. And you'll hear a bit of that inner woven throughout the episode. Now, a couple of disclaimers as you listen to this one, he had his newborn child with him. And because of that, I've edited some things out just for privacy. I felt like that was what I'd want someone to do for me. But you will still hear the baby in the background a little bit here and there. And that's okay. Not a big deal. Anyhow, let's do this. Yes, anyway, man, welcome to the podcast. I'm glad you're here. I'm excited to talk to you. And yeah, wonderful. Thank you for having me. But there will be probably people like me that haven't read your book, because it isn't out yet. That want to know a little about you. And so when you try to explain, like, what and who you are, what is that?

Danté Stewart 3:13

Yeah, sure. I'm a writer and a minister. And that's, that's kind of two of the main roles that I'm in right now. And I guess two main kind of vocational roles, and a student, you know, and trying to somehow find a way to do as best I can, and all three of those areas, or whatnot, not just exclusively, one of those areas. Because I feel like in some sense, I mean, all three of those areas, both writer, minister and student is just reflects so much of where I come from. Yeah. And where I'm going what I'm trying to become every single day.

Seth Price 3:52

Yeah, which do you prefer to be writer, Minister, students?

Danté Stewart 3:56

Oh, I love them. No lie, I hang a lie. Because like, I talked to my friends, my former teammates and things like that. And, you know, we always, in some sense, kind of looking back in the past and thinking about where we're at right now, you know, six, seven years removed from football and from school and things like that. And some of us have played in NFL, some of us, you know, going into business, some of us have, you know, going into real estate, some have gone into starting their own businesses, their own gyms and things like that. And I'm the one out the bunch, who's the writer. A lot of them, many of them have gone into ministry as well. So we talk kind of, you know, about dreams and dreaming and things like that. As I say, you know, I'm living a dream there's nothing you know, there's there's I mean, all three of those roles are so integral to how I understand myself more such self conception as and as it relates to what I'm trying to become, you know, and so yeah, I don't think I don't think That would be who I was without all three of those because they represent three kind of various experiences of the world and even of myself and they teach me so much so, yeah, but I really like to write I love to write.

Seth Price 5:11

I didn't Google your career in South Carolina. What exactly did you play on the football team?

Danté Stewart 5:18

Cool. I like it that way. Yeah. It's cool. It's cool. I played cornerback. Okay. Yes, I played defensive back. You know, football pretty good.

Seth Price 5:28

Well, I'm from West Texas played ball all throughout high school. Okay. Yes, I play corner. Yeah, but yeah, Friday, you know, you don't miss a Friday. You can miss Sunday in my Southern Baptist church, but you don't mess Friday?

Danté Stewart 5:39

Yeah. Especially in Texas. No,

Seth Price 5:43

yo, yeah, you get out of wills and that type of stuff. You know?

Danté Stewart 5:47

Yeah. Yeah, for, you know, I always wanted to look at like Texas football, because I don't I don't even recall any of my teammates, man from Texas. We just never recruited, like, they were always like Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina. That's a different, you know, and then, you know, up north, in some areas further as we went, you know, Louisiana, and things like that. I mean, we had spurts of like California and from different places, but I don't remember. I mean, maybe some guys being from Texas, but yeah,

Seth Price 6:18

it's a different animal.

Danté Stewart 6:21

Texas. Oh, no, no, I think I think I think sfootball Because I don't I mean, I would consider Texas the south. But I mean, like the as far as like the East Coast. Got some good, good football. Oh, Vietnam.

Seth Price 6:33

Oh, definitely. Everybody.

Danté Stewart 6:34

I know everybody talks about?

Seth Price 6:38

No. So here's what I mean by I mean, different animals, like I grew up. And the stadiums were like holding 60,000 people for high school football. What? Yeah, maybe it's 45. No, I'm sure doesn't do that. It might be 45. I might be wrong. It's 40. Somewhere between 45 and 60. So like when I say it's a different animal, like, I was literally at a UVA game over the weekend. And I was like, I wonder how many people sit here and I'm like, Oh, this is less than homecoming. So like, like, like to go from being good in Texas football to then playing it at really most colleges. It's like, Oh, I see you like so it's not intimidating is what I mean, it's a different animal. Because if you're from a big city, you know, then you walk in, you're like, Oh, cool. Here we go. Let's go. I've had this many people booing me before, or yell before me. Anyway, not why I brought you on. So you wrote a book. And I referenced for, before I hit the record button on the video that like, I stopped halfway through halfway through. And normally, normally don't say I, I will read every word of every book before I talked to it to an author. And I tried three times to read through your book. In each time, I got about 48% in and I only know the percentage, not the page number, because that's how the Kindle app works. And so I don't actually know how many pages I am in. And I just got froak so frustrated at a book that's interwoven with like theology and autobiography. And like how, how I never I understand that stuff exists now. But I never remember seeing it when I should have seen it. You know what I mean? So can you talk to me a bit about like the book, why it exists? And like, why you felt the need to sit down and because there's some stories in there that I'm like, man, like, like, like, even like I was saying about the story earlier today. We were watching not today. Last night, we were watching a show my wife and there was some kids that pulled over and they got shot out and I'm like I just read about that in a book. You talking about like a story in the book, like you're pulled over and some wrong with the car, some dude, Yellin And then just shots fired, like for what I just pulled over for a minute, just needed a minute, but look at the, you know, so why, why did you feel the need to like, kind of go into the book?

Danté Stewart 8:57

Yeah, I think first of all, for First, thank you for having me on with you. Appreciate that. So I think for me, you know, writing is oftentimes, you know, many times for many of us is where we make sense of kind of what happened. I'm not really trying to at least in the tradition of writing, I'm thinking not really trying to find answers, per se, but trying to explore things that happened to kind of understand them a little bit better, trying to understand, you know, many of the things that, you know, we went through and things like that. So for me, I felt that, like, there was a uniqueness about, you know, the type of book I wanted to create, particularly, you know, writing a memoir, you know, and thinking about memoir as the genre because we think about, you know, my book is very much you know, Christian, it's a very it's very much a Christian book is very much interwoven with theology and theory and critical reasoning. Question on life and faith in church and society and things like that. But I knew that the book that I wanted to write, I couldn't write it as what we are familiar with in the Christian genre, particularly regarding like, books, that's for pastors and ministry leaders and things like that. And so I wanted to first and foremost write a, a creatively crafted book, that was honest, that was vulnerable, that was creative, that was compelling. That was rigorous and ruthless. and whatnot, that was very particular about my own experiences, and things like that, like, I feel like a lot of Christian books, almost makes our faith in ourselves, the heroes of the story. And as much as we, you know, omit as much as we like to say, you know, there's only one hero, there's that colloquialism, you know, there's only one hero to the store, and that's Jesus. But I think the type of writing that many of us have learned and do, you know, doesn't is I want to call it dishonest, but I don't even know if that's the right word that might be, you know, not in a sense of like, is lying, that type of literature is lying, but it doesn't just tell a human story. It's a very triumphal narrative, that must have winners in the end, that must, you know, have answers in the end that must have application in the end, that must sustain incoherent frameworks, our experience of faith and our experience of God, and things like that, and our experience of the world. And I just felt like, you know, that's just not the type of book I wanted to write, I wanted to write a book that was incredibly black. That was, you know, meaningfully Christian. And did both of those things in very creative in creative ways. That woven narrative and really good storytelling. So yeah,

Seth Price 12:00

yeah, at the beginning of the book, you tell a story about meeting another guy at the beginning of football. And he basically says that they tell you about all the running we're about to do. And I didn't realize it until the second time, I tried to read the book, that that is basically the whole story of the book is you're not fake, literally running, you're just figuratively, running, running from this running from that running from that, unless for some reason, you just didn't write it. And I missed it each time, like the miles that you ran. Well, you talk about running to a military base and back, but yeah, so can you name some of the things that you feel like you're running from, you know, as, as it relates to where you were at at the time, and kind of how that relates to maybe the story of other people, you know, as they read through the book? Yeah, I think,

Danté Stewart 12:49

as a great question, and that's very perceptive reading, um, uh, whatnot, because, I mean, running is a metaphor, that, that, that runs throughout my book, you know, no pun intended. You know, it's in a woven in my own story, you know, whether I found myself at home, or whether in church or with on the football field, or, you know, in different areas, you know, I ran and I think running for me, was, as I write, you know, it was a way to mask so much of the pain and the trauma and the confusion. And even the wounds, you know, and even my failures, that I think that I think, you know, I ran from and that was, that was hard. That was hard to write about. But I knew I had to write that type of book, if I was to find wholeness in my own story, but also, to help other people find wholeness as well, because I think once we can name, you know, once we can name what we're most afraid of, especially as it relates to our own emotional well being our own sense of identity, once we can name what we're most afraid of, then little by little, we can have courage to try and rewrite that story. So for me, running and not running was about learning how to learning to how to be courageous, again, and again, and again and again. And you know, in moments of the stories, you know, there were moments where I ran for myself where I ran from other people. And then there were also moments where I stopped running. What I started to face thing is when I stopped running and started to face things, then I think that's when I found my healing in my liberation. And so, yeah,

Seth Price 14:33

yeah. So I've envisioned different answers to this questions, and it's not really all that weighty. It's more just a curiosity. And it is in the few sentences before the question I actually want to ask so there's a part in there where you talk about you know, you're you're you're meeting new people, you're in like some big white mega church, and so we'll just call it we'll call it passion. Why not? Well, I'll pick on a big on passion, but like I think people know that church like that's the church that's on TV. That's the you know, that's that's what people think of when they think of evangelicalism, at least. I think most of the bulk of the country, that's what they think of, you know, the stuff that you hear on K love and the worship music that sounds like, you know, God's just a mighty God and doesn't actually ever sit with us when we struggle, even though the bulk of the Scripture is actually about limit, and brokenness, and that's okay. Um, so what are you exactly spray painting on trailers around in the neighborhood? Is it as a kid like you, right, that, you know, used to get yelled at for spray painting trailers in the neighborhood? Like, is that like, like people's trailers? Is that like, house trailers? Like, what is that? Like? What do you spray painting?

Danté Stewart 15:41

Yes, like back in the country? who is younger? Yeah, we we really just have black spray paint. And we just like spray paint because words. Yeah, spray paint gang signs, all right. Everything going around, just like finding something to do in the country bread this, like, you know, and then we got some painting and you know, we went around Fair

Seth Price 16:01

enough. I just mean, I'm like, what would you be like? Are you painting people's houses? Like, what do you

Danté Stewart 16:07

say? It's like dalgona? Sin and Grand Theft Auto Center? Going tagging places? Yeah, my street name. is rich.

Seth Price 16:21

Yeah. So you go on to say a few sentences. After that, you know, you were introduced to white Catholics, evangelicals, atheists, progressives, conservatives, and I camera what it says after that, but then what I wrote down, as you say, the thing I didn't realize was that realize was that both of our stories had already been told by this nation in ways that we could later that we would later have to reckon with, we were walking into scripts that had already been written, we were individuals, but we were also performers. What are those scripts? Not just for, for black people, but for the white people as well? Like, what are those scripts that you're referencing? What does that? Like? What are you saying?

