12 Lies That Hold America Captive with Jonathan Walton / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Jonathan Walton 0:00

Look at the book of Acts, particularly Acts 1-7, and take notes of what the disciples did. And then say, does my Christianity look like this? If it doesn't (then) how can it begin to look like this? When was the last time I baptize somebody? Now I know folks might get upset, right? But when was the last time I baptize somebody? When was the last time I cast demons out of somebody? When was the last time I prayed for healing for someone? When was the last time I testified at work to the goodness of God? When was the last time…like if we're not doing those things? What are we doing? And so I think I like to say, if we ran our personal lives in our small groups or beta groups or life groups or cell groups, whatever you want to call them through an Acts filter, would we come out looking like followers of Jesus from the Scripture? If we're not, then we might want to reconsider the kind of trees that we are that we bear any fruit.

Seth Price 1:29

Welcome to the year of our Lord Jesus Christ 2019 Can I Say This At Church is still hear because churches are still here and I still have things that I want to say and you have things that hopefully you want to say and I need you to tell me what those things are. (If) There's anything any topic, anything that you would like to hear covered, a conversation that you would love to hear a guest that you would love to hear, please shoot me an email, go to the website CanISayThisAtChurch.com and hit the leave feedback button there and get in touch with me. Let me know who those people are, what you want to hear why you want to hear it, shoot, if you have something to say, maybe you'll come on. Let's do this together.

If you have not yet done this, please make a new year's resolution to take the 27 seconds that it takes in review the show on iTunes, or podbean, or wherever you downloaded this show. And if you can't do that, tell a friend about the show, share it with them, the more voices the better.

So you probably over the course of the holidays, hopefully, we're able to avoid the arguments that we see on Facebook, and on Twitter, and online and on the news, and on MSNBC and Fox News about things like you know, “America is a Christian nation” and “all people are created equal”, “And we're the land of the free and the home of the brave”, and “we're the best thing happening since sliced bread” and “we invented the Bible”, which that's, that's a bit hyperbolic, but you get where I'm going with that none of that's true. There's so much of our history, specifically the history of America, and how the church is interwoven. The part that religion and politics have played, as those two have become embedded together and synonymous sometimes with each other. And by the way, that's not an attack on the GOP. And it's not an attack on the Democrats either both sides are equally culpable.

And so Jonathan Walton has written a book called 12 Lies That Hold America captive. And so I had him come on, and we discuss that a bit. I do want to give you a little bit of warning, because life is the way that it is. This was recorded with Jonathan sitting in a Starbucks. And so you're going to hear people scraping food, and a little bit of doors opening and closing. And to be honest, the content is good enough that that doesn't matter. And you'll find that about five minutes and you'll forget that those people are even there.

I'm honestly glad that other people sitting did hear him talking the way that he was talking about the church and really things that matter. And so I really hope that you love this episode. I really hope that you'll get this book. I believe that it has the ability to open your eyes, I know it certainly opened my eyes. I had to read it in small chunks because I found myself getting infuriated. Not because I didn't know things, but because I didn't know that I didn't know things. And I've since then gone off the rabbit hole that with American history and I've loved every minute of it. I still get upset often about it, but that's okay. That is life. And so here we go 12 Lies That Hold America Captive, and most importantly, the truth that sets us free with Jonathan Walton.

Seth Price 4:50

Jonathan Walton. So, first off, man, welcome to the show. Thank you for making time in the middle of Pennsylvania. And for those listening you're going to see, or you're going to hear…you won't see anybody, you're gonna hear random people in the back maybe ordering an espresso or whatever they need at Starbucks a nice scone, but either way, so bear with a little bit of background noise but Jonathan, man, thank you so much for coming on.

Jonathan Walton 5:15

Absolutely man. I'm glad I could be a part of this podcast, I enjoy it, and I’m really glad I’ve been able to listen to the last few episodes.

Seth Price 5:25

Really?

Jonathan Walton 5:26

Yeah, probably listened to about 10 episodes so far. I really like the Brueggeman episode. I really like the Kathy Khang episode. I really liked another episode that you did, my favorite one by far, Brian McLaren.

Seth Price 5:40

Brian, is fantastic.

Jonathan Walton 5:42

That one is great. Anyway, people need to listen to your podcast.

Seth Price 5:48

I agree! Before we get into the topic at hand of your book that it's out in January, right?

Jonathan Walton 5:55

Hmm, yeah, well, people could get it before Christmas actually really. If they Pre-ordered IV Press, they get it the second week of December.

Seth Price 6:04

Nice.

So tell me a bit about yourself. So I know we talked about it a little bit by email. But what's kind of your upbringing? I know you're from South Central Virginia, kind of kind of south of Richmond. And when I read a little bit of where you're from us, I googled it, like, I know, right where that is. I didn't know the name where it was until I saw where it was geographically. And I was like, okay, but what is a little bit of you man?

Jonathan Walton 6:29

I was born in Alexandria, actually, before I can, you know, benefit from some of the best schools in the United States and stuff like that we moved back to where my mom grew up, which is Broadnax, Virginia. So when I was one, I don’t know how old our house is because same age, you know, so we moved when I was going back to grad next town, probably as you know, 327 people at the highest and yeah, that's where I was wrong. From never left Southern Virginia till I came to Columbia to visit and change, change everything. You know to go from rural like the epitome of rural America, where nothing is there in New York City that's supposedly the center of everything. Yeah, that's kind of like my life.

Seth Price 7:22

Yeah. So what was that…what was growing up…were you Christian growing up?

Jonathan Walton 7:30

The answer that question changes in my learn about Jesus.

Seth Price 7:35

Okay, we'll say quote, “Christian”

Jonathan Walton 7:39

So Ruby Bridges talks about “black folk religion”, which I think has elements of Christianity in it, and I think has elements of Jesus in it. And there are people who grew up like I grew up going to church every Sunday and Wednesday and cleaning the church and going through Revival and all that stuff. Doing lots of Christian things, but never actually participating in the redemptive God. And so I would say I was until I had an encounter with God. I had a motorcycle accident, I was 16 why I didn't get injured. I jumped the intersection or Harley Davidson in Virginia…

Seth Price 8:20

That was on purpose or that was on accident?

Jonathan Walton 8:23

Definitely not on purpose. And then I think I realized, oh, like, God is trying to tell me something. Now, I still was looking at porn and still running after women and still doing all the things that I thought were perfectly fine and do me a Christian. But I knew that Jesus wanted to say something. So I started writing and writing poetry really became interacting with God and songs. And so that really became how I interacted with Him. But I wouldn't say I had a relationship with Jesus where I was submitted to Him as Lord and Savior in that way until I was 19 in Intervarsity at Columbia.

Seth Price 9:03

What was the big shift there? So was it just being outside of your comfort zone and having to find something else or was it like, here we go? Because I know for me, I left Southwest Texas and went to Liberty and really the only culture shock for me was everything isn't called “Coke” here. And you know, I grew up and I'll have a coke and they ask you what kind…I got a little pissed the first time that I say can I have a coke and didn't realize and then they brought me a Coke and I don't like Coke. And so what was it? Was it just culture shock or was it just a different church; what was the change?

Jonathan Walton 9:38

Well, I think that change is that I actually had to rely on God as opposed to how talented I was or anything like that. So I don't remember what chapter this is in the book because it's long, but I talked about like how I started out at Columbia and was basically managing my stress and anxiety with porn, over eating, and working out; those three things. I feel guilty about watching porn so I stop and then I overeat because like, that's what I did is stress eat, and I feel guilty about that and I go work out and I get injured, right. So this is like, a terrible cycle there. And long story short ended up having an encounter with God where I took a job that was, shouldn't have taken it. They offered me money to do it, an apartment in Brooklyn, like that whole deal and essentially went home one day, and my apartment was locked, because the apartment had been repossessed.

And then I found out that the money that the guy had paid me those checks had bounced. So I had paid bills from my mom and bought clothes for my job and all of a sudden I had no money in the City. And I want to say that I went to Jesus but I didn't. I went to not Bible gateway but like pornhub.com right. And obviously like after gratifying yourself in that way, that doesn't solve any problems it just creates another problem and you feel terrible. And so I was like, God, I don't want to do this anymore. I called my intervarsity staff worker at the time and just told him I was like, Yo, man, like, I'm pretending like I've been doing this church thing because I was the talented kid. And when you're talented in a black church, you get put up front, it doesn't really matter what your life is like with Jesus, and that facade kind of fell away. And I was finally able to see and hear that Jesus loved me, absent of my efforts for him, my performance for him. He didn't want an employee, or a soldier, or a worker, but he wanted his child. That was the first time I'd ever been invited into that. Yeah, so that's when I would say like, me, and Jesus actually came together.

Seth Price 11:49

Yeah, that's awesome. And can I say that's rare that someone will openly say all that, specifically the pornography. I feel like a lot of people still sweep that under the rug and we're all lying. Yeah, I forget what the song is one of my favorite artists is Propaganda and he's got a song of that I forget what it is, but it basically talks to you know, this, this, that and the other. “Forgive me, I'm lying. I'm still lying like I'm, yeah, I'm lying, and so are you.”

Jonathan Walton 12:25

Prop is great man!

Seth Price 12:26

I love ya. I love this stuff. Um, so the book that you wrote 12 Lies That Hold America Captive. That title is controversial just in and of itself, at least to the circles that I feel like, stay on the outside fringes of this show and or Central Virginia where I am now or Texas where I'm from, and you begin your book and I find it coincidence. I didn't realize that we would be talking on election night or the midterm elections (of 2018) but you've been your book with just you just hope and, and hope for the future and hope for the church and hope for America to do things better, because Barack Obama was elected and I would like you to kind of roll through some of that ending up at what you call WAFR or White America Folk Religion, which now that you talked about black folk religion. I'm not familiar with that either.

But I shared that acronym with a friend of mine who lives in Charlottesville. And he's like, yes, somebody gets it. Here we go. Somebody gets it! So talk to me a bit about that hope and why and then what destroyed or not destroyed, but what changed?

Jonathan Walton 13:46

Well, so I think there's a two that Krista Tippett On Being she did a podcast of Ruby Bridges and another civil rights leader, and they brought up this concept of black folk religion. I still have work to do within myself to figure out what the tenets of black folk religion, because that I think would involve me actually diving into my genogram. Like, what did my family worship? What did that mean in 1619? You know, like over the last 400 years, what were we being invited into, but not just invited into the what we tried to make into our own version of gospel when it was illegal for us to read, it was under white supervision, and it's not an ethnic Pacific church, but a racially segregated church where the gospel grows in a different way.

RAnd so I still have some work to do around that. I think what I began to understand more, though, is not necessarily what I gave up, but what I was invited into, which is White American Folk Religion. Mm hmm. I remember getting an email from one of the editors and he said, you know, where's this term come from? Where'd you get it? Like who came up with it like and try to substantiate Well, no, I made it up because I see it at work in my own life. And so if we think about a race, class, gender based hierarchy, and the worship of militarism, racism; and Martin Luther King talked about this, and Rich Villodas talked and added another one-where we have materialism, racism, militarism, and if you add sexuality, that's what you get before us today. Like, if we take and literally analyze the invitation of the “people who framed the Constitution” of this nation, and if we take the same idea of who is in the room? Who is this for? What was the author's intent? Who's impacted? You kind of have two options.

We could take the hopeful stance and say like, “well, maybe they were writing with the intention of one day including everyone and all these aspirational goals”. Or you could take the stance of like, integrity like how did they actually live their lives? Because they weren't people absence of power these were people who had power; so what did they do with it even with the goals and aspirations that they had? Because these weren't people who couldn't exact their will upon the world. These are people who were enacting their will upon the world. So what did they will the world look like?

And so I think that first chapter really draws a picture of like, I came (to college), I graduated Barak Obama became President, and I had a daughter when Donald Trump got elected, and the way that that completely changed and what did it mean for me to be black in America? What does it mean for me not to be black in the Kingdom of God? Because race doesn't exist in heaven. So there's no black people or white people in heaven there is no ethnos…I don't know who my people are.

So God, what does that mean for me hang out in this now and not yet place. I must need to be discipled out of something so that I can actually know what it's like to be loved by you in the fullness of who I am, even though I don't know what that ethnic identity is, because it was taken from somewhere a while back. And so I think, coming up with a term for what I believe the idol that I was invited into, not just me, but all people in America are being invited into because the vision that's passed by Jefferson and Hamilton and all these people is literally another guy. It's literally another thing. It's literally another way of life. Because if faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen'; we will never see the American Dream yet we believe in it all the time.

Seth Price 17:39

We do not have time to talk about all 12 lies, and I'm not I still haven't decided which two or three I really want to hone in on but I will I will tell everyone listening all 12 lies literally…so something Jonathan, I couldn't do. I wasn't able to. Like I've read other books and I've been able to read it in like a day day and a half sometimes like like Kathy, you talked about Kathy Khang earlier, like I read that book in two hours. It was beautiful, right? It was hard. And it was it was just amazing.

But other books like I literally have to sit with because either pissed me off or I'm not ready for that like the Eternal Current was one Alexander Shaia’s stuff was one. Austin Fischers Faith in the Shadows. Like, I just had to read it and then I need to back away for a minute. And in each of these lies I was that way.

So what I wasn't expecting being with your background and a little bit I knew about you from the Google is I wasn't expecting to get as much history as I got in it. But I really appreciated that and I like the way that you weaved in the context of both Native Americans as well as anyone else that doesn't happen to be white. Because I feel like…like the Dawes Act I'd never heard of that. I remember I'm pretty sure I put it on Facebook and tagged you to it like I was actually pissed that I'd never heard of the Dawes Act until I read about it in your book. And then I google it and the more that I google and I go down a little rabbit hole, I'm just so angry, like, just so angry.

And so as people are reading this, before we dive into some of these lies, what do I do with that anger? Because sometimes I'm still angry, like I read a little bit tonight, specifically, what you were just referencing with the different races, creeds, genders, and the different view from Revelation on this is who's in the kingdom of God. And here's how we categorize people and we're doing it wrong you and I right now, here's how we should do it. But I don't know how to sit with that anger. Like, just don't know how to sit with it.

Jonathan Walton 19:40

Yeah, so I wish that I had written the book that I'm writing now before I wrote this. What I'm working on right now is the emotionally healthy activist. Taking a lot of Pete Scazzero’s emotionally healthy leader stuff, and with his blessing, like creating a how do we deal with this using the skills that he brings up like incarnational listening, like writing ourselves in the Scripture, like entering into pain and suffering with Jesus at the center and make that a systemic thing, not just a personal or relational thing. We're actually going to have a course for eight weeks gonna be live stream in March and April, specifically, because people don't know what to do when they are pissed off.

Seth Price 20:20

Yeah, yeah. So I take it I'm not the only one that said that then?

Jonathan Walton 20:24

No, no. And I mean, people are going to be angry tonight. Right? Whatever happens, and I think there's, um, there's a couple things that are helpful. One is that anger is a good thing. Like our emotions are not bad. Like they are signals for what God is doing and like what we're passionate about. So being angry is okay. I was told the anger was bad, so I stopped it. But if we cut off, like we can't bifurcate our hearts, so if we don't allow ourselves to be angry, we don't actually allow ourselves to experience joy. sorrow, emotional spectrum becomes really, really short which does doesn't allow us to enter into the holy discontent of God. So I think that the anger that we're being invited into, it will lead to holy discontent. So there's a constructive dissonance that happens when we get angry if we bring it to God.

Seth Price 21:18

So break that down a bit. When you say holy discontent. What is that? What does that mean?