Danté Stewart 16:56

Yeah, so that's when, you know, I'm thinking sociologically that, you know, we are, we are individuals, but we also a part of history and history, you know, as Baldwin was, say, as James Bond would say, lives in us. And so when I'm thinking about the scripts, it really grew out of my reading of Richard Hughes, incredible book, myths that America lives by white supremacy and distorted stories that give us meaning. And Richard Hughes, talks about myths, and that myths are not just fiction, which they are. But myths are, you know, those powerful stories that lie at the heart of how we name, see and act within the world. And when you talk about America, and even the kind of religious script is social strip, the razor sharp, the sexual shirt script, the gendered script, the class script, all these scripts, all these stories about what is right, what is more, what is normal, what is good, what is true, what's beautiful, what's to be desired. So many of these scripts centered on what white people thought what white people believe, to matter how white people worship How, how white people make it, how white people do church and things like that. And so the script was that at the heart of the faith in the country, is the perseveration into protection. And the prominence of a certain type of white racial dominance of the social order, the cultural order and a religious order. And so I'm thinking in systems thinking, so in many fields of study, particularly in the fields of study regarding law, and society, and philosophy and sociology, we have to think also, we're not just individuals, but we are individuals who inhabit a history that is inherited. So the New Yorker has this beautiful Hey, see, the Demeter, I think, is the Atlantic actually. So the Atlantic has this really beautiful, beautiful, beautiful series that they're running right now and title inheritance. And if anybody got a chance to check that series out, it's just an amazing, amazing series that particularly thinks about what black people inherit in this country, particularly the the ways in which we learn how to make the world as black feminists, there's Terry on Williamson, right? That that, that the way black people make the world is as much a starting point as any other place that we're talking about in the realm of epistemology and what we know and how we come to know white ways of thinking that's bound to where many of us in those churches found ourselves in which are named to be white social space, has visions and values that they that they believe to be right and that we should all accept and we cannot name because it's the given. It's the I'm given given, yeah. or whatnot. And so it's just like playing sports. You know, I'm an individual, but once I put on a jersey, I'm a part of the story and a history larger than me. And when I step on the field, I step into that story. And in some sense, we want to make sure that story ends with us winning in the end, whatnot. So it's just like life. Football teaches us so much about life, that if we think about this jersey, what is normal, that's just we just put it on and take it off. And we're surrounded by the colors, and we're immersed in this world. Yeah. It would be representative of this idea, these ideas, whiteness, and the ways in which, you know, white people have thought about the world. And so many of us when we go to white college campuses, white churches, oftentimes, you know, we are because we're in this social space, we're caught up in rhythms, we're caught up in ways of seeing the world, you know, that's just based on social and communal relationships. And that insert in turn changes us and changes how we see the world. Yeah. And it reinforces these narratives, or what Richard Hughes would call these stories that give us meaning it reinforces, you know, what people believe about God, what belief people believe about patriotism, what people believe about the world. And so, you know, that's the script, you know, that I think we inherited, that's fundamental to the ideas and notions of purity and morality that so surround our country and our religion. And that's the narratives that I wanted to deconstruct, in a sense of not saying that everything that my book is centered on decrescendos narrow because my book is not my book is not written to white people. It's right written to help white people become better humans, or less racist, or more, more better Christians. My book is particularly written to us as black folks so that we may be seen as fire protected and loved. And so for me, a part of kind of deconstructing that narrative and rewriting that narrative, or retelling that story was about doing what Elizabeth Alexander and her beautiful work inside of the black interior was trying to do. And that is this idea of looking again, at our black lives, looking again, you know, at our stories, looking again, at our humanity, and realizing that we do not just die, but we live and when we live we make something of the world that we live in.

Seth Price 22:20

I have that book. I haven't read it. So book of poetry, right? This guy's a black. Yeah, with the orange face on it. Yeah. Oh, yeah, bro, bro, you got I haven't read it. A friend of mine, a friend of mine recommended it. And it's a friend that I trust. And he's like, Dude, you got to read it. And I said, Okay, and so I bought it and just I haven't read it yet. It's it's over there

Danté Stewart 22:40

by this book. I swear by this book. And I quoted I think to Well, I think I quoted twice, but also quote her, her. Her I quote her

Seth Price 22:50

went to her website, because she's apparently like, done some work with Michelle Obama. She's done a bunch of She's amazing. And I was like, How have I never heard of her?

Danté Stewart 22:58

Yeah, you should get this today have her essay from the New Yorker called the Trayvon generation, um, is one of the last essays in this writing on black life from the New Yorker. So it's called the matter of black lives. I was trying to read it, her her essay, the Trayvon generation, is absolutely stunning. In the black interior, it changed the way I wrote the book. And I think this is, this is why I think there's a certain type of uniqueness about what I was trying to do. And what I felt like I accomplished is that like, you know, I wasn't even trying to make us as black folk heroes in the story. I just wanted to write as honest as possible, centering us and I like to say, okay, what can we learn from us? What can be gained? or what not? How can we look into the interior part of our lives, and scope out the beauty and the love, the joy, the failure, everything that can be exploring in our lives? And what can we gain? And what can what can be gleaned from

Seth Price 23:59

it? So I'm curious, your take on this, because you talked about myths. One of my favorite quotes is from Joseph Campbell. I don't know if you've read any of his stuff, or at all. Do you know the hero's journey? Is that a thing that you know what that is? I'll have to grab your email, I'll send you some stuff. It's, it's if I'm going to overgeneralize it. It's a narrative of like, every pivotal moment in in in usually narrative, and so he takes it from like stories and legends and myths. And so there's like a person that answers a call. They leave here we go. So I do Lord of the Rings. So like, have you seen Lord of the Rings? You know, talking about Lord of the Rings? Yeah. Loader? Yeah. So he answers a call, takes on a big challenge finds divine intervention. So that's going to be Gandalf. It changes who he is, he has to cross in this case, a literal metaphorical bridge where you know, says You shall not pass he ends up becoming change has to answer the call to do so. Something really important that's going to be life altering, and then ultimately does that it breaks him or changes him, and then that person returns home a changed being than the person that so it's just like an endless loop. And that's a way overgeneralization. So, the book that that's in is called the hero with 1000 faces is actually pretty, I like it. But one of my favorite quotes about myth is he says, myth is much more important and true than history. History is just journalism. And you know how reliable that is? Which, yeah, anyway, I

Danté Stewart 25:32

don't know if I agree with it, but it's just a good quote.

Seth Price 25:34

I like it. Yes. It sounds good. Yeah. Sounds Um, well, to he talks about myths being truths that are that are hard to tell in any other way. Like the underlying truth behind the actual historical accuracy. Anyway. So there is where's it at? Let me find that in your book. Hold on. Yeah. So there's a part. And this is about as far as I made it each time. So there's a part in here where you say, I read Cohn and other black theologians. And it was used the word that we learned in school or revelation, Faith did not start in the books and words of those long gone it started at the place of the black body, a place both of divine and destructive revelation. Can you break apart what destructive revelation is?

Danté Stewart 26:22

Yeah, yeah, yeah. So so that came really out of my reading of tunnel has the coats incredible book Between the World and Me, where he has that in the early part of the book kind of early midway through the first chapter, where he says, the black body in America, that we perceive America as the handiwork of God, as the place of God and whatnot. I'm loosely kind of quoting copes. But the black body in America is one of the clearest examples that this country is the work of men. And so when I think about the destructive reality revelation, I'm not talking about of ourselves, I'm thinking particularly about Imani Perry, she writes this beautiful, beautiful essay, entitled, racism is bad, blackness is not. And so for me, that's kind of destructive reality is the estimation that the country has toward our black lives. And we think about, if you think about the way we enter this country, you know, we entered it, as chattel, or as to do Hartman say, you know, I to live in a time of slavery. And what I mean, is this, is that, that, that we're still dealing with the crisis of citizenship, what citizens matter, what citizens don't, who, who's worth it, who's not, whose stories are value, whose stories are not, whose stories must be told and changed and altered, versus whose stories are accepted as factual and true, and should be centered. And so did you shock the revelation is in some senses, Baldwin, I love I love, love, love letter from a region of my mind. And Baldwin, he uses beautiful, beautiful language to talk about, you know, the wages of sin. He says that the wages the same is on every street corner. And then he started naming things. And so like, you know, the world that we have inherited, and the things and the ways that it make us the what it does to us, is that destructive revelation, but I believe that the most important part is the divine revelation. And just like, and I was doing some, some, some some theological thinking right there, particularly, you know, as we talking about traditions of biblical criticism, you know, and thinking about, you know, how we understand the Bible and biblical interpretation and, and I wanted to take seriously that many of these inherited sacred stories are inherited stories of people's lives. So when you start naming people, those people their stories, what their lives portrayed for good or for ill represented a certain type of divine story that was passed on to another person. And so for me, I wanted to take seriously that the lives of black people were divine revelation as well that our literature represented a certain divine revelation of how we named the world, how we saw the world, how we acted within the world, how we thought about our faith, how we thought about society, and embodiment and things like that. And so, yeah, that's that's probably the beginnings of the way I would think about that question.

Seth Price 29:36

Yeah. What? What are you now so you deconstructed from Pentecostalism? You became reformed, which scares the hell out of me. I can't Yeah, that's what I was raised. And and then yeah, what are you now?

Danté Stewart 29:52

Yeah, so like, I'm, I'm on staff. I'm on pastoral staff at a progressive Baptist Church. I'm part of the progressive national bench, okay, uh, whatnot. So I'm very much steel, Pentecostal in orientation. You know, as far as denomination, I'm not Pentecostal. But as far as orientation, I'm very much been accosted in steel, you know, it still tie to, in some sense, in some ways, to many of my upbringing, much of my upbringing. So, you know, I'm not, you know, in some sense, like, I didn't, you know, it wasn't like, you know, for me, like, you know, I'm, like, in some sense, like, took on a new name, you know, in some senses, as much as I felt like, for me, my journey and some people, that's their journey, you know, we have to honor that, as people, we have to, you know, even if it is where it kind of gets kind of messy for us, you know, even as we think about stories in the Hebrew Bible, you know, and stories in the Christian scriptures, I'll never forget this story that you know, that the disciples came with Jesus, and they came another person casting out a devil, a demon in Jesus name, the writer of that text did not give us any social, cultural or religious marker, that we can, in some sense, name that person, or name, their community or name, where they're from, or even in the Hebrew Bible, where we see, you know, lovers of God, or whatnot, people who love God, lovers of God, but they're not a part of, you know, the quote, unquote, religious community that's preserving this story, this particular story, in this particular time, in this particular way. And so for me, you know, I'm not I used to be this type of person, that's like, you know, when I was in those spaces, I used to be just a person that was very stickler about, you know, how people believe what they believe, and things like that, you know, and then, you know, when people be like, you know, in some sense, you know, well, all that matters. Well, I don't know, I just, I'm just not of that persuasion anymore. Yeah. Uh, whatnot. And I'm not of somebody who even cares, certain cares, particularly about doctrinal purity, or denomination of purity, or even religious community purity. But I do think that we should creatively try and build something better than we do, that we, that we inherited, as it relates to our social and faith lives and the type of world we're living in. So that works for some people. But for me, you know, I felt like I needed to go back to the black church, but I wanted to go back to a particular type of black church, particularly progressive black church, that that were, like questions of, you know, where, like, this kind of war warring faith or feel like, you know, like this, like the whole idea of like, I feel like there's something voyeuristic about talking about the holiness of God, or like, or these kind of what people would be like big God or heavy theology. Like there's a certain type of warrior rhythm that like evades the honest tension of living. And I didn't want to, I didn't want to have to think, you know, in some sense, in terms of, you know, what is someone doctrinal stance, I wanted to be standing in the world. Yeah, who I was and work with something better.

Seth Price 33:18

Yeah. Yeah. I want to ask maybe one or two more questions. And, and, and also want to say, for those listening, there is a lot in the book that I'm just uncomfortable asking about, because it's so deeply personal stories, and some of them seem slightly traumatic. And also people should read the book and buy it. I know, you said you didn't write it necessarily for white people. But I know I gained better context for some things from from looking at it and reading it. I'll also say I like what your thoughts are on the Baptist Church there are on the church overall. But um, yeah, I happen to be cooperative Baptist. And one of my favorite parts about Baptist is priesthood of all believers. So you do what you want to do. I'm gonna do what I want to do and just be just, hey, just stop, stop. Hey, Stop, just stop.

Danté Stewart 34:07

I mean, because on a real if you read church history, that's just the reality of the story that we're walking into talk about what Chris Yeah, is that dare I always say, you know, there is no such thing as a singular Christianity. There. There's, there's multiple and multivariate traditions of Christian faith, even this year, even even this year, even to this day. Yeah, we're some look more like Jesus, some live less, some, some are more healthy, some are less healthy, some prioritize certain things, other prioritize other things based on historical social critical circumstances. You know, what, what I think our job is to do is, you know, stay be rooted wherever we're rooted but also critically, you know, examining where we're rooted. Why also, you know, trying to tell a better story with those within our tradition and Those outside of our tradition. Yeah, yes. You know, just think that's a better way.

Seth Price 35:04

Yeah. So final three questions. One is related to something you say in the book, the other two, and this is the risk of having a minister on a preacher on his you may preach, and that's fine, feel free to preach

Danté Stewart 35:16

my brain in my brain. So that's fine. I can't, I can't,

Seth Price 35:19

that's fine. So you write in here. And I think that this is important for the for the country that we happen to live in, you know, slightly below Canada and above Mexico, is you write in here, you learn to see that there's a connection to the body of Jesus being beat in front of his people in public by authorities, being crucified by the state in the experience of black bodies being assaulted and terrorized every day in America, which is true, if you're listening and you disagree. I don't, I don't know why you're still listening. He did not stand with the assaulters. But with the abuse, Jesus didn't stand with the state or religious authorities. And then you go on to talk about dignity and resistance and power and justice and love. What does the church do with that? Like, what, what I mean, I mean, you're holding your daughter, Mike, my son will literally come in, the dogs are gonna start barking here in a minute from school, like, the way that we treat one another. And the apathy that comes from it can't be what the church is, at least that's not what I want to be a part of. So what do we do with that?

Danté Stewart 36:23

I mean, I'm so limited answering that question. I'm just not a type of person that like, you know, I'm a writer, I'm a writer, you know. And so, I just think sometimes the best of writing is the type of writing or thinking, that doesn't necessarily wonder about like the answers, or what do we do? You know, I never forget reading. Octavia Butler, in essence magazine, it was entitled, a few rules for predicting the future. And I think I think, you know, given our history, and the years, particularly the last two years of our lives, collectively, many people are wondering, What will our futures, particularly individually, you know, what, what our futures look like? And collectively, what will our future look like in the singular? And she tells a story of a student coming up to her and asking her, you know, hey, so I was reading your book of the parables parable of the sower and parable, the town? You know, is it that bad? The way you talk about it? You know, as many people would say, your literature was a certain type of apocalyptic genre, you know, it, it dealt with, you know, society, in I think, I think, Eddie Glaude talked about this with Baldwin in his book begin again, in the after times, or whatnot. And so, student x isn't that bad. And, you know, Tavia Butler say, you know, I didn't create your problems, or whatnot, you know, I just let the problems that we already know exists. I looked at them 30 years later. And I told the story of the way they turned into full fledged disasters. And then the student answer, what do we do? What's the answer? Then? She said, there is no answer. There are multitude of answers. And you can become one, if you so choose. And I think and I think that that story is instructive for us is that oftentimes as the the the Catholic theologian, hammer now when we say that we always are in danger of looking for the final solution. And as a writer, I just don't, you know, what do the church do with that? I don't know. You know, I know what I'm trying to do with that I'm trying to, I'm trying to write better, I'm trying to allow that, to help me have a more whole and healthy theology. I'm trying to allow that and help me become a better neighbor, a better Christian, a better human being. I wanted to help me tell better stories. When I think about the story of Jesus, Jesus offered a certain type of touching, and being put back together again, giving the challenges of the world that he lived in. So how do I write about the challenges? How do I write about the things that are problems that's turning into disasters? That's, I guess that's a part of the equation that's a part of the solution. That's a part of becoming an answer is me being willing to tell the story of us and willing to tell the story of myself and implicate myself in ways that are honest, you know, but not not narcissistic? You know, I feel like there's a way to tell story where, like, you know, like, it's almost like, it's like what Imani were right in brief, where she, she talked about, you know, people like, like, like black, like black people dying is commodification. His social and culture. You know, think about George Floyd in 2020. Where many people take that moment, and it becomes social fun and financial and cultural capital. Yeah. Okay, let's, let's put out banners. And now we're going to get money for that and things like that. That's marketing and things like that, you know, people treat our bodies and our lives as they're simply just reducible to what white people think about us. And I just don't think that is the case. So I think, what should the church do with that? I don't know. I know what I'm doing with that. I know what Jesus did with that. And I know that when you're talking about the church doing what seems to be writing more rule, you know, is a tall task to ask for, you know, at every point in history, we would say that the church has been critical, you know, for for, for transformation. But, but also the church has been integral to these these aspects of terror. There is no, there is no, you know, slavery, and a history of subject racial subjugation, without the theological justification of believing that black people are chattel, your property, you know, there is no, in some sense, you know, wealth gap, or in costs or incarceration rate without these ideas of politics and punishment and morality, much rooted in these kind of ideas of divine nature, there is nobody shooting somebody and beating somebody up that's trans and gay, without the religious idea of what whose body is worthy of love, and whose body is worthy of death and condemnation. You know, there's always this religious theological justification. And so the church, we must be honest about that. And we must be allow other people to see our stories, and allow other people to tell our stories for us, and try as best we can, you know, to tell some type of better stories, and become an answer to the problems many times that we created and protected and gave and gave justification for and so as I think about black people, our bodies our flesh, you know, I want to say yes, racism, white supremacy ratio to racial subjugation, and the likes white social dominance, white political dominance, that inequalities in power dynamics, all of it is terrible, but our black lives, our humanity, is our gift, not our burden. Yeah. And I want to be very clear about that. You know, when, when I think about the cross and lynchin truth, I just don't think about death. I don't think about us dying. I think about us being alive. June, Jordan, the Pope would say, This is my gospel, I am black alive and looking back at you. And if that, if that ain't the good news. I don't know what is just like Jesus, on the third day, I am alive, looking back at you. And I truly believe that the glory of God, you know, as black people alive and in love, and getting better in this country also getting better as well. So

Seth Price 43:15

yeah, so last question. When you try to wrap words around, explaining God, what do you say to that? When I'm like, Hey, Dante, I need it. Like, what's like, who? What is why? Where whatever? What words do you give to

Danté Stewart 43:29

that? I tell people to read The Color Purple, the Alice Walker,

Seth Price 43:36

walk away, and walk away,

Danté Stewart 43:38

read the god forbid, by Alice Walker, and I and then and then we're talking about God, or whatnot. But now, you know, I don't have many conversations like that, you know, in some sense, I just a part of me believes those conversations are futile. or whatnot, in a sense, you and I know we were wrapped up in spaces that it seemed my deck conversation exhausted. And I don't even think that God wants us to think about God is not concerned about whether we can give a teleological argument a cosmological argument for the existence of divine epistemology and our experience, in our experience, experience existential reality of anxiety is to say, I don't know if God wants us to use those cyber words in some sense, or whatnot. So, you know, I in my own life, you know, no lie, man, as I as I think about where I'm trying to think and find God. You know, right now, I do believe the glory of God as I think Iranians say, this is human beings alive. And I try and spot God. You know, when Jesus I try and spot God particularly in our lives, you know, when Jesus, you know, saying the kingdom of God is like, what's interesting about that those stories was is always something that we already knew on Earth. The kingdom of God is like Yeah, some we already know on Earth, and they use metaphors. And so for me, I'm trying to think about, okay, the kingdom of God is like reading, beloved, by Toni Morrison, sitting by yourself in your office, saying this year that your flesh love it. That for that is surprised the kingdom of God is like reading James Baldwin, letter from a region of my mind where he talks about that we thought, you know, I thought being a guy was about loving everybody, but oftentimes that stopped when you entered the church, isn't it the church door? You know, the kingdom of God is like reading. Toni Cade Bambara was two solid eaters. And Velma asking Velleman get next question. Are you sure you want to be well, sweetheart, because healing and wholeness is no trifling matter. The kingdom of God is like that, like somebody out on the streets, dancing, like Jada is rotting in front of the policeman during 2020. Protests in response to the murdering of George Floyd, the kingdom of God is like, people realizing that Breanna Taylor, and Tatiana Jefferson and many of the black women who are abused sexually, physically, emotionally, psychologically, must be heard and seen that is for me, you know, I want to find God I want to find you know, when Jesus asked that question, you know, Will, Will there'll be faith on earth when I come back finding faith on earth? You know, I don't, you know, I think I think in some sense, those narratives are connected, that, you know, whenever Jesus said, The kingdom of God has like, he always pointed to something we already knew on Earth. And I think, as Jesus said, that's why I want to find faith on Earth. And that's why I'm finding it right now and the sacredness of our black humanity, black stories, and the divine revelation that we can get from each Where do you

Seth Price 46:47

want people to go Dante they listen to this and again, I'm gonna link to the book because they should read the book because we we touched on like seven topics of 800 Topic book. So where do you want people to go you know, to follow you to interact by the book to do something else like what what should people do if they if they feel so let? Yeah,

Danté Stewart 47:09

I think I think I usually recommend books to people tell them to read um, I think everybody should read the Yellow House by Sarah Brown. It is probably one of the most beautifully black books that I have read in recent days. The Yellow House by Sarah Boone men we reaped BY JASMINE Ward, heavy by KSA lay men the Secret Lives of church ladies by dish Ophelia the prophets by Robert Jones you know, look bow waves by Jason Reynolds. I mean, just just just the gamut of black literature. You know, read it all know try and try and read to see we became by Enki James and the black interior by by Elizabeth Alexander. It no stop there going pick up a little devil in America by me for dual key. No, stop there. Go and look at black book by Matteo and I'm bound by Tirana and somebody's daughter by Ashley Ford. And and, and don't just stop there. Don't go go and read Donaire Moore's no ashes in the fire. And the ones who don't say they love you by Maurice ruff. And all these black stories where you don't ingest, digest them, sit with them. Read the classics. In Black live Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, Nikki Giovanni Tony K. Nella Larsen. Jean Toomer read the classics, go back, and sit with that. And I think in some sense, there will be revelation of what I believe is the world that God desires, and what what God desires of our faith lives, particularly a certain type of honesty, certain type of love, certain type of vulnerability, a certain type of dreaming, what can be possible for us. And so if you want to keep up with me, just go to Twitter or Instagram, and my handles all the same is at Stuart Dante see all of them the same? I try and get back to everybody that I possibly can. But you know, life is picking up. Busy two kids. I got two kids, I'm in school and Mary, I'm in ministry. Yeah, I'm writing a lot. You know, I got my own personal life and working out and things like that. So I try and hit everybody back, but I'm giving you if I fail,

Seth Price 49:40

does your wife do what I do and say, Hey, I'm I need you to start saying no to a few things. You just keep saying Sure. Let's do it. Yeah,

Danté Stewart 49:46

definitely. Definitely. She is definitely the one that tells and she is. He's the one who knows like, Nah, you doing too much?

Seth Price 49:53

Yeah, I told him I do this. We're not gonna do that. I'm like, I'm gonna text him and say we're not gonna do that. We're not That's not me. I don't know what you're doing that night. But you're not doing that. Yeah. Yeah, man. Well don't say I really appreciate your time. And yeah, very much and thank you again for your words they are as powerful book, I am going to finish it. I had another issue with another book similar not to yours. But um, I read a book by called. Without Buddha, I could not be Christian by Paul Knitter. And I struggled with that book as well. I finished it a year later, I finally finished it. So yeah, I don't know. Maybe it's the way I read. I don't know. Anyhow, thank you so much for your time today, man, I really appreciate it.

Danté Stewart 50:40

No doubt, brother, you be blessed. You too.

Seth Price 50:47

Now, I haven't added it up. But there are hundreds of 1000s, if not millions of podcasts on the internet. And I am humbled that you continue to download this one. This is your first time here. Please know that there are transcripts of these shows. Not always in real time, but I do my best. And if you go back in the logs, you can find transcripts for pretty much any episode that you'd like. The show is recorded and edited by me, but it is produced by the patrons supporters of the show. That is one of the best if not the best way that you can support the show. If you get anything at all out of these episodes, if you think on them, or if you you know you're out and about and you tell your friends about it or Hey, mom, dad, brother, sister, friend, boss, Pastor, here's what I heard. What are your thoughts on that? If this is helping you in any way and it is helping me consider supporting the show in that manner. It is extremely inexpensive, but collectively, it is so very much helpful for you. I pray that you are blessed. And you know that you're cherished and beloved. And we'll talk soon

Moving from Non-Being into Being with Nathan Jacobs / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Nathan Jacobs 0:00

So what the incarnation is, is not, hey, we need to sacrifice in order to remedy this whole judicial problem that we've got in the future. Christianity is about our corrupted species: the creator, the Son of God, the logos, right, the agent of creation, interest our species, in order to heal it and repair it and make it incorruptible from the inside. So that, that lifeline back to God is, you know, sort of reconnected and that we through union with Him and the sort of sacramental life of repentance and so on, immitation of him can somehow partake of His incorruption. And basically, he repaid putting off our corruption for incorruption.