Jonathan Walton 21:25

Yes, so holy discontent would be…the way that we define it, there's lots of definitions out there, but specifically Intervarsity in New York and New Jersey, you have a holy discontent initiative, where we say like, what does it look like to enter into the lament of the world and the longing for the Kingdom? So if you're going to omit you actually have to allow yourself to be uncomfortable, because there is a direct line between not just spiritual maturity and emotional health. But there's also direct lines between our level of holy discontent and our emotional health. Because if we can't get angry you cannot lament. Right, if we're not willing to engage with the suffering and the pain and the struggle, it can't moment, and if we don't know how terrible the world is, and how terrible brokenness and violence and sinfulness is, then we don't actually know or can enter into how beautiful, the gospel, that's how wonderful redemption is how amazing the prospect of renewal of all things, just by virtue of the will God and are entering into that because of Jesus. We get the full breadth of lamenting the suffering in the world, and longing for his kingdom to come in full. And we get this beautiful dissonance that I think is captured in the cross where there is deep brokenness, that the exact same time, the transformative power happening simultaneously. And that's what's happening when we get angry. We're actually entering into the frustrating part of that and that anger, I think we can turn into constructive dissonance that drives us to seek justice in a way that makes space for the pain of people that we're going to enter it with.

Seth Price 22:59

If you were to concisely Tell me what White American Folk Religion is, and by concisely like, you know, the Baptist would have the Baptist Faith and Message or the Evangelical Covenant Church would say this or the Catholics would say this, the Jesuits would say that like, what is if we're going to make it as you kind of you kind of make it its own denomination in the book of lumping. Yes, this type of Protestantism is not separate. It's it's this it doesn't really matter what brand you put on top of it. Pepsi, Pepsi is Pepsi doesn't really matter what label we put on it. So if you were to concisely put it down what is white America folk religion in general?

Jonathan Walton 23:39

Out of Ephesians 2, we talk about the spirit of the age and the prince of the power of the air. So this is a spiritual thing, right? So we have white, which is a race, class, gender based hierarchy. Right, white American, it's tied to a place it's tied to locality, geography, and then folk basically being like, we are taking a genuine faith and co-opting it in such a way that it can pass as the faith itself even though it's been changed drastically. And then religion is a certain set of agreed upon practices that everyone involved says this is this is what it means to be a good boy. Right and the way that that will play out it's like there are lots of people, whatever your skin color that are pursuing White American Folk Religion. When we say I am going to pursue life, liberty, and happiness, it is impossible to pursue life liberty and happiness and take up your cross deny yourself and follow Jesus. They are completely antithetical to each other.

Seth Price 25:31

Let's get into that then because pursuit of life liberty and well, the Declaration of Independence. Basically what you're calling out in line one the fact that you know America is a Christian nation and you'll see it you'll see it tonight depending on who wins and whatever the state's you know, Franklin Graham, Pat Robertson's will come out or the you know, Jerry Falwell, Jr. will come out and why is that a lie? Let me posture this way. I'm going to take the stance that you're wrong. So you tell me why don't you tell me why it's a lie? I don't want us to agree with each other all night. So why are Why am I not part of a Christian nation or why is America not one?

Jonathan Walton 26:12

Yeah. So I think the most common argument is to say, well look at how much sin we've committed as a as a quote unquote, nation, right. But I actually think that the where it came alive for me is actually, at the end of the Gospel of Matthew and the beginning of the book of Acts, when Peter is repeatedly looking for a political solution to an existential crisis, right? He is repeatedly looking for like the overthrow of the Roman government, so that like God's kingdom can come as God and God is actually about something very different. So yes, the United States is not a Christian nation, because there's nothing in line with the formation of that nation that would reflect the Kingdom of God. But I think the real answer lies in the Great Commission where we're to go forward, and make disciples cast out demons, heal the sick and baptize people and name the Father, Son, the Holy Spirit, making disciples of all people. And when that comes, that solution is Kingdom and not country. So, yes, sin, all that stuff. But the rule and reign of Jesus does not look like a democracy. It does not look like a military, it does not look like a physical state that we can all live in and claim citizenship (of) because of our race class or where we were born like it's an invitation into the grace of God and is limitless in its locale. So I think the book of Acts actually is the best apologetic for why the United States not a Christian nation because that's not actually how God set up at all.

Seth Price 27:52

Right. Should we should we strive to be a Christian nation like should that be something that we aspire too>

Jonathan Walton 28:00

I think that we need reflect the kingdom of God as best as we possibly can, so that we can point to the risen Savior is king. I think absolutely, we should do that. I don't think though that our goal or intention should be to legislate our morality because it just doesn't work like that. Yeah, it'd be nice, but it doesn't work. We have the Jesuits that tried that with native people. It didn't go over so well.

Seth Price 28:35

There's a chapter in your book and I don't know which lie it was or which chapter it was attached to but you were talking about the guy that started the Carlisle School

Jonathan Walton 28:46

Kill the Indian save the man.

Seth Price 28:48

Yeah, yeah, and I spoke about that a bit with Mark Charles and he was talking a bit about that.

Jonathan Walton 28:54

He…Wooooo! Mark Charles

Seth Price 28:56

His knowledge is something else.

Jonathan Walton 29:00

That's lie three: the melting pot.

Seth Price 29:02

Yeah, well, so the next question that would logically flow is, specifically because right now a caravan is on its way, and by the time this episode airs, it will have already come and everybody will have already continued to bicker. But that won't stop the next time that people come for asylum. And so like today, you know, you'll hear people saying, “well, we should accept immigrants because we're all immigrants”. And we should, you know, use or you'll hear people say, “Well, yeah, but Mexico offered them asylum. So they should just stop there” too, which I'd ask, Well, then, if it's good enough for Mexico, how come we're not…I thought we were exceptional, like, we're gonna let Mexico do this better than we do?

But either way, neither one of those are good arguments. And so people always say America was founded as a country of immigrants. And we're this amalgam of whatever’dness and that's what binds us together. But you say in your book, and I hope it's fine for me to quote it. That, when we do that when we say that we're all immigrants, that it is

an edited retelling of a narrative in a way that affirms the powerful and assimilates, the powerless into a lower position in the power structure.

And then you say,

for example, Christian boarding schools trying to crush out native identities. And that this was done by physically and culturally separating Native children from their elders, and basically just breaking them away from any and all culture.

And so what are you trying to say there? Because I hear you saying, you know, you can't say you're an immigrant and then strip someone of whatever makes them one.

What are you trying to say there? Cause I hear you saying you can’t say that we are a nation of immigrants and then strip them of what makes them one.

Jonathan Walton 30:40

Yes. So I think, what if we go back a little bit when we say we're all immigrants, I think what we're actually trying to do is avoid the idea that anyone is oppressed, and anyone is the oppressor. So if we're all immigrants we are all invited to become this new place. And that goes all the way back to when Europeans, the missionaries, the military, and the merchants, all came to America and how they saw this land. Some of them saw this land as the place where they could live out a pure Europe, we've messed up in Europe, we get to start over, right? That was one group of people.

And other people saw it as God's promised land where we could actually become the people of God in a way that, you know, the Jesuits or the Puritans or pick that group of people were what was actually happening though was they were trying to remake the land of America, and its people that they discovered, in the image of Europe. Which literally takes on the, you know, a twisting of Genesis 1:27, where instead of encountering people who are made the image of God, they tried to remake the people in the image of Europe, right.

And so we see that when we say we're all immigrants like the woman next door to me, she's Czechoslovakian and Polish. Her ancestors when they came to America, what happened was her name was changed, right. If I change your name and disconnect you from your lineage, you can't find your people anymore so now you're in American. When a Chinese student comes to the United States, and they said, Well, no, like, I'm not going to learn your name, your name is now Peggy or your name is “pick the thing” like my daughter is Chinese. And so when I look at her name, I can actually connect her to every generation before her because of 100 Line Chinese poem that each generation has. But if I cut that off and say, we're all immigrants, then I'm actually disconnecting you from where you come from.

So I think what happens in the language is that one, the suggestion that we're all immigrants, assumes that we all came here voluntarily as opposed to like my people as slaves, or some people as those who've been religiously persecuted, or some natives, or those from Mexico who the border simply shifted over them and they became American. And so there's, I think what happens is when we say we're all immigrants, what we're doing is trying to dismiss the fact that we have been oppressed because honestly, we don't want to talk about my mom didn't want to talk about how her birth certificate says Negro on it. Right, like, we don't like…my grandmother and I talked about this in the book she does not want to talk about like, what burning flesh that smells like and what it sounds like you don't want to tell the stories, right?

And so it's a beautiful lie and a wonderful invitation to say don't worry about that! We are all the same and we can all work at this thing together.

Seth Price 33:58

Do you think this isn't a fair question? Do you think if say, like people like your grandma or your mom had been willing to say, No, sit down, Jonathan, I need to tell you something, this is gonna, it's gonna piss you off, it's gonna change your life. And maybe if they did that either in a family setting or in a public setting that our religion, our faith, our country, would be different now, have they done that 50 years ago and dealt with that pain and strife? Or was that just not possible, then for them to even have the freedoms a bad word, the liberty to be able to do that?

Jonathan Walton 34:32

Well, so I think the conversation happens when our safety is in question. So I had that conversation with my mom, but only when she thought I might get shot. Or she thought she thought I might end up in a compromising situation.

So I remember distinctly. I mean, the KKK is all through South right. I distinctly remember my mind handing my book to someone, and them being like I don't want to read that.

Seth Price 35:06

This one?

Jonathan Walton 35:08

No, not that one, my book of poetry. And it was really interesting to me to see who was supportive of the stuff that I was writing and who wasn't, and who wanted to know what I was writing and who didn’t. And specifically, there was someone who had a Klan background and his wife did not want him to know that she was reading what I was writing. And my mom told me, she was like Jonathan, this is what you need to know about this family XYZ, right.

So I think it happens in my family when we need to be safe. And similar to the talk that most black people get about policing and stuff like that happens when safety is in question. And I don't think that it can happen when if you're talking about if we had this conversation 50 years ago, and things like that, I think those conversations were happening. I think what people did not opt to do, though, particularly people in power was to decolonize their own way of life. So it really doesn't matter how it's talked about if people are not willing to give up the stuff that comes with the opportunity structures that are set up for them.

Seth Price 36:19

And so when you say decolonize, what is that defining outside of like a Black Panther movie, which is what's made that invoke word like, what does that even mean to decolonize something?

Jonathan Walton 36:32

Yes. So me like as a black male in the United States, able bodied cisgendered all that stuff, right? Like there are places that I can step out of the race, class, gender based hierarchy that I'm invited into, to actually reflect the kingdom of God in ways that are transformative and helpful.

So an example of that is I know that as a man, people are gonna listen to me when I say specific things. And so instead of me making a comment about #metoo, and the oppression against women and patriarchy, I will suggest 10 female speakers and books instead of you getting my opinion. You should just ask the people Jim Crow for women has been set up for right. So I will limit my platform. So, basically, the idea of Philippians chapter two where I will disadvantage myself right so that the community might be lifted up.

So I will openly talk about my past of exploiting women and openly talk about my lust of money opening talk about as best as I can, like the ways that I have used the opportunity structures that have helped me to lift myself up and that by definition, subjugates other people? And so now I will like say, Okay, I'm going to intentionally make sure women are teaching in this place and intentionally make sure I'm making time for folks who are disabled or homeless in my life, slow down so that I can actually have like, I'm not gonna participate as best as I can by the grace of God in the power structures that subjugated denigrate people age in his image, even though I benefit from those systems and structures.

Seth Price 38:19

In honor of Election Day. Your lie number five is that we are a great democracy. I actually hadn't planned on this being one of my lies, but it's election day and so it has a I did take a few notes on it. Specifically, I like your lever. So you've got four levers like there's a lever of well, I feel like anyone that actually does any civics classes or any government classes knows that we're not really a democracy. We'll say that we are and then you ask an actual person that went to high school and paid attention even that hasn't been filtered out of books yet. We're not a democracy and I think people want us to be a democracy. Right? If you don't believe me just jump into Facebook and say Taco Bell sucks and see what happens. Like, it doesn't matter what you say, just you don't want to be a democracy. But why do you think that we think that we are?

Jonathan Walton 39:15

I think that we think that we are and each of the lies builds upon each other, right? So if we say that we're a Christian nation, then we define the fate of the country, an idea. Then what happens is with an immigrant, and if we're all immigrants, and we're a melting pot, then you're defining how we interact with each other. Right? And then if you define equality, right, because we're all equal, okay, let me put all man well, like this is the faith that I believe in. This is who God is. This is how he made me and what he made me do. And this is how we are to see each other. Oh, how do I have access to power when we're a democracy? So we need the illusion of inclusion, to continue to live out the faith that you're supposedly called. And so if I believe that I have power then I won't fight. I won’t rebel. And if I believe that like my vote counts, my voice counts, that my efforts, we're gonna do something like if people actually understood that the meritocracy wasn't real, and that votes actually didn't matter in the way that we think that they do then people would fight.

Seth Price 40:24

Do you think that your vote doesn't matter?

Jonathan Walton 40:28

I think it depends.

Seth Price 40:32

Okay, so today if I saw you today, do you think that your vote doesn’t matter today? I spoke about this with my brother today. We talked about Beto O'Rourke and Ted Cruz because he still lives in Texas. And he was like, Well, why wouldn't you vote for Ted Cruz. I was like, well, regardless of his politics, the dude in his career shows up less than 60% of the time to even vote. And so if I'm telling him that he's supposed to represent the State of Texas, and he never actually physically shows up to do his job, you're doing a bad job. I don't even care what your politics are like you literally aren't you're not even mailing it in, you're just not going to work.

I would get fired. Like if I didn't go to work at my bank, or if you didn't go to work as the Director for IVP. Like you would get fired. And he’s like, well I hadn't thought about that. That's like, yeah, I mean, regardless of your politics.

Yeah, but I don't know. So do you feel like if you voted and I don't see your sticker, but I'm gonna assume that you did. Yeah. Do you feel like it counts or do you feel like it only counts in a way that you're able to now have a voice in the conversation?

Jonathan Walton 41:40

Well, let's break all that down. Right. So I think it's helpful to think personally relationally and systemically. So personally does my vote matter? I think as a follower of Jesus, I want to be intentional about the power that I yield and the power structures in this world. I want to be conscious of that. witness that I am bearing two people who are undocumented in my life. The people that are disabled, like pick the people who are downstream of oppression of violence, I want to say, Hey, I'm taking the power that I have to try and advocate for you in a way that I hope is honoring and empowering in a way that God intended.

So personally, and relationally? Yes, I think it matters. Systemically, I live in New York. The state that I live in leans heavily liberal. So the way that my vote matters, systemically, is dampered, by the population that I'm a part of. So personally and relationally I think my vote is significant because of what it means to me and what it means to my faith in the witness that I am pressing for in the world. Systemically; I'm not sure it matters because actually do not get to define that meaning in the system as it is set up. Particularly because of what you just said, I may vote for someone and not know their actual political agenda. And they're not actually interested in showing up to vote on the laws that I think are important. So they signed up to be my representative, but they're not actually representing my interests because they have their own interest.

Seth Price 43:22

Right. So, Jonathan, I'm curious. It's a two part question. And it may be the same answer. It may not be of the 12 (lies) that you wrote, which was the hardest one for you to come to grips with-or is there a 13th that you're like, oh, man, I can't put that in the book. I can't, or I don't feel comfortable putting that in? But I would like to know both of those answers.

Jonathan Walton 43:48

Yes. So all of them are hard they're all hard. I think the hardest one was…ah man.

Okay, this is not this is not one that's hard, but there were things that were hard and many of them and I'll try to name them because it's just too hard. So I do not have a great relationship with my dad. All of the significant interactions I've had with my father have been post my mom dying. So in the last three years. The chapters that I wrote about bravery and the association of bravery with violence, and trying to get into the mindset of my father in the 1950s and 60s, and his struggle for identity coupled with my own, like brief consideration of I want to fight sex trafficking and slavery. What if I went to the Marine Corps? What if I went the FBI?