Seth Price 0:53

What's going on everybody. Welcome back to the show. I'm Seth. This is the can I say this at church podcast? Thank you for downloading the show today. Whether or not that was you intentionally doing it or your phone just randomly playing the next thing that it thought you would want to hear? I'm glad that it chose this. I'm glad that you did, too.

Anyway, all jokes aside, I really want to get into this one quickly because it's slightly longer than normal. And that's fine. So I brought back guest Nathan Jacobs, who was on a while back, we had a very deep conversation on that one as well. Funny story, and I think you'll hear me reference it in the show, maybe not it might be in the patron only version. I can't remember now. I ran out of memory space (the) last time I spoke to Nathan like legitimately could not record anything else. And I think we shaved it off like 45 seconds away from…I don't know what happens if you actually max out a memory card. I don't know if it corrupts. I don't know what it does. Anyhow, wasn't the case this time I came in with time to spare. So with that being said, we're going to talk a bit about begotten like what is that? What does it mean to have begotten(ness) and what does that mean for our faith for Jesus for the cosmos for you and I it is a fascinating conversation. Now we do jump off a few rabbit trails and I mean, what kind of a conversation does it so here we go, roll the tape.

Scholar and resident of philosophy and religion in the religion now….Gosh, see…scholar in residence of philosophy and religion in the religion in the arts in contemporary culture program at Vanderbilt University Divinity School, Nathan Jacobs.

Nathan Jacobs 2:56

Yeah, you did it. It is a mouthful.

Seth Price 2:59

How are you? That feels like it feels like after religion in the arts, it doesn't feel like that should be in that sentence. But I'm, I don't know English. So doesn't matter.

Nathan Jacobs 3:10

I'm doing all right. I'm doing all right. Not bad. How are you? It's been a while.

Seth Price 3:14

It has been, I don't know, year and a half, maybe longer, maybe less? I don't know. Time is, um, time shifts with little league seasons. So it's just one little league season to the next. So I'm good. I'm good, man. Um, I'm glad you reached back out. You are among a handful of people that I'm like, “That was a fun conversation”. And literally, I still tell that. So I don't think I've ever said this on the show. For those listening in our first episode, which I'll link somewhere in the transcripts. I do that now. I transcribe the episodes because I need other things to keep me busy. Yeah, I ran out of memory in the middle of our conversation. So literally at the end is like some I have five minutes left. You have five minutes. It's a hard stop. And then it's it will stop you. I don't know if it corrupts the file. I don't actually know what happens. I just know it stops. So I came a little better prepared today. But yeah, so you had reached out and before we get there, so what is new? It's been a couple years. What is new, what should people know?

Nathan Jacobs 4:19

Well, I mean, there's a lot new. Let's see I've I'm no longer University Kentucky as the title you read indicates I moved from Kentucky to Tennessee (in the) Nashville area, now affiliated with Vanderbilt as opposed to UK. But a big part of the move was because of my ongoing work in film. So I don't know how much I can disclose about the projects I'm working on. But suffice to say, it sounds like the next project, much bigger project than any of my previous ones, has now been green-lit or will be this week. As well as what looks like could be how do I say this…in a cryptic way, an opportunity to keep on doing more film projects. well beyond that. So anyway, I'll just say that things are heating up in terms of the film side of things. And then I mean, in terms of academics and all that I continue to write and speak and publish, but film has been a sort of primary focus. And, and then, you know, my Substack I suppose I should plug that to right? So I started a Substack, which, for me was a little odd because so I mentioned to you this one friend of mine, Grant, who we have some sort of mutual connection with. He a Lutheran pastor. We met initially because he reached out to me because he wanted to learn Patristics. So he was a student of mine. And then, and then anyway, we developed a friendship over time. And he realized, whoa! You tend to write these emails to people in answer to questions that are really, really long, and really theologically rich, you should publish those! Which to me, if you look at my publications, they're all academic journals, like Cambridge and things like that. And it's like, well, what journal would publish in any of these? And he’s like, “no, there's this thing called the internet, you can publish things for whatever you want”. And I was like really? Is that called publishing? I didn't know that. That's weird.

So anyway, so that's where the Substack thing emerging. So basically, it's exactly what it says it's theological letters that I've written over the years to people. And there's probably like, 70 plus such letters that I'm just slowly rolling out. And so anyway, yeah, so that's, that's…NathanAJacobs.substack.com. Yeah, is the address.

Seth Price 6:49

That's fun. And you've enjoyed doing it so far.

Nathan Jacobs 6:53

Yeah, I mean, in many ways, I find these letters, they're, they're enjoyable for me to write. Because to do the sort of high level academic publishing that I typically do, it's, you know, I enjoy that too. But it's a it's a lot more laborious to work through and create sort of citation and quotation apparatus and things like that. Whereas when people just ask you theological questions and say, “Oh, let me give you an answer” and some of that falls away. There's, I don't know, there's, I find it a lot. I have I find it rather fulfilling to just sit there and just share a theological answer without the pressure of all the academic apparatus.

And so to actually put that out there and say, “Oh, well, maybe there are some other people who would want to read these other than just the one person I wrote them for”. I guess we'll see.

Seth Price 7:41

I guess we'll see. Yeah, I can relate to that. That was the whole reason I started the show. I had questions. And then other people were like, “You should put that on the internet”. And it's like, why this these are my questions. And then it's, and then other people are like, yeah, but that's, I have that question.

So yeah, so I'm gonna I'm gonna guess a venture of what your video is. And this was, again, I didn't really know what your answer was going to be. So I'm guessing that you're making a newer version of The Chosen little, Jesus, TV style. But more for the Eastern, you know, after after Nicea, that region. So it's just going to be those couple 100 years there? That feels right. Why not? Right?!

Nathan Jacobs 8:20

Why not!

No, I mean, I can see why you went there. So it's just…I’ll say this…it's a horror movie. So I'll just say that.

Seth Price 8:28

Um, well, I mean, depending on your denomination, also could still fit. (laughs from both) Also could still.

Nathan Jacobs 8:36

I suppose that's fair. I suppose that's fair.

Seth Price 8:42

All right. I'm horrible. I'm gonna burn. I'm horrible. All right. So I do want to get down to business mostly because I know you have a hard stop, and my son will come home around the same time, and then the dogs will get crazy. And, you know, life will take back over.

So you had sent me your substack. And then for those listening, so Nathan yours is the only the second sub sect that I subscribed to. It's not something that I search out. But it is something that I'm like, when I get in there. And I find one I'm like, I like this because there's almost something where I find that authors or people that are expressing their thoughts tend to write in a little bit different way when they know that there's people paying for the content. Maybe you're less guarded, maybe you're not? I don't know, in there, though…what were you going to say?

Nathan Jacobs 9:22

No, no, no, no. No, I do. I do. Well, you know, no, I do hope…I tried to make sure that the content is worth paying for. I'll just say that. Yeah, in terms of the point that people write differently if they know.

Seth Price 9:36

Yeah, well, I mean, for context for those that have never subscribed to substack. Like you will spend more on a burnt Starbucks coffee with caramel every week. Um, yeah. So I mean, why are we…why are you playing games? Just do it. Anyway, same thing could be said for Patreon, though, usually plug that at the end, but why not? Okay, so there's like a four part series. He's here. And I'm not even really sure I'm saying some of the words right? That will that will be my Protestant ignorance, right? So you got a “Begotten Not Made? Is the Nicene Distinction Cogent? and even the word cogent may need some definition I had to Google, it's fine.

But there's like a seven part premise here. And I'll just kind of in a nutshell, give that premise and then we can go wherever we need to go. And I'll ask the next dumb question, which will honestly be 100% truthful because that's about where I'm at. So as I've read through some of this, so you basically build on the Eunomiam you know, I don't even know if I'm saying that, right, that argue the following:

  • That all that which is begotten is caused

  • The Son is begotten of the Father

  • Therefore, the Son is caused

  • All that which exists is in itself is not caused

  • Therefore, the Son that is not that which exists

  • All that which bears the divine essence is that which exists (a se) I'm not sure what that means.

  • And then therefore, the Son is not that which bears the divine essence.

Which I have…I don't…I told somebody what we were talking about. And they were like, Yeah, that's fascinating. Tell me more. I tried to tell them a little more. And they said, interesting. Oddly enough, one of them gave this same…well, what about the angels? Which I think is in like the second version of this, like, well, I was like, funny you say that? I just read that yesterday. So where should we begin for someone like myself that grew up in a western church that is spoon fed 20 minute homilies every Sunday, and then we don't think about religion outside of that or theology? Where should we begin with even trying to tackle the topic of sure “begottenness”?

Nathan Jacobs 11:45

Yeah. So I think one of the things I mean, out of curiosity, can I ask what denomination church you go to is so sure. I currently go to a cooperative Baptist Church, which where I'm at in Virginia, it basically just means Yeah, we have women in ministry, and our views on homosexuality our own stay out of our business. I don't want your missing money SBC. And so don't tell me what to do. Yeah, but I've also gone to nondenominational. I've been to Lutheran churches, I've I've attended Presbyterian churches, Pentecostalism usually scares me. You know, because why not? We're not supposed to raise your hands in church, there's no raising of hands. SoNathan Jacobs 12:25

Well, the reason I asked was because I was curious whether or not your church says the Nicene Creed, right, because the Nicene Creed is, you know, one of the only, you know sort of commonalities you have sort of crudely speaking between the Eastern Orthodox and the Roman Catholics and then carried over into the Protestant traditions right so Lutheran still say it if you know least traditional Lutherans like Missouri Synod, one's more conservative Lutheran stead, you know, the reformed set, Anglican said and so on. So, so in the Nicene Creed, this sort of broadly ecumenical statement, one of the only Creed's the only creed, that is said, in both east and west churches, there's this statement that, you know, the sudden that, that the Son of God is begotten, not made, right. And I think plenty of being of the same essence as or being oneness with the Father. And, and I think one of the things that happens is a lot of people hear that right, or they read, you know, that God's only begotten Son and John 316. And, and they're just like, I don't know what that word means, but okay. And they just kind of shrug Him and accept it. And not thinking about this sort of conundrum that really emerges. Which is that begotten, that's the same language used in like, all the genealogies Abraham begat Isaac. Yeah. Right. And so the fact of the matter is, it's, it's a causal word, like it indicates that the father cause the sun to exist, which, you know, for some people, they go, Well, I guess that must be talking about his humanity or something, and they just sort of shrug and move on, not realizing that the way the term was understood historically in the church, as well as you know, in in certain other, you know, letters like Hebrews, it's pretty clearly an indication of the sun being caused, as God right like, His divine nature him as divine is caused before he ever is incarnate. So he's the only begotten with reference to his divinity. And that raises some interesting questions like I thought God couldn't be caused, right. And that's really the syllogism that you read, which I'm guessing, you know, was probably hard for most people to follow but if they go to the sub sect, they can actually see it, like, laid out. It's it's an analytic breakdown of the you know, Mian, objection and the you know, means we're seminarians which I'll say what that is, but then I do another version of that in part four, where I restate in a different way, but the point was that people like areas areas of Alexandria one of the big heretics, right of the early church, the the area in dispute was the one that was so divisive that it required the first Ecumenical Council, right, this council with representatives from the entire church to sort of look at this and say, well, areas is teaching one thing Athanasius, his opponent is teaching another, you know, which one is the faith that we received? Basically, areas, his position was pretty common sense. You know, he just said, Look, he's begotten. Whenever you cause something, there's like a time before you cause it, and then you cause it, and then there it is, right. So there must be a time when the Son of God didn't exist. When God was not a father, he's just God. He's not God, the Father is just God. Then he decided he wanted a son. So he began them. And and then he came into being, and you know, and there is, and this is what sparked the controversy, because people like Athanasius, recognize, wait a second, if there's a time he was not and then it came into being, then you're actually you're not saying he's God, you're saying he's a creature? He's actually created. He's made and an areas was kind of like, well, yeah, I guess he is. He's the greatest of all the creatures, right? Most godlike of all the creatures. And what was interesting is while a lot of people recognize, okay, I'm pretty sure that's not like Orthodox Christian, there being little Orthodox, Orthodox Christian thinking to say that the Son of God is a creature, I'm pretty sure we're supposed to say that he's God. But they kind of stopped there. And they don't realize that the Orthodox position contrary areas was no he's begotten, not made. And so you get into this weird thing where they're saying, no, he's caused, but not the way areas is suggesting he's caused. And so they're still saying, no, he's caused, but he's not created. And that's what if you pause for a minute you go, Well, how does that work? Yeah, that's a little weird.

Seth Price 17:02

I've done math. That's not how math works. One plus two is three. Yeah.

Nathan Jacobs 17:07

So So anyway, this whole response was initially and with each of these letters on substack, I, I always opened by giving the context right who wrote to me my although a veil their identity, who wrote to me why what occasion and this was actually, this was a scholarly friend of mine, right? A friend who we did our PhDs together. And so he was like, okay, look, man, I know, I'm not supposed to say this, but just between you and me. I'm not sure I, I buy into the begat not made. Like, I'm not sure it's coherent philosophically. And it wasn't the first time I'd heard that I'd mentioned when you brought up the angels thing, there's a article, O'Brien left out his philosophy out at Oxford. And he gives this whole thought experiment to try to explain why he just thinks it's incoherent. Right? It's it's not a cogent not a coherent position to say that, you know, he's forgotten not made that you're still just saying he's a creature. Yeah. And so he opposes he opposes the distinction. And so basically, my my friend was asking me for help, is kind of saying, Okay, I know that you buy into this, and I trust you, I trust that your sharp guy helped me out understand how on earth, this is a coherent distinction. And so I was like, Okay, sure. And I started to write a letter, which then turned into a journal article, which is now published in religious studies. And so, rather than actually sending him a proper letter, I just sent him a journal article. Like,

Seth Price 18:41

I wrote it, and I'm not doing it twice.

Nathan Jacobs 18:43

Right, but substack I still tried to strip out some of the apparatus and make it a little more letter like and but I had to break it into four parts, because it was just too long for substack

Seth Price 18:53

Did you know that there was a word limit before you begin? I didn't. Oh, no. You hit Ctrl C Ctrl. V? Dang it. Yeah. He's

Nathan Jacobs 19:02

like, no, no, this is way too long. It's like how long do I have to keep?

Seth Price 19:08

Because then you have to reframe everything fine. How many times do I have to do this? Yeah, that's right. Yes. Right. Yeah. So So I have a question that I thought about as I was driving home okay, so I think that often people and this may be a dumb question and if it is, tell me if it if it is, so be gotten for me, okay, here we go. So if things are created, right for Earth, and so that's what I want to focus on. How could they could could there be a be gotten this before the creation of Earth because the universe doesn't say that every you know what I mean? Maybe I'm not asking this correctly. I don't. I don't think I am actually. Yeah, give it another shot. I am struggling. As I'm saying it out loud. I realized how ridiculous it sounds. And this is the downside of not being able to edit the video, because everyone will see how ridiculous I am. Okay, so be godness. And creation only seems to matter for the salvation of people on earth because Earth is the central focus point. Correct? Like we're talking about the divinity of Jesus, correct?

Nathan Jacobs 20:12

Well, if you're asking me from the eastern patristic stance, which is what I'm doing, not correct, but keep on going.

Seth Price 20:18

So my question would be, then, what could there be a be gotten this before the Earth's Earth's relation to be gotten even matters?

Nathan Jacobs 20:29

If I let me try to rephrase what I think you're you're trying to get at? Yeah, right. Is it? Is it really that you're sort of suggesting that? Well, let's say that Arius is sort of right, you know, maybe maybe we ditch the word created, but we still say begotten and still causal. And we sort of do this, like, here's the line where all the creatures creatures are, and then back here, you know, over here on this behind this line, there's this other causal moment that we called the godness. Is it something like that?

Seth Price 21:03

No. Okay, let me try to make it so. Okay. So there's, there's life on Polaris, and we realize crap, we need a corporeal form of the Divine to come in and make things right and so I begotten then and now I come down to earth, and I'm going to redo creation. And we've got our own narrative of that in the Bible. The begotten already happened.

Nathan Jacobs 21:28

Oh, see? Now here it sounds like though you're you're associating the goddness with the taking on of the Boreal. Is that right? Yeah, maybe that's wrong. That's yeah, so that's the part that's not not right. Okay. So um, so, you know, so begotten this actually refers to let's pretend there, let's do it this way. Let's pretend there is no incarnation ever, right? There's just the Holy Trinity. begotten, as well as spy ration like or proceeding, right, the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. Or if you're in the West, father and son, those are both causal terms. And so within their Trinitarian theology in the eastern fathers, which is what I'm focused on here, is the father is uncaused. Nobody causes him, but he causes the Son and the Spirit to exist and to have His divine nature. That's what the claim is. And so even if there were no sort of redemption history, in the sense of the Son of God becoming incarnate, the son would still be begotten. Okay, and his divinity, that's the claim, okay. And that's where areas is trying to get his head around, how is he not then a creature? Does he have to be a creature? And so a lot of what I'm trying to do is break down and that's the same thing my friend was asking and same thing Brian left out was, you know, arguing in his article, what I'm trying to show is that there's pretty significant and philosophically robust. You know, Kate nut arguments being made here for how that distinction does make sense. So

Seth Price 23:06

yeah, okay. Should

Nathan Jacobs 23:08

we talk about

Seth Price 23:09

this? Yeah, yeah, we, we should. Yeah. But we

Nathan Jacobs 23:13

want to make sure we're set up the the problem, right. I mean, do you feel like you understand what, what the problem is? Well, yes,

Seth Price 23:17

it was more of me playing devil's advocate of okay, well, the universe is, however, all the universes and God exists at a faster speed than the speed of light. And so what does be gotten mean? I had near Neil deGrasse Tyson, in the back of my head saying, you know, that, if we look at 1000 years from now, we won't even know the light? And what would that eliminated when we look out over it? Because that portion of space is already outside of our observable understanding, which is our understanding. So that's the reason I was just ruminating on things. So I don't know. Anyway, may have derailed everything, probably not. Let me try to refocus. So there is a part on the second part of what you've written, that you say the difficulty is that objects consist of more than just form there is, for example, an enduring subject that sits beneath these forms hypostasis, as well as the substrate substratum of matter in which forms come to be, and then you go on to talk about something called epoch noia, which I'm also not good with. And then you use hyper osios. I'm not saying that right, either. What is all those? What does that have to do with anything but itself? Okay, so let's, let's try to let's try to make this a little more. Sort of, like, intelligible. So

Nathan Jacobs 24:36

let me let me do it.

Seth Price 24:40

I told you I was coming from a place of ignorance.

Nathan Jacobs 24:42

Well, that's that's fine. So let's do it this way. Right. So I think one of the there's there's several differences between making and getting, right and that's really what all of this is about is trying to say, okay, when you say we got not made, what are the differences right? Is it just like that big garden happened a long time ago? Is that you know, what sort of what sort of verbal voodoo are you doing when you make this sort of distinction. And my whole point is that there's pretty substantive distinction. So I think the the main place where I would sort of begin to boil it down, would be and this gets to some of the things that you were just citing in there the substratum of matter and formal properties and the hypothesis and things like that. So within the area and dispute since that's, that's where this really comes to fall to the fore. There are certain arguments being leveled by Athanasius, that I find this these were actually Incidentally, the first, the first aspects of patristic thought that clued me into everything that I talked about in this article Athanasius, he talks about, you know, that the things are created out of nothing. And this is pretty standard, most people like know that, that the pagans thought that there's a Demiurge in the Demiurge sculpt set a pre existing matter, it's already there, and you just sort of shapes it. Whereas the Christians think that God makes not just the stuff, but you know, this stuff out of which the stuff is made, right like that it's created out of nothing, it doesn't use pre existing material. But Athanasius uses then this other technical distinction, that I think a lot of people would miss if they were reading Athanasius. But so jumped out to me, which that Athanasia says that things move from non being into being right. And he talks about the natural state of a thing being not being and can retreat to non being. So part of the background here is actually a problem in ancient philosophy precedes the Christians of generation. Okay, so you and I accept just as a given that things come into being right, like there are plants that sort of move into existence, and then deteriorate and go out of existence. There's animals that move into existence and go out of existence, right? Like, this is just common sense. We look around, we see it all the time. And we take that for granted no big deal. But in ancient philosophy, specifically the eleatic school, they looked at that they're like, I don't think that makes any sense whatsoever that that happens. And here's why. Right? So I'll try to articulate the problem.

The problem is there like, Okay, so let's say that, let's pick an example here. Let's pretend that that this pen moves into existence, right? This is the thing that is generated, right? It comes to be. And so we're gonna say that this pen moves into being there like, well, here's the problem things either are, or they're not, right, they either there's no such thing as like, it's sort of exists, they exist, or they don't exist. And their point is, if it doesn't exist, then it first of all, isn't in it at all. Second of all, it can't do anything, including move into existence. So you're kind of talking nonsense. But if you jump to the other side, and you say, well, it already exists before it exists. Well, then why does it need to move into existence in the first place? It already exists? Yeah. So their Point is like, there's no coherent way of even formulating talk of generation, I understand that we all look around and we say it's happening. But they're like, it doesn't make any sense. And so there were several solutions to this. But you know, Aristotle solution was that what he suggested is there actually is a middle between existence and nothingness. And he suggested that's potentiality. So you have the potential to be stronger than you are right, you could go and do some weightlifting and usher that sort of potential into actuality. That potential is not nothing. It is something right. But it's less than concrete, actual strength. And so Aristotle suggests that actually is an ontological, middle, right? Middle between nothing and something. And according to Aristotle, that's what makes possible generation and corruption, things aren't moving from nothing to something, they're moving from potentially something to actually something potential to actual. Like conceptually, I always like using the idea of a fabric right a shapeless bit of fabric, where it's like, well, it's potentially spherical is potentially cubicle, you know, move around, potentially in a number of shapes. And that potential becomes concretely real. If I wrap it around a ball right now. It's now it's potential to be spherical is actual right? It's actually spherical. And so what Aristotle talked about, as he talked about the distinction between form and matter, that potential right that potential to be something that's what Aristotle thought matter really is what does matter. It's really just the potential to be stuff And then what happens is when it manifests concrete properties, spirituality, for example, these drawing on, you know, his teacher Plato's terms, these are forms right formal properties. So we identify them with abstract nouns right? Sphere, right, we can talk about this sort of abstract nature of sphere. And spirituality manifests in the matter. And that's where that potential to be spherical moves from potential to concretely real. And what we call corruption or degeneration, right is just where that then retreats from matter. And it just goes back to potential. So that's the basic concept that Aristotle used in order to solve that problem. Well, one of the other terms that Aristotle used for potential was non being. And the reason to use non being is because it's softer than nothing, right? It's just not quite being right. You know, it's not being relative to things that are being right. And so when Athanasius says that, if areas His Son of God is created, right, he says, Then he moved from non Bing to being he moved from a potential Bing to an actual Bing. Now, you might say, okay, so what? Let's just pretend that's true, right? Let's just pretend areas, right. And that's true. So what? Well, this is what gets you to a critical distinction in an Athanasius. Athanasius suggests that, that right there is the dividing line between God and creatures. You want to know what makes a creature a creature and not God, we come into be.