Like, there's something about being seen as respected and being seen as brave and being seen in this way. And so I think that was really hard putting myself in his skin, trying to answer that just as son who doesn't have a close relationship with his father, but is trying to do what I believe Jesus has called me to do and honoring him in that way. I think writing the last chapter about my mom, and what did it mean for her to go to glory and get what she did not have on this side of heaven. It's also really difficult because I think when we talk about the hope that we have in Jesus, again, going back to before we don't talk about the hopelessness that exists in the world, and like Revelation 21 it's like, how powerful for me. Because if I think about the suffering My mom experience as a elementary school, middle school, kid going into a formally segregated school and entering into that, like, she lived in a world that was not designed for her.

But she served a God who said that he promised a place for her. But the only way for her to get to that place was to pass through this life. Right. And so thinking about that was also hard. And I think with thinking about we are all immigrants and we are all that we are a melting pot. It was difficult because I had to reconcile what it means to my daughter to read this as a woman who will carry the blood of colonists and the colonized and Native people and Chinese people and Korean people in her at one time. What does that look like? What she being invited into when she will speak Spanish and English and Chinese or Mandarin, right? Like, what is what does it mean for her?

Seth Price 47:08

Can your daughter speak all those now or is she learning all those now?

Jonathan Walton 47:12

Yes.

Seth Price 47:15

Okay, amazing.

Jonathan Walton 47:18

So but that's our context, right? Like, living in Jackson Heights and I want her to be able to communicate with everyone that looks like her and our family, obviously. Yeah, I would say she knows about, you know, more Chinese than I do and less Spanish than I do. And like, it's great to try to go back and forth with her.

Seth Price 47:40

If I'm not called to be a part of White America Folk Religion and I'm not called or if people of color are not called to be part of let's call it Korean American Folk Religion or Black American Folk Religion or Native…I don't really care what words you put in front of American. What are we called to be as the church like what is that look like?

Jonathan Walton 48:00

So I think again, there's a personal relational and systemic response. And systemically, I mean, if we could look like the bride of Christ intimate with him like redeemed and transformed, embody the faithful witness that happened in Acts 2 & 4. That's what I think we're actually called to where we don't live revolutionary lives, but we live subversive lives that are actually out of Romans 12 will be are able

to be not conformed to the world but be transformed by the renewing of our mind and then pursue the gifts that He has for us

promised in Galatians and Corinthians where we would hear from him and respond. Like he says, we will be able to test and know what his perfect will is like he says we could do that. Right, and then reflect that.

So systemically, I think we're actually called to be in intimate relationship with the Father and live out of that love the two greatest commandments. All while living out the great commission, like systemically all of us are called to be chosen to bear faithful witness. That's big picture. Relationally I think that looks like us entering into covenant relationship, a promise community with believers around us. Sometimes that might be like a house church, an underground church in China. Sometimes it might look like a church, in the suburbs in New York City, or whatever it is, but like, I think we are to be in committed relationship with believers and responding in ways together and individually that are transformative for those around us because of who Jesus is. I think personally, what we actually need to do and I talked about this at the end of the book, is look at the book of Acts, particularly Act 1-7, and take notes of what the disciples did. And then say, does my Christianity look like this? If it doesn't, how can it begin to look like this? When was the last time I baptized somebody? Now I know folks might get upset, right? But when was the last time I baptized somebody? When was the last time I cast demons out of somebody? When was the last time I prayed for healing for someone? When was the last time I testified at work to the goodness of God? When was the last time like, if we're not doing those things what are we doing? And so I like to say, if we ran our personal lives in our small groups, or beta groups, or life groups or cell groups, whatever you want to call them, through an Acts filter would we come out looking like follows this from the Scriptures? And if we're not, then we might want to reconsider the kind of trees that we are so that we might bear fruit.

Seth Price 50:56

Yeah, no, that's good. And I like that imagery of reconsider what kind of trees we are based on the fruit that is there. So, you begin lie 12 with a poem and so if you're willing, I know we talked about this a bit before. Yay if you're willing to roll through that so before we do this, where can people get the book engage with you interact with you on social media and or online or email, yeah, snail mail or whatever the mail?

Jonathan Walton 51:24

Well, the website is IVED.life. So that's like, all of our discipleship stuff. People are welcome to come to our programs in New York. People are welcome to grab live stream come to events, all that stuff. 12liesbook.com will be where all the book stuff is. And you can follow me on twitter @foreverfocused, but if you want to get the book by Christmas, which would be great, or if you're listening to this post Christmas, that's fine. They get it off a IV Press or on Amazon and also you can listen to audiobooks, I do perform poetry in the book quite a bit. You get that on Audible, all that good stuff.

Seth Price 52:08

Nice, fantastic

Jonathan Walton 52:19

Yeah Man.

Poem:

My skin speaks volumes my mouth may never say

sends messages my mind may never know

writes pages a pen in my palm never wrote

my skin…

brown but call black—

a whip cracks my mental back

my head aches from self-hate

that I want to go away

My skin says,

I may have struggled but my grandmother definitely did.

some white man, somewhere

had an illegitimate, illegal kid

My cousins passed with green eyes and light skin

but my granddaddy dark,

walked up to doors and couldn’t get in…

he wanted to buy land in Southern Virginia

but couldn’t because of my skin

For some it’s a source of pride

for me, I find it hard to stay unashamed

as I’m asked are you Ghanaian, Dominican, or Haitian?

and my response disrespects my ancestors when I say, I’m just

black.

Uttered from under a cloud of adversity, whispered from behind the shadow of struggle

I’m just black…

I want to say it with more something

but all I hear are Asian parents telling Asian daughters not to

date me

older generations fighting inclinations not to hate me

They say once you go black you never go back

but that’s only half the fact,

once you go black you never go back because some white men

won’t let you

I think black and I think pain

and I want so bad for my thoughts to change

but a world when I’m equal is just a dream

dreamt by a minority ruled by an indifferent majority

leaving me somewhere between radical Afrocentrism

or racial indifference with no ethnic identity at all…

Society won’t let me remember the Nat Turners or the Nat

King Coles

because I just might find my pride, grab my ax, hack out a path

to justice

all while singing we shall overcome….

I must recall the slave in me

so I can fight for those minds that aren’t yet free

free to hope, free to dream

Yes we can, is the song that I sing

and I’ll keep singing until the world is singing with me

They don’t want me to remember the Martins or the Malcolms

because minds like mine start movements

Bunche, Banneker, Carver, Powell, Douglas,

Marshall, Ali, Angelou, Kersey, Washington, Wheatley

Lewis, Walker, they are within me and I must remember…

Biko, Mandela, Aquino, Tubman, Truth—

I must remember the truth

that we must be measured by much more than our levels of

melanin

and our children won’t know our history unless we continue to

tell them

that the greatest race is the human race and we must flock

with runners like

Lincoln, Lennon, Locke, Gandhi, Tutu, Mead, living in on

world, in one great country.

because we too, sing America.

We are dark, light, black, yellow, brown and white

all fighting for the amnesty of the mind

They send us to eat in the kitchen

When company comes,

But we laugh,

And eat well,

And grow strong.

Tomorrow,

we’ll be at the table

When the company omes.

Nobody’ll dare

Say to us,

“Eat in the kitchen,”

Then.

Besides,

They’ll see how beautiful we are

And be ashamed—

we, too, are America.

Seth Price 55:04

Thank you so much, Jonathan for doing that I appreciate it.

Jonathan Walton 55:06

No problem.

Seth Price 55:44

I hope that you're challenged, both to do something both to raise your voice. And if you don't know what that voice is to find your voice, dig into the content that Jonathan I talked about, figure out which lies speaks to you in wrestle with it. And then once you understand at least the history behind what's happening, do something with it. But be careful, I find myself often coming from a position of I know more than someone on a specific topic. And somehow that makes me better than them. And to be honest, I'm not I never have been, nor was I ever. And so I think something that I'm going to wrestle with this year is talking with people, as opposed to talking at people and finding a shared common ground where we can learn together in love. And I know this book has helped me do that quite a bit. As I've come into conversation with people daily.

If you have not yet you need to go to patreon.com/CanISayThisAtChurch and support this show? big plans for this year, would love to take some time, bring some guests to me or either I go to guests, I'd love to do some live meetings and events with some of you. All of that requires funds. I can promise you right now every dollar that you donate in support of this show goes directly back to the show. I'm not buying Starbucks coffees with us and Matter of fact, you can actually support the show for less than a really bad cup of coffee. bucks coffee a few times a year. So I hope that you'll do that patreon.

Today's music was from artists, Royce. Lovett; I love his stuff. He's got some really good YouTube mixes if you go into the show notes and click down on that, and check some of those out they're really good addictive even in today's tracks, like every other episode will be featured on the Spotify playlist called Can I Say This At Church, which is a fantastic playlist if you haven't yet heard it, go back through it. It's it's fun for me to go back and hear how many memories get popped back up. So I'm grateful for each and every one of you listening. I'm grateful when you tell other people about the show. I'm extremely grateful for those of you that have supported the show in any way, shape or form. I look forward to talking with you next week. It's gonna be fun as it has been blessed everybody.

*poem used by permission from Pages 173-176 of Jonathan’s book: 12 Lies That Hold America Captive: and The Truth That Sets Us Free

The Parable of Christmas with John Dominic Crossan / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


JDC 0:00

Now I want to be very clear about this though, we are very good at missing the point. I'll just that Oh, wow, I'm so silly and the “I missed that”, the point that we're missing is the point we want to miss. So the debate, by all means that we usually don't do it about the Good Samaritan, but let's debate anything we want to debate, but not will you help your enemy if you find him in the ditch. Let's not get into that. Let's not even get into, in a Jewish context, could there be good Samaritans? Let's talk about something else. Let's talk about the two denarius for a couple of days rent. So it's not for me, with Luke and Matthew that I wish people would take it as a parable rather than history. I would be willing to say to somebody, “okay, take them both as history. Now you're happy, it happened exactly the way it said there however you put Matthew and Luke together, that's the way it happened”. Now, how do we get peace in there? Do we get if from Caesar the Augustus from whom Luke has just mentioned or do we get it from Jesus?

Seth Price 1:25

Hello, planet Earth. I'm Seth, your host. This is the Can I Say This At Church podcast; happy Christmas, everyone. Very, very Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays happy, whatever you want to use. I don't think the words matter because we're celebrating life and we're celebrating Christ intentionally. I’m so glad that we get to do this and that we make it a purposeful thing. Today I talked with John Dominic Crossan, who is brilliant. We talked about kind of the Christmas story and we talked about it as a parable like what the early church was trying to get at when they used it, why they maybe wrote it they did; maybe why Paul doesn't talk about the Christmas story all that much. And so John Dominic comes from the Christmas story in a way that a lot of us are not really engaging in and for months now, since recording this really not known how it sits with it, it's stuck with me and I think about it daily. And so I really hope that you'll get as much out of this conversation as I have and I've been challenged to grow and learn and pursue this more and it's leading me as of recording this now (the) first day of December. It's leading me to two places that I didn't know that I could go and it's stretching my faith in healthy ways. And so I really hope that you enjoy this conversation with John Dominic Crossan , here we go.

Seth Price 3:14

John Dominic Crossan, thank you so much for coming on to the Can I Say This At Church podcast!

JDC 3:18

Very glad to be with you, Seth.

Seth Price 3:20

For those in my circle of listenership there's a lot of Protestant-ish in my listenership and so I'm afraid that maybe a few people listening won't know a whole lot about you. So can you In brief, just kind of give me your theological upbringing and then kind of how that leads you into what you do now?

JDC 3:37

Well, I spent five years at a classical boarding school in Ireland, which meant that I learned Greek and Latin five years of peace before I ever read a New Testament or heard of a New Testament particularly. So I read the Roman classics, which is maybe a very good idea. I think that nobody should be allowed to read the New Testament before they read the Virgil’s Aeneid.

Seth Price 3:59

Really?

JDC 4:02

I'm serious because what you get then is a good dose, even though I didn't appreciate it, certainly Roman Imperial theology and then when you find out that people are saying that Jesus is Lord and Son of God and God incarnate and Savior ofthe world don't do well, he's weird names somebody invented, they say what he's taking on the Roman Emperor. He's just taken out his team, his big titles from the Roman emperor and given them to a Jewish peasant. Well, we're in a revolutionary state here. So you're not surprised when you find that Jesus gets himself executed. So when I got into the New Testament, I didn't have the scandal that so many of my colleagues seem to have with fundamentalism, taking it all literally. I was ready to take it seriously. And not literally at all. But I figured that Caesar was some of God. You didn't explain to Caesar that, you know, you're just a metaphor Caesar. So cool it. Yes, Your Imperial Highness Of course your son of God So, by the time I read the New Testament, I said, Okay, so now the challenge is, if you had a son or God around, what would he look like? Would he look like a Jesus or like a Caesar? And I would say Oh, yeah, they ain't the same type of guy. So it's as if you're having a Presidential debate between Caesar and Christ and what are the platforms be in each case? How would it be different? Is it just the one guy is a nicer, you know, personality? No, I think it has to do with programs and policies and things like that. So I was sort of ready for the New Testament when I got there to be honest with you.

Seth Price 5:37

Do you feel like and you said it earlier, many, myself included? Why do you think that we fell off the ledge of reading things so literal and so fundamental, fundamental, fundamental, fundamentalist, that's the word. Yeah, my vocabulary isn't up to par on the weekends, my brain checks out. Everybody needs a break.

Why do you think or when do you think we kind of just jumped off that ledge of, here's the way that we read it and if you don't read it this way, then you're not Christian.?

JDC 6:05

Exactly. It's the dark underbelly of the enlightenment. I mean, the Enlightenment was a magnificent achievement in terms of science, it took the dead hand of the church away from science and from history and opened it up; and that was right necessary good and there is no way I can to criticize that but for example, the word for knowledge in Latin was scientia. Knowledge, all knowledge, but all of a sudden in the Enlightenment, the only type of knowledge was “science” coming from scientia it so we narrowed, narrowed, narrowed it. And it was an understandable reaction science have been so denigrated and controlled by the church and, you know, Galileo and everything else. So yeah, you had to emancipate it. As in so many amounts of patience and liberation's, some weird stuff got liberated. I think we lost our sense of metaphor of the profundity of metaphor. I hear people say to me, oh, that's just a metaphor. And that metaphor creates reality. And then we also lost our sense of parable.

Well, even though Jesus himself when he wanted to say something really important about God or the kingdom of God, made up a story. And then we kind of scandalize some of the New Testament writers that might make up stories about Jesus, since he picked up very the bad habit from him of making up stories about God. So we lost our sense of metaphor, parable, symbol, oh, it was fine as decoration of course, nobody has problem with decorating stuff with metaphors.

But the idea that metaphor may create reality. And that if you have a bad metaphor, you might do them yourself. I mean, 1000 year old reich, is a metaphor. wasn't a good one. But like a good one in the beginning, yeah, it wasn't a livable metaphor. So metaphor is create reality. And if you live that metaphor, then it becomes real for you. So be very careful about your metaphors.

Seth Price 8:17

Well, and to be more clear about it, just be very careful with your words in general.

JDC 8:23

As well, at the moment, being very careful about what you say because retargeted violence leads very easily to physical violence.

Seth Price 8:30

Yeah, no, definitely. Well, this at recording this is the day after the shooting at the synagogue in Pennsylvania. And so yeah, it's easy enough to give lip service to violence, and then play coy, or insincere and surprised, when actual violence happens because of the way that we speak and treat others. But that is not why I brought you on, matter of fact, I would happy to bring you back on to talk about that.