And that's why we're susceptible to mutation. Because that first movement is a mutation, we transition from something we weren't to something we are. That's why we're susceptible to corruption, deterioration, retreating, from what we are back to, you know, relative non being, yeah. And it goes through all these sort of entailments that he says, that's just what creatures are. And so in Athanasius, as mine, what he suggests is there's this dividing line between God and creatures. And on the one side, are all the things that come into being angels, humans, and if areas His Son of God came into being than areas, His Son of God, and on the other side is God, who fully is what he is, you know, and doesn't transition into being or doesn't become something he wasn't, or so on and so forth. Now, there's significant, you know, there's significant points for his understanding of the Christian gospel and things like that, that I'd be happy to talk about. But I'd say the first starting point for really getting our heads around what's going on in this discussion is exactly that. That Athanasius. And then, as I point out in, in other publications and things like that other other use of stern fathers with them, they really see they're the gulf between God and creatures to be that, right? That creatures are things that come into being and then from coming, the fact that that we come into being unfolds all these other metaphysical entailments, like that were mutable, changeable, like that were corruptible, like that were insensitive, some sense temporal, because there's a before and after to our existence that were finite and circumscribe bubble because our existence wasn't infinite, it had a certain definite starting point, so on So where there's a host of that were material, including angels, right? Yeah. All of these things start to naturally unfold from that. And that's where Athanasius sort of freaks out, because he's like, areas what you're proposing when you say that there was not a time that he existed and then he came into being, you have now definitively placed him on this side of the god creature divide. And he's really ontologically speaking no different than the rest of us. And Athanasius thinks that's why areas Christ can't save any of the creatures. Because we need something that's not a creature to save us.

Seth Price 34:17

It's that time of the episode, give me 30 seconds or so I'll be right back.

Thinking on being a non being, there's no value in being either than in that mindset, like the value I guess, would be the consciousness awareness that you are being

Nathan Jacobs 34:41

so so in terms of like, the value of things, right. The idea is that, that when you talk about something being good or bad or greater or lesser or something like that, there's certain targets, right? So think about it. Think about it this way. There's only one way one correct way to draw a circle, right? To draw a perfect circle, there's one way to do it all the points have to be an equal distance from a common century, you know, then that flowing circumference, there are an infinite number of ways to miss draw circle. And and, and the reason that's significant is because if change is arbitrary, then there is no better or worse change, right? It's just change. But if it's progress, if it's moving toward, there has to be a target, right, that you're getting closer toward. And so in this sense, what they would suggest is that non being or non being is an evil, right? The potentiality of matter isn't evil. In fact, Gregory of Nyssa says, it's good. And so far as if you're a corrupt person who needs to repent, you know, that potential to be other than you are is the very thing that makes it possible for you to repent and become good, you know, so you should be thankful for it. Yeah. Right. So, you know, non being in itself isn't, you know, good or evil, it just sort of is it's this sort of a ontological potential to be things. What makes something a movement, good or evil is how, whether it's moving toward its target, right. So in human nature, right, whatever the proper formation of human nature is, the closer we move toward that if the movement is toward that trajectory, it is a good movement, if it's a retreat or divergence away from it, it's a corrupt movement. Same is true with, you know, plants or with animals or whatever. So the term is good, or, you know, generation corruption, well formed, malformed, normal, abnormal, all of these terms indicates some sort of Terminus toward which you're driving. And, and basically, the idea is that movements are deemed to be good or bad relative to that, that Terminus.

Seth Price 36:52

Yeah. So not that. Not that I necessarily believe this. But it's the question that sprang to mind, what do I care about whether or not the sun is a begotten creature for a specific purpose? If the purpose is the same thing anyway? Like, like, I create an arrow to shoot a target, what do I care? The point was to shoot the target or the point was for sanctification or salvation or Theosis, or whatever word you want to wrap around that? Why does it matter?

Nathan Jacobs 37:21

Okay, so to answer this question, I have to tell you how wildly different the Eastern patristic concept of Christianity is from probably Christianity as you think of it. Okay. So, let's, let's go back to this one point that I just mentioned about the fact that, you know, every creature of metaphysical necessity, is mutable, right? Because like this, what Athanasios says explicitly, and then Alexandria of Alexandria says, the

Seth Price 37:49

environment I see is a mutable you mean changeable, right. changeable, okay.

Nathan Jacobs 37:52

So the term the Greek term is Alios. Right? And it just means to become something you weren't. Right. So, right. So in this case, you're potentially a human and now you're actually a human. Right? That's, that's a change, right? I did it. I did it. So an Aristotle in his physics says this explicitly, that the first moment of things existence begins with a mutation, right, a transition into being right. And so since mutation or you know, Alioto, is what it indicates is this, you know, change in ontology, the shifting ontology, since what a creature is is something that moves from non being into being, that means that to be a creature is to be mutable. Right? That's, that's, there's no way of doing it otherwise. And in fact, Athanasius and the council's and all that they're really clear, they're like, not even God can make an immutable creature. Like, that's like talking about him making square circles, you know, or something like that. They're like, No, it's not even a coherent statement. Now, the reason that's important though, is because change right mutability entails the possibility of change for good, but it also entails the possibility of change for bad, right? The very potential to be otherwise is what underwrites the potential to improve or to degenerate. And so mutability, the flip side of that is that every creature is also a metaphysical, necessity corruptible. Okay, we can deteriorate, we can die. In the case of spiritual or moral beings, we can cling to God. And here, keep in mind, I don't want to go down a rabbit hole. But basically, for the Eastern fathers, they think of holiness, virtue, perfection, as uniquely divine traits. So when those are manifesting creatures, that's because the creature is somehow participating in the divine nature. So, so you become those things by clinging to God, or you retreat from God and you become spiritually and morally corrupt, right? Like that's kind of how that works, too. So every creature is corruptible. So let's do a thought. bearment Right in Christianity is probably it's pretty common to think of, well, what's the human condition that, you know, Christianity exists to remedy? And it's like, well, we sin. And there's this judge, and he's going to judge us at some point. And that's a problem because we broke the law, right? That's kind of how Western Christianity tends to think about it. But let's, let's put aside the whole sin thing for a minute. Let's just say that, you know, God makes the world nobody sins, right? So, so far, things are trucking along pretty good. Nobody's sinning. Nobody's violating the law. Here's the problem of metaphysical necessity. We're all susceptible to corruption, we can all screw the whole thing up at any moment, we can plumb it the whole cost,

Seth Price 40:43

no pressure, no pressure, right? No

Nathan Jacobs 40:45

pressure, just white knuckle it a little few more millennia. Right? No big deal. And, and in many ways, for the Eastern fathers, when they look at Christianity, they see the creature they see this not just as a human condition. That's why I'd said the whole thing that you'd set it as about salvation, being about humans isn't the way they think about it. Actually, it's, it's about the cosmos as a whole creatures, the creaturely condition is that we're all susceptible to corruption. And that's this threat, this time bomb looming over the head of all of creation, all the time, just because of what we are. It looms over the head of angels over humans, dogs, cats, you know, lions, tigers, and bears. And so like the and, and that is the thing that they think Christianity exists to remedy now, yes, corrupt ability, right, has manifested into actual corruption in our circumstance. But that's a manifestation of the problem. The problem was there before it ever happened. And so the big question that they have, the big question they have is, how do you ever escape it? And their answer is that the only way to escape corruption is to participate in or partake in the only nature that's incorruptible. And so they noticed throughout Scripture, how often Paul will talk about the resurrection from the dead being the putting off of corruption for in corruption, or Peter talking about the corruption that has come upon the world due to sin, and that we escaped that corruption by protecting the divine nature. And so in their mind what Christianity is there to offer the only lifeline the only hope the creatures have is to somehow participate in God participate in divinity, to partake of God's own incorruption immortality, untouchability, moral, spiritual interoperability, and become, you know, good, right, virtuous, etc. And that's the only hope of escaping that now. If we hold on to that for a minute, then what you realize is that the whole point of the incarnation of Christianity is to offer you that. So what the incarnation is, is not, hey, we need to sacrifice in order to remedy this whole judicial problem that we've got in the future. Christianity is about our corrupted species, the creator, the Son of God, the logos are the agent of creation, enters our species, in order to heal it and repair it and make it incorruptible from the inside. So that lifeline back to God is, you know, sort of reconnected and that we through union with Him, and the sort of sacramental life of repentance and so on, imitation of him can somehow partake of His in corruption and basically be remade, putting off our corruption for in corruption. Now, if you look at Christianity in those terms, all of a sudden areas, undoes the whole thing. Because if areas puts the Son of God on the creaturely side of that divide, and makes him a mutable, corruptible creature, he can't fix, he can't help any of the other creatures, he's in the same boat as us, even if you've never since. And so that shifts, you have to have that shift in how they see the Christian faith, how they see the creaturely condition, how they see what Christianity offers, in order to understand why Arianism was a big deal and why it was critical to say, no, no, no, he's not made. Because he's made he comes into being that he's mutable, corruptible, etc. He's begotten. And that's something different.

Seth Price 44:18

I'm curious, and you did not write about it. And maybe it's because it's irrelevant to the conversation. Where does so everyone talks about God the Father, and then there's the Son, and then the Spirit never gets spoken about. So where does is there? Is there a big gotten this mindset about spirit at all? Is there any, any Yeah, place at the table for that part of the conversation?

Nathan Jacobs 44:40

Yeah, it's not the godness. Right, because he's the only only begotten. Yeah, right. Yeah. But it's still causal, right. So the language of the Spirit proceeds from the Father, right? And then the whole dispute about proceeds from the Father and Son, that procession language or spy ration or outbreeding, language is another causal term and So all the same questions you'd raise about the Son of God, just as relevant to the Spirit. And I actually, I think, I don't know if I'd survived in the sort of letter version on substack. But in the in the published version, I actually have a footnote where I say, by the way, all of these arguments can just be applied to the Holy Spirit to it's just as relevant to that the same problems begin to emerge. And incidentally, this is, yeah, I mean, I don't want to go into the whole filio clay, but, but suffice it to say, this is a sorry, I said, filioque when most people probably don't know what that means. Okay.

Seth Price 45:31

What does it mean? Or more importantly, I, I'm not as concerned with what it means because you want to go into I am curious how you spell it, because I don't even know how to Google that for the transcripts.

Nathan Jacobs 45:40

Okay, F I L. Billy. I O

Seth Price 45:46

QU E? Yeah, there's no way there's no way I would have wrote that down. Correct. Is that

Nathan Jacobs 45:51

right? I think I spelled that, right. So it's, it's, it's really awesome, right? Which is son, okay. And then when you add Quaid to the end of a word in Latin, that's a add, right? So it's and the Son. And there's no, though, because Latin doesn't have definite articles. So filioque way, in the Nicene Creed, when it was first written the original version, it says, An in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and give her life who proceeds from the Father, and with the Father, and the son is worshipped and glorified. The Latin iteration Rome adds to it, the filioque way who proceeds from the Father and the Son. And this becomes doctrinally one of the big splits between the East and West, even though it's very clear that division is is far more than just that. But the point is, like, when, when you see for example, the only thing I was gonna say just about that is, for example, when Christ talks about sending the Holy Spirit. Yeah, yeah. Like, in the east, sending the Holy Spirit. You know, on his impossibles, you know, he's totally different than precession. Right? When you're talking about precession, you're talking about the causation, the eternal causation of the spirit by the father, just like you're talking about the eternal beginning, you know, of the sun, you know, you're not talking about the incarnation. Right. So in the same way with the spirit procession is speaking about the eternal causation of the Spirit, not the sending of the spirit at Pentecost.

Seth Price 47:14

Okay, so, okay. Um, yeah, I want to change gears as to other questions unrelated to the substack article in question, mostly, because I think I would need five or six hours to work through a 10th of my questions, of which there were many. But there are and I only say this, because I know that we have a stop coming. And so there are two questions that I've asked everyone. I don't believe I ever asked them. Have you? Maybe I did back in the day, I honestly don't remember. And I'm too lazy to find out. We don't remember either. I'm too lazy to find out. So I am curious on this, though, because I think church for you has a different definition than church over in western sub subset of proselytization. And the way that we do church on a Sunday, or whatever the day is. So what are some things forward thinking that you feel as though congregants of the church capital C church should be intentionally allowed to talk about without fear of repercussions? And to not do so will damage people or the church as a whole?

Nathan Jacobs 48:11

Oh, well, I think I probably answer that in two different ways. I mean, the one is, I think, I think all of the topics should be up for grabs. I mean, if you, you, I mean, you know, the film becoming truly human. You know that my whole journey toward orthodoxy into orthodoxy, had everything to do with delving deep into philosophical and theological history. And it was, as I think I talked about this a little bit in our her first interview way back when, what I mentioned that that actually was the very thing that pushed me away from Western Christianity. And I embraced the doubt of the philosophers and I became a student of Kant and liveness, and modern philosophy, and then sort of anyway, on and on, and when, until I sort of worked my way back around and ended up in Eastern Orthodoxy. But I think, you know, I questions are the sort of thing if you have a good guide, right, it's always hard when you ask good questions, but you don't have good works or answers. So it's important that you have some good guides to help the answers. Just Google. Yeah, just know, don't just, but,

but. But, but, no, I mean, I think, a lot of the questions so if you look at I'm a big fan of hard questions, right? And so if, for example, you looked at my not my substack but just my my publishing stuff, I spent a lot of time with Immanuel Kant, Kant supposedly the all destroyer of metaphysics and the enemy of Christianity and all this sort of stuff. And, and, you know, I did a whole article on Kant's objection to divine revelation, right. He thinks if God were to reveal himself, you know, we wouldn't couldn't even know it's God talking all this sort of stuff like that. And I grapple with that I'm like, Okay, well Let's hear it Kant, right. Like, let's hear the case and grapple with it. And so I really do think, as somebody who's confident that, you know, Christianity is true. I think all the questions are great, and up for grabs, mainly because I think they all have answers. And I think wrestling with them is fruitful. Right. And so like, I think that's true. Now, I think there's other things, though, that are best wrestled with not in a public forum, but in a private forum, right. You know, you brought up, you know, sexual issues, something like that. On the one hand there sort of like the I don't want to go down that rabbit hole, but just suffice to say that in our context, it tends to be a sort of socio political issue that then like is all about the public forum dispute. And my main question is, let's, let's pretend for a moment that, you know, I'm homosexual and, and let's pretend for a moment that I have a conscience problem with that. And I'm like, I don't know. Should I have a conscience problem? Should I not? How do I deal with this spiritually? What do I do? I don't think the public square is the most fruitful place for that. My spiritual father speaking from an orthodox perspective, my spiritual father is the one who is the best person to address that because it's, it's about me, right? It's not, it's not about the public square, it's about me. I'll give you an example of one such sort of very orthodox story. There's a story of this drunken monk, right? Where there was this one monk who so many people looked at, and they were like, Oh, he's such an embarrassment monastery, because every day he's smashed. And like, all the people of the town know it, and all the other monks know it. It's so scandalous. And what do we do with this guy eventually, eventually dies. The other books are like, it's about time, we can now get our reputation back. And, and one of one of the things that happens is that, at the, at the you are at the, you know, at the funeral, the abbot of the monastery talks about how this was a very good monk. And everybody's like, what is he talking about a good month ago, was

Seth Price 52:21

it a drink together, it definitely drank together. And, and

Nathan Jacobs 52:25

his ads, and he tells the story that this guy, when he was an infant was born in a war torn area. And his parents had to smuggle him across, you know, the sort of enemy line type things. And the only way to keep him silent as an infant was to feed him vodka. And so they he was a raging alcoholic, from infancy forward, came by it on. Yeah. And he came to the monastery. And he came to the monastery. And the, and the abbot was like, I mean, he's like, he was drinking like something absurd. I don't know, like, you know, you know, six, you know, six things. 12 packs of beer are like, I don't know, I mean, completely outrageous per day. And the abbot said, for your obedience, I want you to drink one less beer a day for a year. And so he did. And then the next year, he's like, I want you to drink one less beer a day for a year. And he did and kept on doing that he's like, and when he died, he was down to only six beers a day. Right? Yeah. And it's progress, you know, and he was an obedient monk, right? This is a very sort of Orthodox story. It's a very orthodox way of thinking about spirituality and things like that. But it's part of the reason why, you know, a discussion in the public square about drunkenness, and that drunkenness is sin and all these sorts of thing that's not going to help that guy. What that guy needed is a wise spiritual father, like his habit that he had. And thankfully, he had one, right. And I think what oftentimes happens in the public discussion of so many things that are deeply personal and deeply relevant to a person's soul is that the person that they're most relevant to gets lost in the discussion. And so anyway, I that's where I would say I'd say all the questions, all the discussions are good, all of them are up for grabs. I, I love good hard questions and wrestling with them. But I also think that there's a need for wisdom of the appropriate time and place and people they have those discussions with, I suppose that would be my next.

Seth Price 54:33

Yeah. So I said two questions. I have three because the other one, this one should be quick. So at the beginning of the four part series, you say, I don't know if this is a good argument, but I will say that the gentleman is now an orthodox convert. So what was he? What wasn't prior?

Nathan Jacobs 54:47

Did I say I didn't know if it was if it was, No, I am.

Seth Price 54:51

I am implying that but you definitely say Hold on. I'll find it now cuz I don't want to I don't want to put words in your mouth. Let's see. Here's what I send in the final manuscript.

Nathan Jacobs 55:00

I think it's a good art. Yeah.

Seth Price 55:00

You say, I don't know whether or not my friend was persuaded, but he's now an orthodox convert. So Oh, is

Unknown Speaker 55:06

that what I said? Okay.

Seth Price 55:08

What was he prior?

Nathan Jacobs 55:11

I think he was like Plymouth Brethren,

Seth Price 55:13

I don't even know what that. Yeah. Okay, there's a lot of denominations.

Nathan Jacobs 55:17

Right? It's pretty, it's a very conservative Protestant. You know, denomination was actually ordained. I think within it too. Hmm. So

Seth Price 55:27

fun. So when you try to put words to whatever God is, what do you say to that?

Nathan Jacobs 55:33

Oh, so this goes to a topic that I find deeply fascinating. Okay. So, again, I'm always gonna speak from an Eastern perspective here, because I know that's kind of what you that's what you want to know. Because I'm, that's my personal, I

Seth Price 55:49

just want your answer. If it happens to be easy, that's fine. care what perspective

Nathan Jacobs 55:53

so? So and this kind of goes to one of the things that I talked about in the article where I talked about the difference between Espanola, hyperuricemia, 's and all these sorts of fancy terms like that. There's a tendency to talk about God, as if he's, you know, he's beyond, right. And he's in comprehensible. And we only speak negatively about him. And there's certainly like patristic precedents for that, where they talk about these great cloud of unknowing and you send into it and right, you leave behind all these sorts of things in the sense of a world. And there's plenty of stuff like that. But there's this other aspect of it that I think is so critical in the doctrine of God. Again, this is something that's central in eastern thinking, but it's so often lost in the West, is this distinction between the essence and the energies of God? And so the energies is this, this concept that emerges from Aristotle, he's originally develops it in reference to the unmoved mover, because he needs a term to describe how God does stuff but doesn't mutate right, because he too, has got on that other side of the non mutated line. And so he draws a distinction between Kinesis which is sort of this incomplete nutritive sequential activity, and enter Gaya, which is sort of this perfect, complete activity. And Alexandrian Jews pick up on them, they're like, they think this is really useful. They like this good way of talking about God. And so they start to use the term to but they draw a distinction. Philo of Alexandria in particular draws a distinction that Aristotle doesn't draw, which is the difference between God's essence and his energies. And, and he draws us because of the conversation that Moses has with God, where he's like, show me your glory. And he's like, you can't see my face. No man can see my face and live but I'll show you my back. And I was like, Well, what the heck does that mean? And Philo concludes that God's face is the essence of God, this sort of abyss of unarticulated divinity, that we can't possibly stare into or grasp because our mind thinks in sort of finite categories, and he's like, but the energies are his back, right? These things that exude from, you know, the nature of God. And so now that's probably sounds really all very abstract. But the analogy that I like to use to sort of articulate you know, sort of help explain this is let's pretend you know, I've got I've got a musician here. It's Bach reanimated from the dead. Alright, so we've got Bach here. And I'm like, Hey, so that he ever heard of bach,

Seth Price 58:26

bach, the one that was deaf?

Nathan Jacobs 58:28

No, that's Baito. Okay. It's Beethoven. Right? But but it is, like you've never heard of Bach says, like, Oh, he's in great music. And I started to say all this laudatory, right? Oh, he's so good. You know? Oh, so brilliant. So creative. And you're like, Yeah, okay, that's great. I can. I've learned how highly you think of him. But I don't really know too much what that actually means for him. And I'm like, Okay. Well, since I can't open up his chest and show you the unarticulated creativity that sits there, I'll give him a piano. And now listen to him. And then he just plays a movement and he plays another movement. And so now, every movement he plays is an expression or an articulation of that creativity, right? And each one like they don't exhaust it, right. One movement doesn't exhaust the creativity, completely different, one different one. And so there's a distinction, but there's still a connection, right? The the articulation is an extension or an expression of the creativity of finite circumscribed articulation. But it's not sort of the unarticulated creativity as such. And this is really kind of how at least this aspect of the essence energies distinction comes down. The Yes, it's true. When we talk about God and who God is they use the term hyper crusius, which means he's above forms right so unlike triangles, which you have definite properties, like three sightedness they can read your mind around. God doesn't have any of those definite properties, right? He is this sort of abyss of goodness, you know, and that, you know, this infinite sum of negative terms. And this way you had apophatic Yep, language or negative language about God. But a lot of people will stop there. And they'll just talk about this negative language about what God is and he can't get your mind around him. But in the essence energies distinction they actually suggest but the energies you can grasp. Just like with Bach, yeah, I can't stare into his chest at the abyss of creativity. That's unarticulated. But I can listen to him play something. And they suggest that that's, that's true of me. Right? That's true of you. Like I, you know, we spend hours and hours and hours together, I still can't like stare at your unarticulated nature, right, I get to know who you are through how its expressed, how it's articulated. And so in this way, what you start to see is, well, how do you come to know God? How do you think about God? You think about him, primarily, you learn it through how God articulates himself in Providence, in mercy in love in his activities in these energies that exude from him holiness, and so on. And there's another application of that, that I'd like to mention, but I don't know if I don't want to, we've only go for 24. Okay, go for it. So, here's another thing that I think is sort of really fascinating about how the Eastern fathers talk about God. And I mentioned this in one of the letters, I read a letter to a woman who lost several children. I don't know if you saw that one in the substack list. But in there, I talk about this one at greater length, so I'll just sort of do a cursory version of it. But in Western thinking, there's a tendency to think because there's this sort of tendency in the enlightenment, in modernity, to think of the world in these sort of mechanical terms like a clock, there's a tendency to think of the spiritual stuff is like outside of IT. And especially, you know, in modernity, it's not even clear that there's any angels or anything like that. So there's like, there's maybe just God outside of it. And you have this sort of God world divide. And so when you talk about God showing up or revealing himself, there's this tendency to almost think about God revealing himself, like he would show up as an object in the room. Right? And so if you and I are sitting here going, where is God, God, where are you, we we'd be looking for like an orb, or something, an object that shows up that, like, here he is this object. While you may have the often ease, right, things like that in the Old Testament, and things like that, that, that do sort of fit something akin to that. One of the things that's really fascinating in the eastern fathers is the idea that the primary mode by which God shows up and manifests itself is actually in in through creatures. So there's very few instances in scripture where God shows up unmediated. Right usually shows up in in through a prophet and and through an angel, right, in some elements, or, you know, in some of these cases in the office.

Seth Price 1:03:20

Yeah, a bush a donkey. Yeah,

Nathan Jacobs 1:03:23

but one of the things that, but when you consider that, I mean, one of the analogies that sometimes used to talk about this sort of concept of like mediation in the east, like the sort of mediated experiences is this analogy of metal and fire. And this sort of goes to another aspect of the divine energies. The divine energies, one of the things that people like Philo developed with the concept was the idea that the energies are communicable, right? So how do you explain a demoniac having knowledge or strength that he shouldn't have? Well, he's being energized by a demon, right? How do you explain you know, a prophet who is, you know, able to do superhuman things, right? perform miracles, well, he's being energized by God, right? That's that's sort of concept. And they would use one of the favorite analogies they would use is metal and fire. Whoa.