That is one of my passions is talking about that but I also think find that in today's economy of words and in the economy of thought, and church, that people get really angry when you start talking about you know, if your words that you say or “this” and your actions or “this”, those two don't jive well together those two you're not. You're not being genuine to either yourself or to others. I don't think but. So what do you do now? So you said Ireland, and now you're in Florida? What's going on there?

JDC 9:28

Of course, I entered the Roman Catholic religious order a monastic order in Ireland. It was kind of a recruiting station for the American province. So I knew coming out of Ireland and in fact, that's what excited me excited me at 16 when I entered the order in 1950 as well, I thought this was the most thrilling life you could lead. It was nothing like giving up my life for Jesus or anything like that. I thought wow, Jesus has the best game in town! This sounds marvelous, a monk traveling the world.

So I came to this country then and my superiors like in the army decided, wait a minute, you've had five years of reconfigures, right oops, we want you to be a professor. I didn't come in to be a professor, I came in to be a monk and do what I was told. So of course, fine professor, whatever! So they sent me off to get my doctorate back to Ireland, and then send me for two years to Rome to specialize in exegesis and then two more years to Jerusalem to specialize in archaeology. And then was heavenly. I was all over the Middle East in the 60s all over Europe in the early 60s.

I saw the whole world as a monk as it were. So I had a marvelous education at a time when you could travel all over the Middle East by the way, in the early 60s. I was there from 1965 to 1967, I was in Jerusalem to the day before the war, and then I could say I left. The technical term is ran because we were told by our consulates, you're on your own if you stay beyond tomorrow, and that was Sunday morning.

So, basically, then after 19 years as a monk, I guess I finally decided that celibacy was vastly overrated. And I decided to leave the monastery but I loved being a scholar, they had made me a scholar. And that's what I wanted to spend my life (doing). So the excitement that was there, the very beginning remained as the excitement of scholarship, and especially focusing on the historical Jesus and early Christianity.

Seth Price 11:35

Well, getting getting to that. So you, you wrote a book with Marcus Borg years ago, and I can't remember the exact publication date about Christmas and the Advent story. And that's kind of what I like to center on, the early story of Jesus, and maybe how we should interpret it kind of how it stands in contrast, and the Scripture, and specifically and you alluded to it earlier, but I want to say this question. For the last but I'll go and give it to you now so you can collect your thoughts is, I genuinely wonder how we as Americans sit well with celebrating the birth of a man, that was God that literally up ended the system against imperialism as we sit, you and I both talking in one of the biggest Imperial nations in the history of the planet? But I will save that one towards the end. I'll restate it at the end.

JDC 12:26

Before you get off of it just remember that as a country we were founded on an act of superb hypocrisy, saying with our independence, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for everyone but we still had slavery.

I mean, I understand that the politics involved in getting it from England. But let's be very clear we started off with a very good experience in hypocrisy and that has become something we have to face as our national character now—now go back to where you want.

Seth Price 13:00

(laughter) We will. As a middle aged American, in the West, engage in the Christmas story because there's two different ones every year. I feel like it's a trite spectacle that we roll out for the Advent season. And so what am I missing when I begin to even engage in the text of the birth of Jesus?

JDC 13:22

Yeah, you're right. We trot it out, like the Christmas decorations. It's nice. And at the end of it, we either dumped them or put them back in the attic. Now, the way I approach that question is this.

First of all, what is Luke and Matthew up to? And why does Mark and John not have a good Christmas story too? I’m starting with the first century I'm trying to get into the minds of the four people who give us versions of the gospel. There's only one gospel that preaches Jesus, but it's according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. So we don’t have four Gospels, by the way, we have one Gospel in four versions.

All right, every gospel starts with what we’d call an overture that's like a preamble that to get you in there. Mark for example tells the story of John the Baptist and that's gonna get you ready for “wow John the Baptist was killed, was executed”. So you'll see already point this is not going to go well. Where John, obviously, he doesn't have a Christmas story in that sense but he has a Prologue. John has that magnificent hymn where he talks about in the beginning was the logos and the dream of God for the world became incarnate. Here is a problem now.

Two of them Matthew and Luke have prologues which are actually stories, their prologues though. The reason they are completely different, and anyone who reads them carefully, can see immediately the story in Luke is told completely from Mary's point of view. She has an annunciation and the angel comes to her; in Matthew’s point of view it's about the father it comes to the Father, everything is about Joseph.

So what’s going on why can't we get these two stories together Can't they get their acts together? No, because each one is a deliberate now my term is very careful, parabolic overture to their own gospel. It's like Luke knows what he's going to say, in fact, he's going to say it in a two volume gospel Luke and Acts. And when he's got it written that he says to himself, okay, why do I write as a prologue to this gospel? Because some poor guy is going to have to take this in a manuscript is written in wall to wall characters without any verses or chapters or anything. And upfront I'm going to tell him in two verses, here's what's going on.

It's like your life we write a book, the last thing we write in the book is prologue, which by the way is a marvelous feat is exactly what's going to happen in the book. We can tell them flawlessly what'll happen because it's written last of course, if you write your prologue first It's not going to work. So what you have in Luke 1 and 2 and what you have in Matthew 1 and 2, those chapters are specifically written parables and emphasizing parables. Of course, they're dealing with historical characters, Mary Joseph, Herod, these are really characters, but Matthew is thinking, and the reason I know what he’s thinking is because I'm reading very carefully. Then I read his first two chapters, and I see, okay, what you're doing here Matthew is giving me like, an overture as if we're looking at an opera. And the first little part is a medley of all the music we're going to hear. So we recognize that later.

So when you tell me, Matthew, that Jesus is King of the Jews, that the Magi come to Herod and say, we're looking for King of the Jews. When by the way, of course Herod's title, official title from Rome is King of the Jews. So what they've just done, whether they know it or not, is committed rhetorical treason, as it were. We're looking for somebody else. So the only next time I'm going to find in Matthew's Gospel, that term King of the Jews is on the cross above Jesus' head.

So when I read Matthew 1 and 2, I find it to be a superb, magnificent, couldn't do better if you thought about it, encapsulation of what's coming in Matthew. Now, turn it over to Luke, of course Luke has a different version of the gospel. Could he use Matthew’s upfront? No, no way. Now, where do they both agree, though?

And now we're getting close to your your final request, even though we're not there. Where do they both agree? Well, let me go back to what I just said about Matthew. It opens with an act of treason.

King of the Jews is a title that can only be conferred by Rome, it was given to Herod the Great was then given to Herod Arippa I. It was given to nobody else, and to assume it would have been treason. And that's probably what gets Jesus killed because he's talking about the kingdom of God. And any Roman would think, well, you must kind of think you're a king, though I think you're a joke as a king, but just to be safe. You have a public ritual of execution.

So then I look over at Luke, and I find he mentions Augustus, Caesar the Augustus. And right after that the angels come down and announce peace on earth, the birth of Jesus. Rome had announced peace on earth, as the program of Caesar, in fact, came with this birth, Pax Romana. So now if I look at these two and don't get hung up for the moment on their differences, or why they are there or any other reason; if I were reading this as a Roman sensor, I would get immediately. This is subversive stuff.

I don't know whether I have to take it very seriously or not but it's subversive. Maybe it's funny, maybe it's not funny. But I haven't even got into the third chapter of Matthew, or the third chapter of Luke and I've seen something in both of them, that they're announcing somebody called Jesus, whose birth is an alternative King of the Jews to bring peace on earth. But we appointed Herod to be king of the Jews to keep peace, at least in Israel. So while we get hung up on the differences, which many people can't explain though any scholars should be able to explain it to you that the differences are almost mandatory for their function. We ignore the similarity that each of them and therefore the Gospels that come after them, of course, are going to explain to us why it's not a great surprise that this person whose birth we are celebrating is going to end up, not just dead because most people do, but on a Roman cross. And immediately that tells me two very important things by the way, looking ahead now from the story, but it's already hinted there but there are armed rebellions against them. The Romans killed the leader and everyone could get their hands on, like the story of Barabbas. He's in jail as an armed rebel and so are his followers. Of course, that’s the way Rome acted! We are going to crucify you all in a nice row. When we're dealing with on unarmed rebellion, what we might call an activist, their civil law said, what do we do for somebody I'm quoting now, we'll create a tumult that stirss up the people. We crucify them. We burn them out where we send them to the beasts, the arena, or if they're high ranking, we just exil them to an island.

Seth Price 21:02

So we silence them, or we make an example of them, but we don't just flat out, shoot them in the head. We don't just kill them quickly and peacefully.

JDC 21:09

No we don’t kill them peacefully and don't round up their followers. So if I know I'm jumping ahead to the end of the story. But already the hints are there. It's like that classic thing they say, if you find a gun in the first act, somebody's going to use it. If I get this tension in these opening stories between the Roman authority and this Jewish peasant. And it's not some kind of a joke it's some kind of a claim of whose vision of the world should rule the world, then I know he's going to be dead by the end of the story.

And crucifixion was a public ritual of state terrorism whose function was to warn you don't do what this guy did or you end up like this guy has. That's why they bother with the expense and the time of sending a squad of soldiers and staying there to the man was dead and iron nails and a whole thing. They wouldn't just corral him in the barracks and toss his body over over the wall. This is a public ritual. If you read carefully in those opening stories, you already see a tension and it's not just the tension between you know, Jesus and Pilate or even Jesus and Caesar it’s what each one represents. It's their programs, their platforms, their visions.

Seth Price 23:25

If I'm thinking of the birth narratives in the two gospels as parabolic does that imply that there's no history involved there at all? Is there no historical leanings or adeptness in that as a first century Christian or Jew or Roman that I would have been able to go yeah that I remember people talking about that happening is it all parable?

JDC 23:46

Let me back off that very carefully because most people when they read what Marcus and I wrote in that book, come up with a long list of what didn't happen. Okay No, sir. No, this! No that! No the other.

Let me take as an example, the well known parable of the Good Samaritan. Now, of course, there were Samaritans, of course there were priests, of course were Levites, of course, there's a road from Jerusalem to Jericho and those are two cities that were there in the first century. And yes, it does go down a thousand feet. There were donkeys, by the way, and Denarius you could argue that every single thing in there, you might even said in the first century “Yeah and I stayed in that Inn down there”. You could make your argument and that this is all historic. But this story is not historic.

But any parable, to be a parable and not a fantasy must be realistic. It must be realistic. It may stretch the boundaries that push you a bit you might say, Well, I don't think a Samaritan will do that. But anyway. So what you have in Luke and Matthew, the author is not the least bit interested in giving you historical data. But of course, Bethlehem is a real place, but here's an example. Jesus of Nazareth is the name. We have to start this story in Bethlehem. Why? Is it because he was born there. I don't think so; it’s because the great and most famous person who came out of that claim was, of course, David.

So that's like you and I saying, suppose we said of a President “he thinks he was born in a log cabin!”. Now immediately, I would not take that as a piece of autobiographical or biographical data. He thinks he's Lincoln, born in the log cabin has been called iconic for him. And in the same born in Bethlehem sends the message from Matthew and for Luke is another thing they agree on, by the way, new improved David. David’s back. So whatever David did, this Jesus is going to do even better. Now. Big question. How do we get into Bethlehem? I mean he’s Jesus of Nazareth. Nobody says Jesus of Bethlehem. Each of them does it differently. Matthew simply takes it for granted. That's where they were living they're living in Bethlehem. And only afterwards when they came back from Egypt, they moved to Nazareth. Okay? That makes sense. Luke doesn't know that. Luke knows the beginning nursery. So he says they went there to be enrolled in the census that everyone knows about.

And of course, for 2000 years people have known wait a minute, there was no census around 4 BC the census was in 6 CE the wrong with it and take over the record. And you know, we go on this nosy ating debate, all of which is like, like arguing whether to denarii in the Good Samaritan parable that were enough for a couple of days rent. You want to scream. It's like if somebody said to Jesus, at the end of the parable, excuse me, Jesus, did that really happen? Jesus is going “oi vey here we go again another literalist.”

You know, like Jesus with the Good Samaritan parable, these two people have worked awfully hard to make a plausible story that makes the point they want. And there's a hard, hard, core to that point. When Luke says, peace on earth in the middle of the Pax Romana, he is saying you didn't do it. You didn't bring it. That is serious! So if somebody said to me, “the census didn’t take place.” I want to say get over it, would you? Would you get over it? You are reading a fiction, or a parable, but like any parable at the end of say, the Good Samaritan, Jesus says, Go and do likewise. Now suppose me I'm a literalist. Okay, go and do likewise. So I have the crews up and down the high road between Jerusalem and Jericho….

Seth Price 27:58

…and only that road…

JDC 27:59

and only that road; and only going down, I can't do it coming up, and I'm looking for somebody in the ditch. Now, that's absurd! You know, and I say everyone would laugh at it. But you're doing exactly the same thing when you look at Luke and Matthew and say, I really don't think that there was a census at the time of the birth of Jesus. So this whole stuff is rubbish.

Seth Price 28:21

And if you can view it as parable, then whether or not there was a sense, this isn't really the point. It doesn't, it's not a contention. It's just part of the story settlee down, you're missing. You're seeing all to use a bad metaphor you're using, you're seeing all the trees and you're missing the forest. So you're only seeing the forest and you're missing the tree that matters either way you're missing it.

JDC 28:45

Now I want to be very clear about this though. We are very good at missing the point. I'll just oh wow, I'm so silly in the I missed that. The point that we're missing is a point we want to miss So debate, by all means though we usually don't do it about the Good Samaritan. But let's debate anything we want to debate. But not with you help your enemy if you find him in the ditch, let's not get into that. It's not even get into in a Jewish context could there be good Samaritans? Let's talk about something else and talk about whether two denarius are enough for a couple of days rent. So it's not for me, with Luke and Matthew that I wish people would take it as a parable rather than history.

I would be willing to say to somebody, okay, take them both is history. Now you're happy it happened exactly the way it said there and however you put Matthew and Luke together, that's the way it happened. Now, what about whether Caesar is lord of the world and whether he's brought peace on earth by victory and violence, because the program of course of any Empire as you know, is we established a victory. After victory, we get peace.

Look at our word pacify we pacify our country. We know how to do it, you can get very quiet after you're dead. So empires ruled by victory. And this equates to peaceful, I think Jesus would have said, No, it's not peaceful. It's just a law and on to the next round. So what we do when we avoid or even get into the bait, like we're talking about power history, I would say to a fundamentalist, okay, I don't want to argue about this. You take it literally. I will take it metaphorically. Could we not debate that for the moment? Could we talk about meaning? How do we get peace in there? Do we have from Caesar the Augustus whom Luke has just mentioned or do we get from Jesus? And what's the difference in their programs? Don't just talk what Jesus was Lord and Caesar. Wasn't it that's both of the same title. So they're both making claims to a vision for the whole world. Now to respect Caesar and respect Jesus and Gracie, okay, I'm listening to two mega visions for how to run the world.

I see the differences. And now I have to decide which vision I'm going to accept and try to live by it. That's really the challenge, of course, of those two stories. And maybe in one sense, I would almost want to say, could we bracket the questions of historicity which are perfectly valid by the way, I'm quite ready to tell somebody…did the Magi come as it's told there? My own crack about that is no, because there are three men and they asked for directions in Jerusalem and men never do that. I mean they are following their star as you know, and then the seven Jerusalem to ask directions. What happens to the star? The reason of course they have the stuff in Jerusalem is because otherwise they can't ask the key verse. Where is he born? Who is king of the Jews, if they just keep finding the star and turn left the Jerusalem and go south to Bethlehem. But everything is lovely, but we’ve lost the point of the story.

Seth Price 32:22

So something I struggle with, and it's Kyle Roberts fault, a previous guest of the show, he he wrote a book about the virgin conception or the virgin birth or whatever, whatever verbs you want to use. And so I feel like as I was reading through your book that you wrote with Marcus and just thinking more about it, I feel like if it's parable that the authors are just conscripting in what they need to from the Old Testament to fulfill prophecy. Am I wrong in reading that or hearing that or how do I sit with that? If this parable, how am I fulfilling any form of prophecy of the coming Messiah?

JDC 33:01

Okay, let me look at both of them together for a moment and then look at Matthew, specifically, because this is another thing both of them agree on. Oh, by the way, the virginal conception, I'm using the term now, precisely virginal conceptions what we're talking about, people will say, virgin birth; but that's something else then virginal conception.

If I were in a court of law, and the judge said to me, now, I'm tired of all this bickering, I'm Scottish. I want to know yes or no Crossan, do you or do you not believe in the virginal conception of Jesus? I would say, Yes, Your Honor. And I'd be thinking, because I know what it means, your Honor, I bet you don't.

Here's what's going on. We are again, we are dealing with parable. But again, it's subversive parable. Because in the in the ancient world, if a person had achieved a great rank or status, and they were trying to tell this whole story doesn't seem to prosaic to say, “Well, he's his mother and his father had a little bit too much wine for dinner one evening and so sort of etc etc”, We want something magnificent. So, in the Jewish tradition, a revered person, Samuel, for example, would be born of aged and infertile parents, aged and infertile, which, by the way, would be quite a miracle because that's, that's checkable. You know, if you're both 99 and able to reproduced, yeah, maybe there hospital records as it were. That's a Jewish tradition, the Greco Roman tradition, of course, I think Greco Roman tradition is that if the great person like Augustus, or even wonder, then a god human woman had produced them by intercourse.

When the first Christians and there were Jewish Christians, of course, wanted to say our Jesus is better than anything in his own tradition before him or the Greco Roman tradition before him. They came up with something new. They came up with a virginal conception, not aged parents. They never say Joseph and Mary are 99 as it were. They don't say, a God had intercourse with Mary. And by the way, in Luke, the God at least has the courtesy to ask her permission. Most Greco Roman stories, the God just doesn't that's it. It's divine rape and is a bit strange.

So what they're trying to say by virginal conception is this person is extraordinary within both the Jewish, his own Jewish, and the Greco Roman tradition. Now I, as a Christian, accept that. That's why I'm Christian. If I thought Jesus was just a nice guy, I’d think he's a nice guy. So if you believe in the virginal conception, of course, I'm not talking for you, of course now, and talking metaphorically, or parabolically whichever term you want, but that is what they were saying. And by the way, I also leave these anciet people a fair amount of ignorance about the exact mechanics. Of course, you would involve the man, of course they knew it involved the woman. And of course, you would involve the emissions in both cases. But before we knew about the semen, the egg, and everything else, I think an ancient person would have no problem saying, actually, that Joseph and Mary are in the other couple, at intercourse, but the child born was the Son of God, because somehow God intervenes.

I wouldn't be as crude as intercourse or anything else like that because it was all very vague. How exactly the internal mechanics took place should I say? So I don't know if a person in the first century would have probably been saying Joseph was the father and he was Son of God.

Seth Price 36:58

Am I wrong, I feel like I'm I might not be and I remember at one time doing research on this. But if you trace Joseph's lineage back, that's how you get back to David. Mary, not so much. And so how do I call him Son of David, or descendant of David, without Joseph, but so little is said about Joseph in the story. But to me, that's the pivot to David, but I didn't write it so…

JDC 37:30

MMatthew, of course, is the one who gives the genealogy emphasizing back to David, and he gives it up front, you begin the story with David. In Luke, he only tells it much later and he takes him back to Adam. For Luke, and it's chapter three, I think it is, it's not the opening of his story as it were. So Matthew is the one of course who takes him back to David and you know, you can't quite have it both ways. If he's Son of David, biologically, like I said, though he could be I think, son of Joseph, that is son of David, biologically, but Son of God theologically. Because we're really not dealing with the biology of Mary. We're not really dealing with the biology of Mary, but the theology of Jesus.

Seth Price 38:22

Why does Paul, or anyone else for that matter, really, never really talk about the miraculousness of Jesus' birth? He mostly seems to focus on here's what Jesus and the Christ did. And so now, here's what we do. Was there less importance at that time than what we put on it now or why would he not? Because obviously, the guy was relatively smart. I mean, he argued for his life everywhere he went.

JDC 38:54

Well, let me put it this way. Paul is writing in the 50s. Matthew is Writing in the 80s. And you could be writing anytime from the 80s into the First century. Let me put it bluntly, nobody had invented the story. Because nobody, I mean, obviously, of course, the virginal conception was there, I think and the story about birth quotation marks “birth” at Bethlehem, but you simply could say, as Paul does say that in terms of David. So the story that we have in Luke 1 and 2, and Matthew 1 and 2 was only written when those gospels were, I would be ready to say were already written, and these were their preambles or overtures there. So in the same way that most books I've ever written, they put a prologue it’s the last thing written.

Seth Price 39:48

Yeah. Well, and for and for those listening, the prologue to each episode is usually two weeks after the episode so that I can marinate on it and figure out what exactly I need to say to buffer the conversation before people have it; so it’s really no different.

JDC 40:03

Yeah, if you if you were to say, supposed to say what I'm going to say now, it would be quite miraculous if you came up with an exact description of what I said, beforehand.

Seth Price 40:16

I'm very good like that. I feel like I might could do it. (laughter)

JDC 40:20

(laughter) You could claim prophetic powers and say, of course I can do it!

Seth Price 40:22

I have the prophetic power of editing, but I could I'm sure I could figure it out.

JDC 40:27

Exactly it’s prophetic power of editing. And then afterwards, if you wanted to came I wrote this before, and I was inspired to know what was coming. How can I disprove it?

Seth Price 40:39

Not to get off topic from that then so if I think about the two huge events and pivotal world changing events of Christmas and Easter, and if Paul really never gives much emphasis to Christmas, but he seems to really talk about the death, burial, resurrection, the implications of Easter-s Easter more important than Christmas?

JDC 41:04

Absolutely. Absolutely! Any Christian in the long history, who has a good theologian would have said absolutely.

And again, the fact that we have found no way, how should I put this, of trivializing, not of trivializing, because Easter bunnies and eggs and all of that is an incredible trivialization? We really haven't done that, because Christmas is still associated at least and the best sense would gift giving. So in the best sense of the word, yes, this in a way is the gift of Jesus gift to the world. So if you're going to associate gift giving even presents and all the rest of it, even the opposite of commercialization that happens a Christmas. There's a tenuous connection but I can't get much into easter eggs, round Easter bunnies, except we've given up. We just can't handle it.

Seth Price 42:10

Well, I'm glad that it hasn't been trivialized at all. So, getting back to that question that I started with that I've on purpose tried not to circle back around to. If I'm in America, and if and I asked Brian's Zhand this question, you know, I feel like most Americans feel like when we read Scripture, that we're Israel, that somehow we're the ones being oppressed, and we always miss the fact that no, we're probably Rome in this story, or we're Babylon in this story, or we're Pharaoh in this story. We are the ones beating down people and usurping privilege, we are the ones that through victory of aggression, we pacify the Native Americans in America; and we did it because we felt like it, because God called us to do this. And and getting back to what you said earlier, peace through victory. So, how do we, this year? I mean, by the time people are listening to this, it should come out around Christmas. So how do we change the way that we do Christmas now, to realize that we're celebrating the birth and arrival of the Christ of the universe that came to literally justify things not through aggression, and conquering, but through justice and through mercy? How do we reconnect it to where it should be, as opposed to some trite parade of happy feelings and really pretty songs and get back really to the theology of the purpose of the birth?

JDC 43:40

We have to do two things.

One we’ve been talking about here. We have to learn how to read what these people were saying. And then, and I'm quite willing to read a Biblical author and say I disagree. But I'm not willing to do is sit there saying something else. I think it's an honest answer. is here to say, I know what Jesus is saying. I don't think I can live up to it. Rather than just say, Oh, no, he just said, you know, pieces a nice idea. Give it a chance where it doesn't work what the heck, we can always have war. No, we have to take seriously. Why do you say the other thing I think? Let me back off for a second. I came to this country as a student in 1951. I didn't become a citizen of this country, until the year 2000. So yes, I've chosen to live in this country to be in this country and to be a citizen of this country. I could have stayed on a green card, I suppose.

I think we have to take an awful look at ourselves. I knew the British Empire, of course coming out of Ireland and all empires are a bit hypocritical. We always come to civilize you. We always come in your best interest. You are barbarians before and we're bringing you peace and order and law and civilization. I know that every empire that has ever been said that. We did something extraordinary as I mentioned earlier, In our Declaration of Independence, we made a theological statement about everyone, not just about us, we didn't simply say like the Irish Declaration of Independence, we have a right to be free, you know, England go home.

We didn't say that. If you compare the Irish declaration independence with the American start anything the American is that declaration that EVERYONE has a right to this all are created equal, all are endowed with their Creator. And we have it of course, in the Pledge of Allegiance, liberty and justice for all. So it's quintessentially American but we've never quite faced what I said before, that there's a profound, maybe a necessary maybe a politically expedient in that document, “please, let's not talk about slavery”. I am sitting here now all these years later, we just say let's realize it Maybe that was the cost of independence, which was a huge cost. And we have to face it, because otherwise that impregnates our national DNA with hypocrisy. And so it keeps coming up again and again and again, we're doing all of this just for the good of the world that we are the nicest people around. And very often we are, by the way, facing a disaster, we're good, really good.

We're not good though at facing that imperialism, the attempt to control others is never ever for their own back. It's never worked for their own benefit. So I think two things to face Christmas. We have to face honesty, the challenge that comes from those stories, and at least know that they are not saying something else. They're not saying have a good time at Christmas. They're saying peace on earth. That's what they're saying.

And they're saying it comes from heaven. I'm not taking that literally if it comes from heaven then it doesn’t come from armies and empires, so we have to look at that head on. And then we have to look at ourselves and maybe, you know, maybe by Christmas this year, please God, we may be ready to do it really seriously.

Seth Price 47:15

If I, we, were ready to do that, I don't even know what the planet would look like; our church we used some of the episodes of this show. And we talked about a little bit about gratitude and an economy of gratitude as freely given, you know, everyone's invited to the table and bring what you have. And that what you have is more than enough, and there will even be more than you need, if everybody just brings what they have. Talking about, you know, where Jesus feeds the multitudes. And you just brought what you had and how about this we didn't run out! This may be a bigger miracle that not specifically the number of people but just that there's an economy there and in God's economy, there's abundance. And we talked about how if we would just revert to giving away things that we could literally with overnight, if we a minute we could, everybody would have clean drinking water. If we actually managed to do it; if I could get people in Yemen to stop bickering about this or the other. We could overnight, help all of those people that are starving, and one of the worst famine that exists, but we can't because we continue to be Imperial. And we continue to want to fight over whatever we want to fight about. And we are so inherently good at that. I really do hope that by Christmas, we figured out a way to genuinely want to engage in active peace on earth, as opposed to just peace in Virginia, or peace in Florida, or peace in my county.

I really do hope that you're right. I hope that we're right.

Thank you so much for coming on. I hope to do it again sometime, possibly on on a different topic.

But thank you so much for your Sunday afternoon, I appreciate it.

JDC 48:52

It is more than a pleasure, thank you very much.

Seth Price 49:09

You know, I'm not really sure how to end, December and this show for the year. So I'll leave you with this. I really hope that you all have been challenged and as grown in your faith as much as I have this year, and it doesn't really matter what direction you grown in. I hope that you all have and will continue to have a blessed year as we close this one out and I cannot wait to see what's in store for next year. Be well, be blessed for the remainder of 2018.

Mysticism and Contemplation with Mike Morrell / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Mike 0:00

You know, sometimes mystics are improperly pigeonholed as being pie in the sky, impractical people. But for me mysticism is actually about loving what is, it's about embracing what is, the fullness of reality, which, at a bare minimum has to include my idea of God. Like if God isn't at bare minimum reality, then then God is not worthy of the name. And it's an art of union as opposed to a science of union because a science of Union would imply that we're not already one with this reality that we're not already a part of this reality. And frankly, I think that is the curse of the civilizational mind to see ourselves as separate.

Seth Price 1:06

Welcome back to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I'm still Seth, you're still you. I'm excited. December is about done. 2018 is about done. I had so much growth and met so many new people and talk to so many different people this year. It's been amazing. So thank you to every single one of you that support the show in any way, whether you've rated and reviewed on iTunes and if you haven't done that shame on you go do that. You know, you've wanted to for a while, it's like 26 characters, let's make it happen.

Specifically, though, to each and every single one of you that support the show financially on Patreon. It is a privilege and a blessing to engage with you. It is a privilege and a blessing to partner with you in this way. I'm continually humbled by your generosity, and I'm so encouraged by it. Can't wait to see what 2019 brings. If you've not yet done that, please just visit the website at Can I Say This At Church.com there's a support the show button in the top right? Or patreon.com/CanISayThisAtChurch and do that consider in any way shape or form whatever you're comfortable with. support the show, I'd love to throw you some things that other people don't hear. Every once in a while get to see what I look like, which is it's dangerous, but it is what it is.

This week's episode was both one of the hardest ones that I've ever done. And it's also some of the most fun I've had in a while in a conversation. I mean, Mike Morrell was the guest this week, as you've seen if you downloaded the episode, and we talked about the future of the church, we talked about creation, we talked about mysticism, we talked about Mythicism, the Enneagram, a little bit of Donald Trump, but don't let that scare you. But we we talked about so many things, and overarching Lee, it's about intention with the way that we treat each other relationally and what That relationship then means for how I interact with God. And then that's then going to inform how I treat you and others around you and me, intentionally, and it's cyclical and the work is hard, and it's worth it.

Before we dive in, one of my favorite quotes is from Karl Rahner, who basically said,

the Christian of the future will be a mystic or won't exist at all.

I find there's so much truth in that. And I also find it disconcerting and uncomfortable, and I think that's the point. And so here it is. Roll the tape on the conversation with Mike Morrell.

Seth Price 4:00

Mike Morrell, welcome to the Can I Say This At Church podcast! I know we've tried to do this often on for months and because you're busy and because I'm busy, it's been unable to happen until now. And so I'm thankful for your time today and welcome to the show.

Mike 4:14

Thank you, Seth. Yeah, I'm glad to be here. We are some busy humans, but here we are.

Seth Price 4:18

I think all humans are busy. That's probably our problem. We should learn to let go of one thing and not replace it with something else. But that's not why…that's not why I brought you on for those listening. I'm sure they've seen your name either on a book with Richard Rohr, or your name gets thrown around and quoted a lot I've seen in at least the groups that I'm in on Facebook and or Twitter. But can you tell those unfamiliar with you kind of a little bit about yourself, kind of your upbringing and then what impacted your life to get you where you're at now in the way that you do you?

Mike 4:48

Sure, yeah.

So I am a writer, blogger, and I love working with authors and publishers and events to create really beautiful experiences for folks in writing that moves the needle forward in terms of living a wholehearted, open-handed life with God and each other. It's because I suck at having a day job. I've kind of made that up for most of my adult life. And it seeming to work so far.

My upbringing, I grew up in the bible belt in Georgia, suburban metro Atlanta area, Georgia, and was kind of a denominational mutt. I came to faith in a Southern Baptist context and then we'll add a born again experience when I was four years old, you know, said that sinners prayer and repented from my life of debauchery up to that point.

Seth Price 5:47

Not to cut you off? What does that look like from zero to four? What does debauchery look like for a three year and 11 month (old) person?

Mike 5:55

I was being somewhat tongue in cheek.

Seth Price 5:57

Oh yes, I’m aware.