Seth Price 1:04:18

Okay. Give me one second. They won't be quiet. Okay. They scared me though. Sorry,

Nathan Jacobs 1:04:28

no prob. So, so one of the favorite analogies to talk about this sort of like communicable energy, right was the analogy of metal and fire. And so if you take metal you stick it in fire and heats up, it gets the point that it glows and it burns and you can take it out. And you know, you can burn stuff at aluminates you know, it's it's got these energies in it, that express the nature of fire. Now, the idea is, it's still metal, right, but something of the nature Fire, the energies that express the nature of fire have taken up residence in a metal it is now it is now energized by it. And that's how they tended to think about this concept of communicable energies. And so the idea is that, yes, the energies of God. In the West, what is typically called the attributes, but in the East their energies, right, His holiness, His righteousness, you know, all these sorts of, you know, his justice, mercy, all these sorts of things like, these are all energies in corruption, immortality, right are things that can be communicated to creatures. And in fact, that's part of the hope of the Gospel is that we can somehow have those communicated to us. But one of the things that comes out of this is also what I find so fascinating is that in the east, this point that the communicable also goes to one of the ways in which the Eastern fathers talk about how we're supposed to in an unfallen, uncorrupted world experience God's see God encounter God, no, God. Let's take our metal and rather than just it being generic, you know, metal rod or something like that. Let's say it's a branding iron, right? And so I heat it up, I take it over to a cow, I burn the cow, right? Well, is the cow. Like, how far does that fire feel from the cow? Right? Like, presumably, the fire feels pretty close. Yeah. And the reason is, because the metal is actually now a conduit, right? It's actually brought the nature of fire near to the cow, the cow is actually experiencing the fire now, how it's experiencing it is mediated, shaped by the metal, right, but it's still experiencing the fire. That's the nature of fire it is experiencing? Well, the the reason this is important is because in the eastern fathers, what they see is that us as icons of Gods angels, as it's tough to find passages where they actually call them icons, but following the rationale, it would seem they are icons of God, do. We actually exist in order to be conduits of God? Like you exist as an icon of God in order to participate in the attributes of God, just like the branding iron. And so the idea would be that an unfallen world a world as it's supposed to be, I don't find God in between you and me. I look at you as an energized icon of God, and I see God. So just like, yes, it would be shaped by you, just like my branding, iron shapes, how the cow experiences the fire, but it's still really experiencing the fire. And so in you, I'd be really experiencing God. It would really be God that I'm looking at that I'm hearing that I'm encountering. And, and the reason I think that's so fascinating is because in the West mediator, and I think it's probably because the legal connotations tended to think in terms of separation between right talk to my attorney, don't talk to me, right? That's how we tend to think about mediation or mediators in the West, but in the East mediators, like the angels and humans and things like that, they actually bring the subject near. So rather than standing between and being a hindrance to the thing, you actually bring the thing near, just like the branding iron mediates fire to the cow. So you, as an icon of God is meant to mediate God to other things in creation, the angels are made to mediate God, that the rest of creation. And so there's a real sense in which Providence as it's conceived by the Eastern fathers is actually that we should see an encounter of God in one another. And incidentally, this would explain why God seems very hidden. When all the conduits and all the icons refuse to cooperate, and we sort of shut that down. Yeah, God would seem very hidden and very absent. Yeah. Because you're supposed to be the means by which I encounter him. I'm supposed to be the means by which you encounter so we're at

Seth Price 1:09:09

both times, both the the person being branded and the branding iron at both times.

Nathan Jacobs 1:09:17

That's right. That's right. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. We you have a direct Yes, that's right, where you're being energized by God. But then being energized. Hmm. I mean, so like in, in my tradition, we have elders and elders are not like people who sit on a board or something like that elders are actually its charismatic office, where these are usually like wonderworking living saints, right? People like Elijah who walk around on their PCs being one that you could look up. And we have an unbroken chain of these all throughout our history. But you listen to these stories, where you sit down with the elder and, you know, he tells you secret knowledge about yourself. He performs a miracle he does. If I'm having a cup with somebody like that, God doesn't seem very absent in that moment. In fact, he's feels very present. If an angel were to show up here and start talking to me, I presume God would not feel very APSE moment he would feel very present. But that's what's supposed to be normal. Right? Like that's what the norm is supposed to be. So there's a real sense in which the way in which we currently exist, where it's like, I can't see God, where is God? That's, that's not the way things are supposed to be.

Seth Price 1:10:30

Hmm, I'm gonna read, I'm gonna paraphrase what you just said, because it's what came into my mind. So the way we're supposed to be is the way that it is when the veil is torn, and we've intentionally then just erected new veils. Is that Is that fair?

Nathan Jacobs 1:10:44

That's yeah, I mean, I would say that's, that's kind of fair. I know. I'd say it's fair, and sort of the veil language doesn't it sort of loses the mediator language. But yeah, there's really supposed to be a sense in which, yes, like, just like people who saw Moses and his face is glowing with divine glory. And they're seeing the glory of God, right in Moses, his face, and they're freaked out. Because that's not normal. People don't do that. And he's gotta like, put availa right to use your veil language. Yeah. That would actually be the I mean, if you want to combine the two, right, that's kind of your veil language, right? Is that the way people saw Moses? That's what you should see all the time, throughout all of creation. But we're all walking around with veils and

Seth Price 1:11:29

Rita. Yeah. So you talked about the sub stack? Where do you want people to go to do whatever it is that they should be doing as it relates to the work that you're doing?

Nathan Jacobs 1:11:40

Oh, I don't know. I mean, if if, if somebody wants to know what I think about things, or they think any of the insights I can offer, or helpful, or whatever, I'd say just subscribe to substack. Right. So do I have to say it again? Or will

Seth Price 1:11:52

he put out a post or something? I'll post it? Yeah, absolutely.

Nathan Jacobs 1:11:55

So. So I mean, these letters were sometimes I think, when people are looking at them, they're, they're treating them. I'll hear people refer to these as articles. And it's like, these are not articles. These are literally I sit down to write an answer to a question going off the cuff to somebody. And my intent in the original letter is always to help the person, right. I don't know if I'm always helpful, but you know, that's the intent, at least help clear something else. Clear something out, bring clarity, bring insight. And so the hope is that, you know, there are other people who might benefit from those as well. And so I would say anybody who wants to see if it's beneficial, subscribe, right? If you want to support my work, you can be a paid subscriber. Can

Seth Price 1:12:42

you submit a question there? Is there like a button that says, shoot me a question?

Nathan Jacobs 1:12:47

I, there's not a button on there. But if you go to my website, there is a place where there's there's a contact form? And that's normally where people who know, send me questions. Yeah. And so people can do that. Now. I can't give it how long how long the responses are that I write usually takes a while for me to get back. I mean, sometimes I knock it out in a single sitting, you know, the next day. But I know I'm, I'm working my way through a couple of questions that I just got, yeah, that'll end up on the sub stack eventually. So people are free to write to me. And asked me a question. And they might, they might hear back unless, of course, I start. Thanks to us now get like that, well, I'm just picking which questions I like.

Seth Price 1:13:36

Well, I'm not I'm not intending to create problems. So Nathan, as always, man, I I really enjoy talking to you. Yeah, it's fun. Thank you. Thanks for humoring me as I ramble through a question. That's the downside of not scripting them. So? Well, fair enough. So good. Good, good.

Nathan Jacobs 1:13:59

Well, the only thing I would say is I feel like we sort of set up the problem of begotten not made. Yeah. And I never really said much about the answer. We could do horse riding. Could I try to summarize an answer in like, three minutes?

Seth Price 1:14:13

You can take longer than three if you need it. Sure. Yeah. I have five hours left on this memory card. So okay,

Nathan Jacobs 1:14:18

well, I don't have five hours left on the clock. But I mean, I think I think we sort of I think we established pretty clearly the whole like mutability and difference between God and creatures, and why that that issue is so significant. What I just say is that if you go if you know that if you hold on to that you recognize this sort of difference between the mutable right, this is what a creature is, right? It comes into being that means it's mutable, etc, etc. You look at that as entailing corruption. Now, you see this creaturely problem. And you see that the hope of, you know, creatures is to partake of this divine nature that's on the other side of that line. That's incorrect. ductable that's immortal, that's immutable, and so on. And that's why it's critical to affirm that the Son of God, if Christianity is really going to offer hope to people, then it's critical that the Son of God actually has that nature. Right that he's on that divine side of that line, I would say that all the different answers I work through in the article just by way of summary, they highlight all the sort of differences between God and creatures that inform the begotten, not made distinction. So what I go through in there, for example, is I numerate all some of the metaphysical entailments of being a creature. And then what I do is I talk about the negative, the apathetic descriptions of eternal generation that they offer, right? He is not material, he does not come into being, you know, he is, you know, not finite, etc, etc. And so there's all the negative things which are really just to say, it's not that. And then there's a few positive things that are set in there like that. It's eternal, like that it's analogous to a father giving his same nature to his son. And then, and then the sort of the third section, I think, is where I talk about a modal difference, which is the differences that they they take it to be sort of natural for the father to be the father, right? It's inconceivable that the Father would not be get the son, where as the same isn't true of making me, right, I could not exist, right, that's a sort of free choice on the part of God. And to say that they're denying free choice with regard to generation but but you know, I might not have existed same can't be said, for any members of the Trinity. And then, and conceptually, what that really looks like in their mind, is to say, one of the analogies that I think is just a really helpful sort of placeholder to hold on to is that they use the analogy of the sun, the SU n, right sun, not this being the Son of God, but the sun, like in the sky. And the idea is, well, let's, let's pretend one of the main problems that they see conceptually happening is that people like areas think in terms of causality and only one way, what scholastics would call per accident is causation, which is that it's sequential. This happened, then this happened, then this happened. Whereas per se, causation is coterminous, right? My cup is currently suspended on the desk, and the top of the desk is suspended by the legs, right? That's a cause effect relationship. And it's ongoing, right? They're they're coterminous with each other. And so their whole point is that when you're talking about beginning in a creaturely context, I beget a son, it's per accidents, right? I begin him, I can drop dead of a heart attack, my son still exists, right? But in the Trinity, when you're talking about the causal relations, they're there, per se. And so using the sun analogy, let's pretend for a minute that the sun always existed, right? The cosmos didn't come into being it's always been and always will be, etc, etc. Would it's like always exist? Sure. What is heat? Always is this. Sure. But would it's light? And is heat be causally dependent upon it on it on the sun? And the answer is yes. And so this is sort of a picture of this sort of eternal causation, an eternal, ongoing, unending causation, where all three things are present. But two of the things are dependent on one of the thing. Yeah, right. And that's, and that's really sort of the concept of beginning if you're going to take the very sort of most basic picture beginning and precession is the idea that the Father forever begets or generates the sun and forever out breeds respire. It's the spirit. And this is a unique mode of causation, because well, they all share a common nature, which is the divine nature, and that's what places them on that side of the dividing line, as opposed to us who come into being Yeah, right. Yeah. So what my best attempt to give a short summary of what the bottom line there is,

Seth Price 1:19:09

there is a better option. There actually two, we could do a part two, whenever the schedule is aligned, or people could subscribe to the substack. There is that but you gave him the part of the answer. Um,

Nathan Jacobs 1:19:21

two topics you wanted to talk about today, and one of them we haven't even mentioned. So we could do a part two, but reserve it for that one. Let's do it. What's your second top?

Seth Price 1:19:31

Yeah, that's a headline Hades, right?

Nathan Jacobs 1:19:33

Yeah, that's Yeah, yeah, Hades.

Seth Price 1:19:35

Yeah, I actually thought about that on Sunday. I sing at my church and one of the songs literally has a lyric that says keys to death and hades in his hands. That's all I thought about was after that, and then it's anyway, it's hard to anyway, doesn't matter. Nathan enjoyed it, man. Really much. Yeah.

Nathan Jacobs 1:19:51

Thanks for having me. I appreciate it.

Seth Price 1:20:19

Now, I haven't added it up. But there are hundreds of 1000s, if not millions of podcasts on the internet, and I am humbled that you continue to download this one. This is your first time here. Please know that there are transcripts of these shows. Not always in real time, but I do my best. And if you go back in the logs, you can find transcripts for pretty much any episode that you'd like the show is recorded and edited by me, but it is produced by the patron supporters of the show. That is one of the best, if not the best way that you can support the show. If you get anything at all out of these episodes, if you think on them, or if you you know, you're out and about and you tell your friends about it or Hey, mom, dad, brother, sister, friend, boss, Pastor, here's what I heard, what are your thoughts on that? If this is helping you in any way, and it is helping me consider supporting the show in that manner. It is extremely inexpensive, but collectively, it is so very much helpful for you. I pray that you are blessed. And you know that you're cherished and beloved. We'll talk soon