Mike 5:59

Im sure I felt guilty about something But no, it was actually, it was a conscious choice. I still remember it and it seemed to have an impact on me. You know, my parents were sort of cultural Christians, Catholic and Southern Baptists respectively, and they were from further up north. My dad was from Appalachian West Virginia, my mom from Connecticut. And so coming to the south moving to Georgia, they had this inevitable confrontation with faith both through television at the time, Pat Robertson-700 Club, as well as through friends I think and so, you know, started bringing me to church and they have their own, born again, experiences, you know, they were seekers in the early 80s.

And by the late 80s, we we turned up the dial a little bit, got involved with Pentecostal folks. I had a baptism in the Holy Spirit experience, which, if your listeners don't know what that means, there are some things branches of Christianity that believe that not only do you enter into a sort of salvific covenant through belief and or baptism in water, but there's this sort of extra dose of divinity that you can get by just being more receptive, more open to the power of God to come inside of you and work on you.

And for my parents that looked like having a 30 plus year smoking addiction, and wanting deliverance from that, and they had this baptism in the Holy Spirit experience at our kitchen table with a couple of friends who are praying with them, and they quit smoking cold turkey that day and never smoked again. It was really powerful for them.

And I saw that and I was moved by that and had my own experience with speaking in tongues, sort of ecstatic speech, which became a reliable feature within a few years. You know, some people in the Pentecostal world, you get kind of one and done with your baptism experience and the spirit, but others can do it on the regular. And that was a value in the churches that we were in. And yeah, I don't know that was a really experiential time for me and my faith, also very volatile in certain ways. And there were different church scandals and things of that nature.

And my parents left that movement after about, oh, I don't know, five, six years. And then I went to the Presbyterian Church, which is like the exact opposite, conservative Presbyterian, PCA environment, which I appreciated at the time for encouraging more of a life of the mind than the Pentecostal church did. You know it was okay to read books was also okay to drink alcohol. Maybe not quite okay as a teenager but you know, I still did.

Seth Price 8:56

(laughs)

I’m pretty sure it’s legal in your house with your parents though. So you're good.

Mike 8:59

Yeah. It's legal in my house with my parents but maybe not legal in the pastor's house with my best friend's parents. I don't know.

Seth Price 9:08

They were parents and it's still a house. So we’ll allow it.

Mike 9:11

That’s true; yeah, we'll go with that. We are past the statute of limitations anyway. But, yeah, I kind of grew up in this composted environment, the Bible Belt, where everyone took faith really seriously. You know, Baptists were really big on evangelism and Pentecostals were really big on living in the power of the Spirit. Presbyterians were really big on theology and their own particular ideas of you know, predestination, etc. and it had an interesting impact on me. On the one hand, I really appreciated the various distinctives you know, much like if you were shopping for wine or cars, you could be like, Oh, this is an interesting feature!

On the other hand, the sort of odious sectarianism really got to me. This feeling that these folks have the corner market and actually everyone else was, if not, you know, condemned to hell, certainly highly mistaken and will have to, you know, face a serious reckoning with the Almighty, sooner or later. And I don't know that had a practical effect of relativizing me, to a certain extent, at a relatively young age by the time you know, I was in high senior in high school. Whereas all these movements taught absolute truth, the idea of absolute truth and that they held the corner market on it, I saw that there were multiple competing truth claims, and rather than choosing between one of them, I sort of saw them all as being partially correct and partially incorrect.

And so, entering into college, which was, you know, the advent of the Internet, at least in popular use, like late 90s. I was impacted by two movements in my faith formation. One was the house church movement, the sort of decentralized and in my case egalitarian, open, participatory, network of community based neighborhood based house churches that changed how I saw ecclesiology and a lot of ways and also introduced me to the mystics.

This was a very eclectic stream that really enjoyed Brother Lawrence, Jean Dion, François Fénelon and Michael Molina in particular. And also with the coalescence of the internet the very early birth pangs of what became known as the emerging church conversation.

And if I could maybe add a third stream in there. It was like the new monasticism these other folks who were living in community and creating vows. And they had more of an outward focus than our inwardly focused house church movement, or the focus on being a witness-being a witness for justice and equality in neighborhoods that were quote at the margins of empire as they put it. And also 9/11 happened, you know, a few years, a few short years later, and with 9/11 happening that really led to me having a reckoning in my politics. Which before that were by default, conservative Republican. And really, by the time I was in high school republicans weren't conservative enough for me. So I hung out with John Birch Society types and libertarians. And I found them to be more intellectually satisfying than the sort of wishy washy Republicans.

And so, but 9/11 happens and, you know, there's all this saber rattling about going to war with Iraq, and I knew from what I read, Iraq didn't really have anything to do with 9/11. And so seeing the sort of reflexive, patriotic, saber rattling was disturbing to me. And that was when I discovered anabaptists, Christian anarchists, with like, Jesus radicals com which is still around. And there was this group of Vineyard pastors that created this statement called Kingdom Now 95 theses against the nationalist idolatry of the United States.

Seth Price 13:10

I've not read that how well does it hold up, if you remember any of the thesis…because some things were written really to that time?

Mike 13:16

Yeah, it's been a while since I've looked at it. The website was Kingdomnow.org, which is not around anymore, but if you went on archive.org I'm sure you’d pull it up. Christian Smith, who runs the Englewood Review of Books now he was one of the main writers of that. I'm imagining it probably feels a lot like clueless, white, pacifism these days if I were to read elements of it, and at the same time, it was perfect for where I was at because it had chapter and verse references for every one of the theses about “hey we are to have allegiance to a king who knows no you no national boundary we are a people have ever reach tribe tongue in nation. You know if we're if we were to turn the other cheek and love our enemies, why are we going to war? And yeah, you know I discovered probably Stanley Hauerwas at that time John Howard Yoder, you know, all the anabaptist crew.

So that was a three fold cord of I'd say house church, Emergent Church and then new monasticism/Anabaptism all explored within the relative freedom of college. And that really began to evolve my faith.

Seth Price 14:32

So that's a lot of buckets. So you've gone from ultra conservative to leaning more conservative politically, to then blowing everything up leaning into mysticism and a few other things. So what do you call yourself today?

Like if I said, alright, Mike, what kind of Christian are you, is Christian the right term? What 30 second elevator pitch, what are you religiously?

Mike 14:57

Sure Christian is totally the right term. I don't like to get to precious about terminology, you know, yeah, labels suck, and we use them as a certainly necessary shorthand. So if I had 30 seconds in an elevator, I would probably say that I'm a friend of God and an aspiring follower of Jesus. If people ask me what kind of Christian I am? I would say, I'm a composted Christian, that there are all these elements in my life of Christianity and rather than the Protestant Reformation idea of scorched earth, starting from scratch, I see all these elements, even the ones that are decaying as nourishing the soil of my life. But even if they're rotting, they actually have something valuable to offer me and it would be disingenuous of me to disown any part of my past.

Seth Price 15:43

Last question about your past and then I’d like to move into hopefully what the future looks like for well, I think honestly for the faith if there's still going to be one for my kids, but yeah, we'll get there-so you have kids like mine, and so I find often and some of my changes in my viewpoints on religion and politics and faith and posture towards those that have less privileged than I do. And even recognizing that that's the thing, as opposed to feeling like I'm losing rights because other people are gaining them. When I didn't really lose anything, they just got “ some” which is, which is progress. So how do you explain God to your kids? And I say this not knowing exactly how old your kids are. And so if they're one, this is a really easy answer, you probably don't. But how do you navigate questions about God with your background in lens with your children?

Mike 16:39

Yeah, yeah, it's a great question. So you know, I have two girls, one is four and one is 11. And our four year old has special needs. She has Downs Syndrome, so that definitely, you know impacts every aspect of our parenting and relating to her with our oldest she has always been super inquisitive. And I don't know that I've ever sat down and had an ontological chat about God.

But she has been raised in in faith communities. We relocated from the Atlanta area to Raleigh, North Carolina in the mid 2000s, with about a dozen of our friends that went to college together to start this house church community. She was born in that context, though I doubt she remembers it, because within a couple of years, you know, we sadly imploded due to a variety of internal and external drama.

But we found another faith community that was fairly similar in certain ways in Raleigh, called Trinity's Place it was this church experiment, run by a couple of ministers from a tiny progressive denomination called the Alliance of Baptists. The Alliance of Baptists are our contemplative. They have a little bit of a Celtic flair. They're still undeniably Baptists and even Anabaptist and we met in a circle. We had We celebrated communion every week we had different folks share. And so she grew up with that in her earlier years that was also an experiment that passed away more with a whimper than a bang. It wasn't super dramatic, but the main folks who were catalyzing it moved out of the area for different reasons.

And we've continued to find faith communities that we're matching with our values and our momentum. And we can go into more of that later when we talk about possible futures, preferable futures, of Church and Christianity. But as I say, you know, she always had that sort of social public faith formation element. And then we try to practice centering prayer together. There's a little book actually, that outlines centering prayer, which if you're listening, so now is a streamlined form of the ancient contemplative tradition within Christianity. It's a a 20 minute practice, at least for adults. That The 20 minute practice where you, you sit with a simple intention to be with yourself just as you are and to be with God just as God is. And you hold a sacred word that symbolizes your intention to simply be there.

And whenever you catch your mind going off and drifting off to something, you use that word, not as a mantra, but as a kind of release a kind of internal muscle of of letting go and just relaxing back into that awareness of God. And so it's a practice that I've aspired to and have failed at and I've picked up again for about 20 years now. And it’s one that I taught, our oldest daughter, the kids version is like, seven minutes. So you know, she had that perspective that practice and being a reader, being a voracious reader and being my daughter, she loves comic books. So I've gotten her various comic book adaptations of the Bible.

Seth Price 20:04

I didn’t know those were a thing.

Mike 20:05

Oh, gosh, there's so many different ones and none of them are like progressive per se. They're all from various lenses of various, you know, creators that I just love to read them all. And then we talk about them and she'll notice that like, Oh, you know in this comic Bible, the story goes this way, this comic Bible, the story goes that way…and I'll be like, “Yeah, why do you suppose that is?” And so we get to have conversations that not unlike the actual Bible, different authors have different experiences and perspectives, they weave into the text. And so she's very literate with the Bible, and you know, now has her own grown up Bible. I don't know how much of it she's cracked. But she does have it. And, you know, when I worked on the book with with Richard, The Divine Dance, of course, she had questions about what a trinity was at. And so we did that. Probably The most ontological conversation about God that we we've had. And I said, “Well, you know, we we believe in a God who is the generator and Sustainer of life and, and we share that belief with with Jewish people and with Muslim people. And at the same time, we Christians have this interesting experience that's kind of unique, where we experienced this man, Jesus of Nazareth, as somehow also being divine. But we only believe in one God and so how can how can Jesus be divine also, and who is this Holy Spirit who, you know, Jesus says, He sends us this comforter is the Sustainer is this helper”. And I said, as Christians, you know, began to think about all of that for a few hundred years and decide that that we still wanted to be a part of the One God club.

And at the same time, we saw divinity present in Jesus and we took seriously Jesus promise of God dwelling inside of us. And we call that the Trinity. And it's God that is one but the Oneness is in relationship, that there's this relationship that we call Father, Son, and Spirit. And we also can experience oneness and relationship with each other as we move forward and in the Shalom and the goodness of what God's doing on Earth.

Seth Price 22:21

So I only wrote two questions on the Trinity because I'd be a fool to not ask you about the trinity considering you worked on that text with Richard; if I was to actually practice what I say that Christians believe in the Trinity, what would be different about the way that we do church and relationships now? Because I hear you say it's relational?

Mike 22:37

Yes.

Seth Price 22:38

But I know we never really talk about the Holy Spirit, except for that one week at Pentecost, that we do at that one time and all of the songs say fire and spirit in them and then we won't do them again for an entire year. And so if I was to actually live and breathe what Trinity should look like, how should that affect the way that I'm relationally posturing myself to anything?

Mike 23:00

Well, first, I’ve got to say you obviously didn't grow up Pentecostal because then you would have had Holy Spirit 24-7, and maybe there's this dude named Jesus has something to do with bringing the spirit. (laughter)

Seth Price 23:11

I grew up very southern baptist. And then after one of those Baptist conferences where everybody wanted to argue, for the 2800th time, I then went to an independent regular Baptist. Now I'm with co-operative Baptist. I can't get out of the Baptist camp, but I really love the church that I'm at now. So I'm not mad about it.

Mike 23:32

Did you find that the regular Baptist had better fiber intake?

Seth Price 23:37

Well, it's more consistent fiber. I don't know that it's better but it's definitely it's something in the way that we did communion. It's just better consistency. Definitely not gluten free but better overall bread.

Mike 23:52

Good. That’s helpful (laughter from both.)

Well, so, so yeah, I mean, you know, some folks have talked about how different denominations or historical periods generally emphasise one person of the Trinity over another. And I think it's interesting to look at that we gravitate maybe towards certain depiction or lens of God more than others. But the idea of, what theologians would technically call the social Trinity, this sort of circle dance of the, you know interrelate lationship and the cooperation of the members of the Trinity both within themselves and generating reality. That's something that Christians hardly ever think about barely in theology and almost never in the pulpit. And that's why I think my friend Paul Young's novel, The Shack did so well. So I mean, that was when I really first started thinking about the Trinity. I was a part of the launch team for The Shack back when it was a small independently published venture, I guess, over a decade ago now. And, you know, it's a very narrative depiction of this Papa who loves his, you know, son, his slash her son, so much and this sort of flitting about energetic, but of benevolent spirit, and how much they all adore each other and that within that relationship, all of these paradoxes are eased including the paradoxes of senseless death and pain.

And I think that that novel really hit a chord with Christians and non Christians alike because suddenly, it was an alternative image of God. It was distinct from the sort of, you know, Zeus, a distanced stern Zeus of the the Calvinists of the Puritans, or the sort of Santa Claus slot machine of popular TV preachers and prosperity preachers. And of course, you know, different than the super remote deist deity of, you know, maybe unitarianism or Transcendentalism.

So you have like all these American Gods not to confuse it with the excellent Neil Gaiman novel and show, that aren't working for a lot of people these days. And The Shack and I think the divine dance in our own small way, or showing that, hey, this, this dusty concept of the social Trinity can actually be quite juicy, it can actually transform everything.

And what it transforms for me is to know that, as I sit here with you, you're not disconnected from me. That our stories are intimately tied to each other, and that you bear the imago dei, the image of God. That the image of God, in fact, can't fully be properly buried by individuals, but it takes a community of people to truly generate the image of God. And then to me that changes everything.

Seth Price 26:52

Well I have two questions on that. The first one is when you say Zeusian God, all I can picture in my head is the Walt Disney Zeus Hercules movie of him just throwing bolts at people or spoiler alert, improperly impregnating humanity to make Hercules with no consent. But it's specifically about the imago dei are you saying that I can't, as an individual, bear the full image of God outside of relationship, is that what you're saying? Or that my image bearing of God has made better through relationships?

Mike 27:27

I mean, if I had to choose between the two options I would probably veer toward the latter, you know, as a pantheist. I think there's something of divinity in every rock and you know, shards of glass and everything that exists. But I do think that that unique way that we bear the imago dei is social. I mean, if you even think of Genesis where the idea makes its debut. It's, you know, male and female, God created them in the image of God created them it was it's a plurality. It's not a solo sport.

And I think that that's actually how a lot of theologians come to the Trinity through a sort of internal logic, which is that if we attest as Christians that God is love, well, for God to be love, there needs to at the very minimum, be a lover and a beloved. And for God to be love in a way that isn't simply self-reinforcing in the way that narcissistic coupling can often happen, that God being a three comes in really handy metaphysically.

So I would say that definitely, it really ups the game of how are we unique image bearers in a way that could be different. And at the same time, I want to maintain creaturely humility, because I think that sometimes various animal kingdoms can model interdependence a lot better than we can.

Seth Price 28:55

Getting back to that metaphor of Zeus. So one of the things I wanted to talk with you about was mysticism. But before I do oftentimes when I say mysticism what people hear me wanting to talk about is…

Mike 29:10

Mythicism?

Seth Price 29:13

That's the one. I can't say it.

Mike 29:14

Do they? You have some really intelligent friends that could you know come up with that mishearing of a word.

Seth Price 29:18

I guess…so what is the big distinction between Zeusian and type God, which is a myth, you know, and oftentimes when I start talking about any mysticism, which is what I find myself, gravitating toward, often while I pray, or while I read or while I think or while I look at the mountains that I live next to is something much more grander than text on a page for me, but I've never been able to distinctly be able to say, “Well, here's where you can draw the line between mythisicm and mysticism”.

Mike 29:51

Wow, I've never even heard people wanting to conflate those two. So let me…let me sit with this for a second. What do people mean when they're thinking about mysticism?

Seth Price 30:02

I think they mean that I'm, for one, they usually mean I'm taking a low view of Scripture and elevating something that isn't, quote unquote, in the Bible to status of authority, whether or not it was written by someone. And that then I'm allowing outside influences that are myth to influence the way that I see God, I think is what they usually are trying to tell me.

Mike 30:23

Wow. So it's like, a willful mishearing of a phrase in a way that hurls invectives into your paraidgm.

Seth Price 30:30

Yeah. And I get it often enough, but usually on Facebook, and so I'm either typing something wrong, or I do have smart friends, and it's probably a little bit of both. It's probably more my fault than anything. But if it was a question I wanted to ask you.

Mike 30:46

Yeah, well, I mean, I think that first of all that kind of goes into this popular misconception that myth means lie. And I get that that's how we often use it in our current English language like oh, that's not true. That's just a myth.

But I think That like myth in the Joseph Campbell sense of the term, are the stories that actually tell really deep truths, whether they've really factually happened or not. And so, you know, clearly the stories of Zeus told truths about, Greek and Roman society, these various Pantheon, that were true about how their culture, their values, how they operated.

And in that sense of the term, I actually don't mind saying that a lot of even
Scripture, Christian scripture is myth. You know, clearly like letters between people like Paul writing the folks and saying, oh, by the way, don't forget to pick up my coat in such and such a town. It's not quite intended to be mythic literature. But there are other stories, especially I'd say the first you know, dozen or so chapters of Genesis and arguably Job, that are more parabolic, that are intended by their original hearers to be these epic stories that tell deep truths about who we are and who we claim to be. I've long since made peace with that, understanding that I don't have to have a completely 100% sort of out, “oh, this really happened”, and this is a myth, quote unquote, also because you know, people can enact things in real life that also have mythic significance. So there's that too.

Like sometimes, you know, some of my favorite contemporary New Testament scholars will be like, Well, you know, the meaning of this story of Jesus miracle is x, y, and z. And I'm like, oh, man, right on. I totally agree with that meaning, and as a Pentecostal, I saw weird stuff happen I can't discount all of. So it's possible for me that something weird really does happen and that it has this sort of mythic significance.

Seth Price 32:36

Yeah.

Mike 32:47

So those are my thoughts about about myth. Now, mysticism. You know, my favorite definition of mysticism comes from Evelyn Underhill. She was an early 20th century Anglican, spiritual writer and she talked about

mysticism was the art of union with reality.

And I really liked that because it places the emphasis in two places that I really like, which is art and reality. That, you know, sometimes mystics are improperly pigeonholed as being pie in the sky, impractical people. But for me mysticism is actually about loving what is. It's about embracing what is the fullness of reality, which at a bare minimum has to include my idea of God. Like if God isn't at bare minimum reality, then God is not worthy of the name. And it's an art of union as opposed to a science of union because a science of union would imply that we're not already one with this reality that we're not already a part of this reality.

And frankly, I think that is the curse of the civilizational mind. To see ourselves as separate.

Actually, I'm working on co-launching a nonprofit with a good friend of mine right now called Rewilder. And part of the core of it is our anthropological reading of Scripture, where we see the advent of agriculture and the advent of this separation mindset as being one of the same. And it opens in the Fertile Crescent where our monotheistic traditions emerge. It opens with the story of transitioning from a tree of life of wholeness of unity, to a tree of knowledge of good and evil, which is duality and discrimination. It opens with a garden, but then we're cast out of it. I really think that's what we experienced as a species.

We developed what evolutionary psychologists call self reflexive consciousness, where suddenly I'm a very distinctive, me, you're very distinctive, you and it gives the gift of a certain rich inner subjectivity and discrimination, but the curse is I no longer feel like we are brothers. I no longer feel one with my band of people, I no longer feel one with my environment, or myself as an embodied creature who has a bedrock place within this creaturely universe. I no longer feel intimately connected to Spirit or Divinity as I understand it, and when I don't feel connected when I'm cast out from that garden of interconnection, I'm capable of all kinds of atrocities, not because I'm evil, but because I'm lonely.

Seth Price 36:00

I want more of that, I don't even know where to read more of that but I want more of that. But what I'm hearing you say is the myth of Genesis is anthropologically related back to us being able to be self sustaining knowledge. And that made us inherently tribal. And not only tribal from each other, but tribal from the divine?

Mike 36:20

Oh, interesting that you're using the word tribe in that way. And I get that that's actually how a lot of people use it these days that tribal inherently means like cliquish, divisive, etc. I would actually love us to see a return of tribal as we were tribal for hundreds of thousands of years of our existence. As I continue to dive in anthropological literature, what I'm seeing is that when we were immediate/return foragers, what's more popularly known as being hunter gatherers, we basically lived in functional egalitarianism and did not have organized warfare, because our population was at a relatively low level for a few hundred thousand years. Whenever two tribes would start to kind of bump up against each other and food started to get a little scarce, it was way less resources to simply move in opposite directions than to fight over property. Because the Earth bore so much abundance during this time, there was a certain, you know, fertility by enlarge to the earth.

So again, it wasn't that these folks were like saints, and they weren’t terrible. It's about the sort of environmental triggers that signal certain things internally. So I think we actually became less tribal, and more civilizational when we began to till land, suddenly, we had the question of whose land is it? That was a question that never occurred to humans before the advent of agriculture about 6000-8000 years ago, and so suddenly, I had to know if this land was mine. And I needed to know who I was passing it along to. So my children had to become my property now as opposed to being raised in a village, my women had to become my property now. And you see this echoed in the language of even the 10 commandments.

I see it as a sort of loving divine condescension trying to limit the damages of agriculture. Because women are listed in a list of property, it's like don't covet your neighbor's oxen or their tools or their wife. It's like, wow, what is this? And, you know, on the one hand, I feel like we have far too many fundamentalists today that want to preserve that, you know, ethos as limit as property. And you might have more, you know, skeptic and atheist type saying, see, this proves that religion codifies women as property.

I think there's a third alternative, which is that culture in general, had this massive shift. What anthropologists Jared Diamond calls

one of the worst ecological and social disasters of the human species

and that religion was attempting to catch up with that religion suddenly recognize that there was a breach. That there was this fourfold alien from God, self, other, and world, and all healthy religion, all Healthy Spirituality is attempting to bridge that gap. It's attempting to provide us with the practices, the beliefs and the community forms that can reunite what has been lost. And the struggle is that we can't solve a problem at the level that has created it. And so you know, this era, the last 6000-8000 years, brought with it some alienation mindsets. And so even with the best of intentions religions and spiritualities often increase shame increase in grouping and infighting increased that unhealthy form of tribalism that you're naming.

And it's a real act of discernment to figure out what are the you know, the stories the community forms, the practices that can help; and one of the reasons I'm still a Christian is because I believe that Jesus of Nazareth embodied a lot of the ethos of immediate return foragers in his teachings of taking no thought for tomorrow—of considering the lilies of breaking bread as a sign of this sort of koinonia, this fellowship of the kingdom of God.

I think he was bringing this sort of hunter gatherer, life way, in the midst of his empire and agrarian context of his time, and people didn't understand it. And if we're honest, we don't even fully understand it today. But I think the ecology is necessitating us understanding it is necessitating us getting it, because we've had an 8000 year long adolescence, and we are breaking our stuff, like any adolescent does, but our stuff happens to be the planet and the planets not gonna last for much longer unless we grow up.

Seth Price 40:39

What I'm hearing you say is there's two alternatives. There's either a Thanos type snap, and we go back to where we were prior religion, or maybe we actually follow Jesus and practice what Christianity preaches, as opposed to what Christians preach.

Mike 40:55

Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely.

And you know, it's again, with a compost metaphor, it's not like anyone has ever gotten 100% right, or 100%. Wrong, I think we can look at the history of Christianity and find the contemplatives find the mistakes that we're seeking to draw closer to God, we can also find the folks who sought to honor the Earth in more holistic ways. Francis of Assisi and Claire being very picturesque examples of this greater harmony with nature. And so I think that our own eschatology holds a key in the idea and the image of the New Jerusalem, descending from heaven to Earth.

Like on the one hand, it's a city and it's interesting because scripture has almost nothing positive to say about cities, you know, from the earliest mentions in Babel they're often places of violence and confusion. But yet, the closing image in our narrative is not returning to a garden it is a city. But if we look closer, it's actually a garden city, because it contains the elements of Eden…

Seth Price 41:57

Yes a river flows out of it…

Mike 42:00

Yes, trees of life lining the side. Rivers of life, gold, silver, precious stones. It's like a laundry list of Genesis one and two, making its way into Revelation 21 and 22. And how I'm choosing to interpret that is that it's a symbol of permaculture. It's a symbol of this movement that's happened for the last 50 or so years, globally, where humans are like, wow, we do have this sort of, I think God given bent towards exploration, curiosity and innovation. But what if we turned that and instead of creating more things that involve the extraction mining of like rare minerals and creating metals and concrete? What if we figured out ways to innovate that are a blessing to the planet rather than a burden? What if we mimic the design principles of nature in biomimicry?

And when I'm hanging out with my permaculture friends, my eco village friends, I'm seeing them learn to live in a whole new way that is entirely doable. Like we could actually do this. It's not for want of a policy shift or a blueprint for change that we're experiencing the difficulties that we have, I think it's a want for a heart level connection, which is why I consider myself a kind of contemplative activist who wishes to help people reconnect to spirit, self, other and world because when we do that, then we're naturally going to find the policies and the community forms that will enable us to to live more gently with this planet; to take our seat at the creaturely table, rather than continuing on with this delusion that we are somehow entitled to dominate.

Seth Price 43:36

Well we're not…for those listening if you haven't listened to I did an interview with Elizabeth Johnson, it was about this time last year but I think it released in February of 2018, and we talked about interdependency and ecology and Darwin and evolution and our responsibility and how we are all interdependent, like who's subservient to who? The plants and the trees or us, because if we destroy them all then guess who loses. But that doesn't mean that I'm subservient to treat. But it mirrors a lot of what you're saying and something I should revisit. And I didn't realize that I should until I'm hearing you talk and I'm sitting here nodding my head, and I'm sure you're watching me lean over not pay attention while I take notes. (Mike laughs)

But I'm getting to, to mysticism a bit. And so the way that I would define mysticism is take whatever your salvation experiences your your come to Jesus moment is, and anything like that I would qualify as mysticism. Something that I struggle to give words to, because it's beyond what I can describe, which oddly enough is the way that I think the Bible was written. That it is people's best attempt to talk about something that they have no ability or vocabulary to comprehend, or document. But I do know, from what I've read, the way the brain works is every time I revisit that mystical experience or connection with the divine, I'm going to alter it and I'm going to change it slightly. And so how do I talk about mysticism or mystical events related to God In a way that will preserve what actually happens and remains genuine?

Mike 45:07

Hmmm…wow, yeah, that's such a good question actually happens like my internal postmodernist wants to deconstruct the idea of anything actually happening. But then on the other hand, I feel like well, that's happening in our political life right now and we have Trump so maybe I should…

Seth Price 45:24

Trump is actually happening….

Mike 45:27

Trump is actually happening, but they would talk about what was what's Kellyanne Conway’s early term about the how they were alternative facts. It's like, oh, my goodness, the fundamentalists are becoming the worst caricature of post modernity that they always warned us emergers about, alternative facts and fake news.

But, I'm going to use that as the launching point to say a few things that came to mind and you can rein it back in if I didn't answer your question about that.

Okay, so when I think of what you're describing these like, really powerful, transcendent experiences. I definitely would include those within mystical experiences. But not all mystical experiences are that kind of like how all poodles are dogs but not all dogs are poodles.

I think you're describing a poodle of an experience really…describing a poodle of an experience that sort of translates to transcendent, powerful experience that I would probably label more as a you know, drawing from my Pentecostal background as more of like an ecstatic experience. This sort of, “Oh man, this is like really different than my ordinary”. Whereas I think mysticism offers us the opportunity to begin experiencing a more sublime or subtle divinity within the ordinary everyday moments.

So the art of union with reality is this gradual letting go and easement into what “is” out of which can definitely prepare us to have more of those kinds of transcendent experiences in the present tense these sort of ecstatic experiences. But it's interesting because unlike my Pentecostal background, most contemplatives warn against having too much emphasis on seeking these unusual experiences. And frankly, we're a bit tame even these days compared to experiences that saints have reported in centuries past. You know people will talk about levitation and manifesting the stigmata, the wounds of Christ have their hands and all kinds of weird stuff, which again, is as a maybe overly credulous Pentecostal I cannot entirely dismiss as possible.

But at the same time, all these you know, contemplatives are like that's cool, return to your practice. And returning to the practice in the healthiest of the mystics was, again, not about attaining a union that they that their soul somehow was missing was about recognizing what is and when I begin to recognize what it is and recognize that I'm gonna have all the God I could ever have, even in this moment, even sitting here talking to you. My time sitting on a bench in meditation or contemplative prayer, centering prayer, is simply re-tuning my heart to be more receptive to what is it's not provoking God to create this extraordinary reality that was not otherwise there. And so it made me circle back around to what I think is part of what you're asking, which is, you know, just like when you make a copy of a copy of the copy, eventually the copy loses its integrity; if I'm going to continue talking about this amazing mystical experience I had when I was 12 years old it might eventually lose its potency. My I guess my best response to that would be to continue living in the open hearted manner that had you receive that initial experience to begin with the living more off of fresh manna than only recounting the past.

Seth Price 48:54

Yeah, yeah. No, I like that. But yeah, and I might have missed that. So I don't mean that that's the only way to get a mystical experience I don't mean that. But that's often what I equate a mystical experience. And I often find that they come when I'm not actually looking for them. Usually they come in an inconvenient time when I'm actually not in the mood for them. If that makes sense, like at a time that I don't need to deal with this right now, I don't want to deal with this right now. And I know for me, oftentimes, it's during contemplative prayer, or for the one thing that I've been leaning into a lot this year is the Examen and I can only do so many things at one time. Then I talked a little bit about conspiring prayer with Mark Karris and I haven't gotten to that yet. I'm going to try that a little bit more as I pray, but when we're talking about contemplative practices and contemplative spirituality, I find that there's a huge correspondence between trauma both collectively and internally. And so how do I while I'm trying to quiet my mind into whatever the contemplative practices, how do I deal with and filter trauma either collect or personal?

Mike 50:02

Yeah, I'm so glad you named that because you know, again, part of this paradigm that I'm exploring where I'm putting anthropology in dialogue with Scripture in dialogue with contemplative practices, is that the shift to, again to agriculture and writing and some of these abrupt technological shifts that happened, seem to have the effect of trauma in our species. That we began to have this experience where we lost inches off of our stature years off of our lifespan, men and women turned against each other in ways that were unprecedented. And it's really hard to overemphasize the roots of sort of species wide trauma that begins to open in that time period.

And I think it echoes through today in all the different ways that each of us have experienced these various traumatic breaks in our lives. And, you know, I think that Thomas Keating who recently passed away one of the pioneers of centering prayer. He sometimes referred to centering prayer as, as the divine therapy. And rather than trying to, you know, stop these thoughts from occurring, stopping these sort of weird, unprecedented emotions and images were arising; it's actually built into the unique genius of centering prayer itself, that you don't actually try to stop thoughts you don't actually try to quiet the mind.

There are meditation(al) forms that do that various, you know, transcendental meditation, etc, where they're more concentrated practices. But as one of my favorite teachers, Cynthia Bourgeault says, Centering Prayer has more of a kenosis underlying it, this more melodic sense like the early Christian hymn and Philippians that, that Christ, being equal with God but not seeing equality is something to be grasped and instead took the form of a servant, you know surrendering this. And that as a surrender practice, we can continue to let whatever arise, arise, and then let it go in the moment, trusting that God is present with us.

And, you know, that can be a nice thing to say. I think the other thing with that is whenever we begin to do any kind of deep work, and I would definitely include a consistent practice of centering prayer as being a part of really deep personal work, it's important to have community around you. And this is again, where I think the Trinitarian spirituality really comes home. Like, do you have a circle of folks who can be unconditionally present with you that you can process with? Barring that do you have a spiritual director? Do you have you know, are you especially awesome faith community?

You know, I found part of my community not within Christianity, but within a men’s circle with an organization called The Mankind Project, about about seven years ago I did a men's initiation right, a rite of passage with this amazing organization that helps men move beyond the stereotypes of masculinity and discover what masculinity, authentically and lovingly and powerfully, means for us. And part of the enduring gift of that was being able to sit for many years in a circle of men, where we had absolute confidentiality. And we have certain agreed upon processes from which to express our true selves and all of our love and our anger and everything and know that that can be okay.

And you know, frankly, even I greatly respect therapists and therapy. But there are ways that we can, like peer led, teach each other and hold space for each other, to deal with the traumas that come up when we're doing important work like contemplative prayer.

Seth Price 53:50

Besides centering prayer, what has been the most impactful contemplative practice that you do on a continuing basis that is really changed the way that you do things?

Mike 54:02

Yes. I'm glad you asked because I feel like I have a response to this that might be different than what other wonderful responses you get from other contemplative folks because of this sort of Trinitarian emphasis. You know, Father Richard was very generous in our collaborating on the book, in that he allowed me to include some practices in the back of the book that drew from my experience facilitating these relational skills exercises.

About a decade ago, in addition to finding men's work and finding that to be so amazingly transformative and wishing that Christianity had something comparable, at least in our contemporary experience of the candor and the skill that this movement had of this men's work. I also discovered this stream of development work known variously as authentic relating practices or relational skills practices. And they involve various face to face exercises, where we're invited to become more vulnerable, let our guard down truly see another person or persons sitting across from us. It can be as simple as an eye gazing exercise, which is one of the things that we include in the book, and just really softening our gaze, allowing ourselves to be seen, as well as to see the other that's in front of us.

And I've got to tell you, when facilitated well, these practices can be just as contemplative as when I'm sitting, you know, by myself in a solo practice of really opening up to the marvel of the mystery and the story of this other human being who is right in front of me. And so I've been privileged to help facilitate this for churches and groups for the last several years. In fact, if you go to relationalskills.com you could see a good friend of mine, David and I, where we've been able to do this at the Wild Goose Festival, and several congregations from various denominations in various parts of the country.

And I really want to bring these practices more together, because I think a lot of even advanced Christian contemplatives, frankly, don't know how to fully be with another person at a really intimate level. And, or, have no way to have boundaries and when to say, hey, actually, this doesn't feel good. And I'm going to hold a boundary here but to have awareness of when I'm holding a boundary and when I'm letting you in, and you know, similarly in a lot of these personal development worlds, where these practices are the whole of what they do, I find that they're really hungry for and curious about an established spiritual religious tradition, like Christianity. I've had some of the best conversations with some of my friends in these these particular realms. But I think even my Southern Baptist, evangelism explosion, mentors would be proud of me for.

Seth Price 56:58

so I can't picture what that would look like. Like even like I know if even staring at my family, like my kids, my wife for too long with intention, which is what I'm hearing you say like I'm looking to see as opposed to looking “at” is wholly uncomfortable for me like it makes my skin crawl. And so what is the feedback or how many people are doing this when you're facilitating this, like, Is everybody looking at everyone or I'm assigned? Like I'm assigned to Mike and Jenny's assigned to Thomas or what does it look like?

Mike 57:32

Yeah, so even even your use of the term staring tells me a lot about how you've experienced this in the past. You know, some some species really locked eyes as a form of aggression and intimidation. And it definitely it does have this force staring kind of thing. I'm sure that you know, since you and I are our perfect fathers, we've never, you know, stared at our children in that kind of way to hurt some time.

Seth Price 57:56

(laughter) Sometimes that how I talk to them. Just a stare. (laughter)

Mike 58:01

But the gaze is something something altogether different, the loving glance, what Father Richard likes to call the very etymology of the term respect means to look again and to look again in a deeper sort of way. And so this is being facilitated, one is you know a pair of people could do it you know, you could whip out the as part of the divide dance, read it and do it with your your wife tonight if you want it after dinner. But when we facilitate it in a group, this particular exercise, eye gazing, we’ll typically do it will have the room break up into pairs. And we'll give folks a certain amount of time. usually start off with one minute and then we might increase it as people switch partners.

So we have them connect with a person silently and we give them certain prompts. So it's less awkward. It's not complete silence, various visualizations or exercises they can do while they're holding this other person's gaze, and a lot of people are uncomfortable with eye contact. They either see it as threatening, or see it as inherently romantic. You know, and when we have people switch partners, we'll often explore, we'll take shares in between people, we'll explore things with gender dynamics, you know, if they're heterosexual, they might be like, “Oh, it's easier to connect with some of the same sex than the opposite sex”, or vice versa, if they're a bit homophobic, you might be really hard for them to do this with someone of the same sex.

So all kinds of interesting stuff comes up that I feel like we really need to have conversations about as the human species, and you know, I'm sure it can be facilitated in less skilled ways where it might seem more volatile than it needs to be. But that's one example. We can also introduce sentence stems into those exercises. So after some moments of silence, connection, we might have people say, what I'm noticing when I'm with you is…and then they share something. And then the other person, you know, receives that takes that in. And then they might say, “hearing that I notice ____”. And what they notice may or may not be directly related to what the other person initially named noticing. It's your own experience in that next moment, it's not exactly like a linear conversation.

So these kinds of experiences can be deeply transformative. And you know, if you don't even want to plunk down the cash for a copy of the Divine Dance, I give away a bonus chapter on my blog. It has several of the exercises in it and also several exercises unique to the bonus chapter. So if your listeners want to, you can go to Mikemorrel.org/bonuschapter. And you can see some of these exercises and try them out for yourself.

Seth Price 1:00:54

Yeah, I have not downloaded that because I assumed it was the same as the last chapter of the book it's over there. I'll do that today. I'm all about that. I found personally that when I do anything like that, and I've never done, I'll try to use the right verbiage eye gazing. Emotionally, it changes me in a way that I can't put that toothpaste back into the tube like it. Yeah, be it. I don't know, like, over the last four to five years, every little thing of my religion or my faith that has changed has changed in a way that they're all very small.

I wrote a blog post about this not too long ago, the very small tiny things that shift the entire mountain individually, they look like just one night of practice of this intention to look at Mike's face and talk to him about what I see in him. What I find true in him What I find holy in him and etc. But that changes the way that every interaction from there on, yeah.

So I guess the caveat is make sure you're ready for that when you get in it. So if what is what is your hope for the church, I hate to think 50 years from now because I'll be dead. So what is what is the hope for the church even five years from now? So we live in an age of horrible trauma, a lot of yelling, I don't want to be political. But there's all of that. People are dying by the millions in Yemen, like what do you hope for our church to either mobilize change and or do or none of that in the next three to four years that you feel like would be a good thing for people to invest energy into?

Mike 1:02:34

Yeah, such a great question, you know, growing up and being this really arduous spiritual seeker, exploring the house church movement and the emerging church conversation, you know, there probably would have been a time where I would have had highly ambitious answer to that question. You know, especially before having children, I had very specific ideas of how to rethink both theology and practice in really detailed ways. And having kids changed that for me a bit not in the sense of like settling, but realizing that there were these sort of torchbearers who had been pioneering this for decades within a certain mainline Protestant denominations. And they were also open to rethinking who they were and how they were.

So to be more concrete, like since moving to Asheville, North Carolina, where my family and I've lived for about a year and a half now, I would say that there are half a dozen churches that we could be fully a part of, without crossing our fingers-without feeling like we were missing out on something. And the traits that I'm appreciating about these groups are that they really do honor the priesthood of all participants, the sort of holiness and generativity of all of us that there isn't this sort of expertise cast that separates the ministers from everyone else; even though these ministers do indeed have a lot of expertise and skill in being who they are.

They encourage a greater level of congregational participation, perhaps not as much as in my house church days, but nonetheless, like you could attend our particular faith community Circle of Mercy for a couple of months and not have a clear idea of who paid ministers are versus who active congregants are just different people, you know, sharing messages with the children, working with communion, facilitating the prayers of the people, etc. And, you know, robust engagement with with Scripture with the lectionary as a launching point kind of keeping grounded in the narratives of our tradition. But then, you know, what's been most touching for me in this time of post election craziness is the way in which these faith communities but the ones that I'm directly a part of and the ones that I'm aware of are such a witness in our community. That we are standing with folks who are on the verge of being deported. We're writing letters we're visiting, we're being visible with them we're engaging with ICE. We're engaging, you know, folks who don't have homes in our area.

People who are experiencing various addictions and cycles of poverty, like both individual congregants and as a church are involved in the frontlines of so many important initiatives with the most vulnerable of our culture. And, you know, Christianity gets a bad rap nowadays, and in many ways, rightfully so. But I actually don't see the local yoga studio or meditation groups out there in the community as much as I see Progressive Christian communities really practicing what they preach and really embodying that Jesus they seek to live as. And I would basically say I want to see that tribe increase. I want to see folks who are living these whole harvest It open handed lives of service to the world; and also paying attention to the interior life paying attention to self observation and awareness and looking at what fellowship with God looks like in these various contexts.

But honestly, it could take a lot of different ecclesial logical forms. But as long as we're being mindful of the inward journey and the outward journey, and the journey together, I actually feel hopeful. An part of that hope is also rooted in the the sobering sociological reality that as our our empire begins to contract, which I think that you know, personally not to get doom and gloom, but I do think that the age of American hegemony in the world is already fading.

Seth Price 1:06:48

I agree.

Mike 1:06:50

And then, you know, more globally looking at catastrophic climate change, ocean acidification, desertification, deforestation, massive species extinction, we're in the midst of the sixth great species extinction of our planet. We're losing so much biodiversity it's heartbreaking. Because of all of that, I actually think we are going to become as a culture, more religious and not less as we're seeking to like find, and ground, in the meaning of our own contraction. And so if I was, you know, talking to ministers today, and I probably am, you're probably listening, I would say be less concerned with the sort of preoccupied questions that folks have been asking for the last few decades of how do we keep church relevant? How do we keep people in the seats, these sorts of really technical questions, and ask questions of how do you or people in your congregation practice hospice care? How do you be with someone who is dying?

Because while I'm not going to speculate as to how many literal deaths are going to occur in the coming decades. I do think a certain element of our culture is dying. I do think a certain self perception of Americans as being this “exceptional people” is going to die. And when that happens, if you are a loving, pastoral, place you are going to attract people to your community. And so it's a question of how can we be agents of compost, agents of yeast, agents of transformation when it looks like decay is all around us? I do think that is what we are being called into.

Seth Price 1:08:29

I agree with that. And it reminds me of one of the first interviews I did was with a gentleman from Houston, Sean Palmer, and I asked him a similar question in a different way. And he said, if we would, just to paraphrase it down, just draw a circle around the five mile radius of your church and “we own these people, whatever they need, that's what we do”. If they need help, they do it at whatever they need, whether or not they come in whether or not they tithe. We love these people.

And if every church would do that, there's the entire population basically taking care of. But no, I agree with you. I full heartedly think that the age of America being whatever America wants to be, and whatever America thinks that it is, is, is already passed and just not realized, and it will be traumatic when it is realized. But that is an entirely hour long podcast episode.

Mike 1:09:24

Part 2!

Seth Price 1:09:26

Where would you direct people to engage with your content Mike. So you've got your website, Mikemorell.org, but where else would you have people engage and kind of dig into contemplative practice, dig into a little bit of what you do because you do, like 27 different things between the Wild Goose gestival and Speakeasy and everything else…so where would you send people?

Mike 1:09:45

Yeah, I would send people to MikeMorrell.org. It is my hub on the web. And specifically, if you sign up for my email newsletter, which happens automatically if you're getting the bonus chapter, you'll be able to stay in touch with all the things that that I'm working on. We've got some things coming up this year with Wisdom Camp at The Wild Goose festival in summer of 2019. With the launch of ReWilder, which I don't have the URL to give you yet, because we're still building that site as of this interview, maybe once it airs, there'll be a website to give you for the show notes.

But yeah MikeMorrell.org is the hub. And then you know, if you're interested in the relational exercises, we were talking about these sort of, you know, group contemplative practices, I would recommend going to relationalskills.com. And actually, you know, one of the 27 things for something completely different. This will be up by the time folks are listening. My friend of mine and I are actually launching an Enneagram jewelry company for folks who are into the enneagram who are struck by the symmetry and the symbolism of the Enneagram. We're creating high quality rings and pendants.

Seth Price 1:10:58

What does that look like for an 8, or actually, I feel like predominantly when I'm not at work, I'm a five. So what does that look like if I was to buy a pendant for five are they all the same?

Mike 1:11:09

They're all the same, right? Right now we simply have a few different designs, but they're all variations of the the nine pointed enneagram symbol or not differentiating based on the number. Which, yeah, I'm a bit of an Enneagram geek and you know, what's interesting about all of that is that the enneagram of personality is but one use of the Enneagram. It's sort of an esoteric handy tool and there are many other uses of the enneagram. And in its origination point, it was actually a symbol that was more to be danced with your body than to be analyzed as to what your type was. But again, that would be a whole other hour long conversation.

Seth Price 1:11:51

I'm willing to have that too.

Mike, thank you so much for for coming onto the show. genuinely enjoy the conversation. I look forward to doing it again. At some point in the future of our busy lives.

Mike 1:12:02

Likewise Seth, let's do it. I’m glad to be here.

Seth Price 1:12:39

If we can't learn to embrace mysticism, our faith is quickly going to become, “the law”, it's just gonna be dogma, it's just gonna be memorization and it's just gonna be penal, like a legal contract. And I don't want that and I don't think you want that and I believe for the future of our faith in our church we will have to learn to embrace aspects of our faith that are emotional and carnal at a level that are hard to talk about.

Thanks so much for listening. Please remember to rate and review the show on iTunes. Talk with you soon. Roll those music credits.

Seth Price 1:13:59

The beats you heard today that you bobbed your head to our from artist Ecclesia they are based out of Florida. I am falling in love with that band. There is not enough music out there from them and there needs to be more and I highly encourage you to click the link on the playlist, follow their stuff, hit that subscribe button. Every time a new jam comes out from them instantly in love, love what they're doing. As always, you will find those beats those tracks that music on Spotify more easily at the podcasts playlist. And Can I Say This At Church and there's two feeds there, one for the show and one for the playlist. It is quickly becoming one of my favorite playlist so hope you listen to it.